Cards Against Humanity sued SpaceX yesterday, alleging that Elon Musk’s firm illegally took over a plot of land on the US/Mexico border that the party-game company bought in 2017 in an attempt to stymie then-President Trump’s attempt to build a wall.

“As part of CAH’s 2017 holiday campaign, while Donald Trump was President, CAH created a supporter-funded campaign to take a stand against the building of a Border Wall,” said the lawsuit filed in Cameron County District Court in Texas. Cards Against Humanity says it received $15 donations from 150,000 people and used part of that money to buy “a plot of vacant land in Cameron County based upon CAH’s promise to ‘make it as time-consuming and expensive as possible for Trump to build his wall.’”

Cards Against Humanity says it mowed the land “and maintained it in its natural state, marking the edge of the lot with a fence and a ‘No Trespassing’ sign.” But instead of Trump taking over the land, Cards Against Humanity says the parcel was “interfered with and invaded” by Musk’s space company. The lawsuit includes pictures that, according to Cards Against Humanity, show the land when it was first purchased and after SpaceX construction equipment and materials were placed on the land.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I know you’re joking, but people really underestimate just how rich Elon Musk and other billionaires are. Say you went back to the time of Christ, 0 AD, and got a really good job. Say you were making $10,000 a day, in today’s dollars. $10,000 a day, every day, no days off. What’s even more amazing, say you were super good at saving. So good that you squirreled that $10,000 away every day without spending a penny. And you did that every day, for the last 2,000 some years (good for you for being immortal as well).

        If you did all that, and then did it another 34 times, you would almost have as much money as Elon Musk.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Man… That land was pristine too… Wild horses used to roam free there in the Texas moonlight. I remember how strongly it reinforced my consumer opinion of cards against humanity - I knew that as long as they kept maintaining that parcel, I could freely buy their products. If spacex is allowed to just invade that land unchecked though, and justice isn’t restored to CAH, I imagine that would impact my potential future purchasing potential by at least $1,000,000… And that’s only speaking for me. I imagine at least 100,000 of you feel the same as I do, I think damages should asking for that amount and make CAH whole again considering their lost earning potential. Those unrealized profits were callously stolen by musk.

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    So all I take from this is they took your money and did absolutely nothing with it to do anything to protect the land beyond marking it?

    Edit

    Our longstanding reputation as a company that makes outrageous promises and actually keeps them is on the line! We promised we’d use every legal tool at our disposal to protect this land from bullies like Trump and Musk (who’s spending millions to get Trump electedand also wants to build the stupid wall). If we don’t take action now, why would anyone ever trust us again?

    Maybe because you didn’t do anything to actually do what you said…?

    • silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      One might argue that ‘doing nothing’ with land was an extremely good way of protecting it, but one would have to be talking to someone who was operating in good faith if they were to bother to do so…

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Just buying land does what? Show a presence, if they mowed it how often like they claimed it wouldn’t have gotten that bad before noticing. Put an actual fence on it, what they use? Some stakes a twine? I’m having a discussion so we can figure these details out, what are you doing than insulting someone for trying to talk?

        This also is t he first time they failed in their expectations, the hole they dug was a failure, they had to constantly modify their claim because they didn’t realize they rules and regulations regarding making. A safe deep excavation.

        I’m trying to discuss in good faith, the fuck is this? I provided a quote to show my particular issue and described it, what part of my comment is not trying to discuss in good faith? If anything you going straight to insulting someone is the one lacking any sort of civility here.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Buying land gives them the legal ownership of it, allowing them to stop others using it.

          Why do you assume they need to build something on the land?

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            That did a good job didn’t it? Plenty of ample evidence that worked eh?

            Did I say they need to build anything on it? How did you get that from my comment?

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              Why are you complaining about what they did when it’s someone else that illegally used land that they didn’t own?

              If you own a plot of land you’re free to use it by doing fuck all with it, it doesn’t give anyone the right to use it and it doesn’t mean you’re being irresponsible by not doing anything including not putting up a fence, it’s other people’s responsibility to make sure they respect the limit of the property they own.