• TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    26 minutes ago

    Is it just me that doesn’t believe the McDonald’s employee thing? I think they used Pegasus or Stingray type privacy violating device/exploit and just said it was a restaurant employee.

  • Ithorian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I hope someone put the dude face on the internet so everyone knows where to spit when they pass by him

  • boomzilla@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The sad thing is the rat will get their money if Mangione is convicted (and he most probably will even if he’s just a scapegoat). Even if the responsible office will block the reward, some CEO will jump in and hand him way more than the 60k. Maybe they’ll fabricate it into a heatwarming christmas story with some sad background stories of the rat and how they’re now able to pay off the mortgage of their parents home or something.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Wait for the next step: the franchise fires the employee because of several 1 star reviews and death threats

    • Buglefingers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure it’s already corporate policy to not question people abour fake bills or do anything to stop shoplifters (because insured and liability). Wouldn’t be surprised if a new corporate policy crops up if something like that does happen

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        56 minutes ago

        Can confirm… store manager.

        I joke that our policy for shoplifters is to offer them a bag.

        In reality it’s to offer them a cart as a non accusatory way of saying “I see you”

        As for bills I had my boss suggest I take them to the bank. I had to clarify “and I tell them I believe there is a counterfeit in there… Right … Otherwise it’s dangerously close to trying to pass a counterfeit myself… A felony…”

        He paused and answered “sure if that makes you more comfortable”

        To be clear I understand and agree with a lot of it. Why should I ask my workers to risk their life over some toothpaste? Why should I ask them to risk their life confronting a counterfeiter who is already done commiting felonies.

        I also understand it doesn’t help the company. One dead worker will cost the company more than all the product a person could steal. Even with insurance the cost of training even a cashier is nearly $1000. It goes up from there.

        It is still frustrating and my employees often take a lot of training to convince them not to care if someone is stealing.

        And customers also get frustrated when they tell me someone is stealing and I give them an answer like "that’s unfortunate " and go back to work.

  • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Anyone have a citation about the rat not getting the money? People keep saying that, but I haven’t seen a single article posted about it.

      • MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        10 hours ago

        this doesn’t really add to the discussion, but i just wanted to say thanks for sharing a source. I feel like i don’t see it enough, so i appreciate you taking the time to share it

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I don’t feel like you need to apologize for excuse saying a heartfelt thank you with a text comment, just because it doesn’t add to the discussion. We need more of this kindness in the world. ❤️

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        both the arrest and conviction of the suspect

        Makes perfect sense, but that’s just a matter of time.

        might not be eligible for [the NYPD] part of the reward.

        OK, so maybe they won’t be getting 10k of the 60k. They would still get 50k if he’s convicted. So many people are definitively saying that they’re getting none of the money, and that makes no sense.

        • chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The tip didn’t contribute to conviction, only the arrest. The words “both” and “and” rather than “consequent” are explicit.

          The rat won’t be paid.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I don’t have a citation. But I do believe that you’d normally have to wait for a conviction before getting the reward. Otherwise it could be the wrong guy.

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I was thinking the same thing. So why is everyone on Lemmy saying “The snitch didn’t even get the money, so they did it for nothing!”

        • Manalith@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Because they didn’t read any of the sources and just heard about the NYPD requirement that they call the tip line, which they didn’t do, so unless there’s some major backlash, they definitely won’t be getting $10,000 of the reward.

          The other $50,000 from the FBI we’re all kinda assuming will have some other reason to not be paid out, but if we’re being honest, if the 1% want us to continue turning on each other in the future, they’re gonna have to let these high profile snitching cases go through.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    There are actually more details involving where the rewards come from and the existence of an evaluation process, i.e. you don’t just make a phone call and somebody hands you a pile of cash. That’s how rewards have always worked. But anything beyond a meme-level thought process is super boring, right? Gotta make an instant value judgement, congratulate yourself for uncovering injustice, and scroll on to the next item in the feed.

    And somehow we still expect elections to produce meaningful results.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    This thing about them not getting the promised reward needs to go viral so in the future whenever someone’s thinking of turning someone in to get the reward money, they’ll know they’re highly unlikely to get a damn thing.

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        https://kpel965.com/mcdonalds-employee-may-not-get-60000-reward-for-tipping-off-police-about-luigi-mangione/

        This one was posted further up. The tl;dr is that because they didn’t call the NYPD tip line, they definitely* won’t get the $10,000 from them, barring major backlash that may make them walk that back.

        The $50,000 from the FBI is up in the air, but is dependent on him getting convicted. There’s some wording that someone else pointed to about the tip needing to lead to an arrest AND conviction, saying that because the tip itself only lead to the arrest, they won’t be paid, but I’m uncertain about that.

        I mentioned in another comment that if the 1% want us to keep snitching, these high profile situations kinda need to pay out.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s why everyone who cares needs to spread the word.

        People don’t need to care. They might share it as a fun factoid, they might just say that’s crazy and never think about it again

        Until they’re in a position to get a reward… They’ll care then. That little idea they heard in passing will pop up… Maybe it gives them pause.

        $10k is pretty tempting for a lot of people…a chance at a $10k reward they’ve heard rarely is paid out is a lot less tempting

        Maybe they Google it first, maybe they think twice about if the crime is worth reporting. Maybe they see the world in black and white and believe it to be their duty

        It’s worth spreading some information, even to people that don’t care

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Police: Here’s 10, thousand dollars! Thanks for the tip!

    The fed: oh I see you made some extra money, Here’s your entire one thousand dollars after tax!

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    225
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is why you don’t snitch. The powers that be don’t care about you, have no intention to do right by you, and will actively look for ways to avoid you after they are done with you.

  • qx128@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Did they seriously not give the snitch the bounty? Can anyone provide official news story on this?

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Conviction is required, and the informant needs formal recognition by the FBI as a recognized informant first. Karen just called 911, forfeiting the reward.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Lol of course there’s stupid hoops like that.

        So anybody who is out and about and sees a fugitive with a publicized reward should know…don’t call 911. Call John Walsh, or pound sand.

        Probably gotta call a specific extension that’s only staffed from 10am to 2:30pm with a 2 hour lunch from 11:15 to 1:15 on the first and third weeks of the month and 12:15 to 2:15 on the other weeks.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s hillarious. If this were a movie I’d call it bad writing. Heck almost any editor in the world would have it changed to a scene where the snitch is suddenly blinged the fuck out.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    401
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Columbine kicked off an epidemic of school shootings because of the attention it got. Some people need a focus for their misery and I am not ashamed to say that I would rather see heartless corporate executives fear for their safety instead of school children gunned down as they hide in a closet. Just putting that out there.

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It really would be a strange kind of uniquely American poetry if our school shooting problem inverted itself into a megacorp CEO shooting solution.

      • CaptSneeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        17 hours ago

        If a few more CEOs gets off’d, they’ll ram gun control legislation through congress faster than Trump can wolf down a Big Mac.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          A papercut that draws blue blood is a bigger issue to these freaks than a river of poor corpses.

        • Benjaben@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Historically it’s been threats to the owner / controller class that have produced serious gun control legislation in the US, so you are probably right! But if you mean actual confiscation a la Australia, pretty sure that’s off the table here. Sincerely think it’d spark a war no matter who sincerely attempts it or why.

        • ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The cat is out of the bag, no? 3d printing guns is a bit of a Pandoras box in regards to gun control. Especially in America where it has been legal for so long

          • unphazed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Federally legal. I didn’t realize it but like 14 states outlaw them and others have prohibitions on parts of them. Honestly, I’m impressed it didn’t break. The idea of making one makes me nervous over safety. I haven’t even been brave enough to print a stock or foreguard simply out of concern. I also don’t trust aluminum casings (if a shell splits it’s likely damaging the barrel or receiver).

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Hello lonely young men with something to prove, have you seen how much positive attention Luigi got

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      In this regard, all the media attention might be a good thing. I haven’t seen this much coverage since that runaway bride horse shit 15 years ago.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        14 hours ago

        whoo, downvotes and no replies

        Yeah, posting bullshit gets that. Get your facts straight before you start shitting on other people for being like Reddit.

        You’re peak fucking redditor here bud.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        First of all Reddit is responsible because they created and actively allow moderators to act the way they do. They perpetuate the fantasy that mods are all powerful and Reddit admins hands are tied when a person is targeted by a mod.

        Second the person worked there so it’s extremely ironic a slave wagee ratted on a person that was targeting corporate inequality and they denied her the payout.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Then what criteria do you judge a platform based off of? A large part of why I left Reddit was because of the mods…? And the company can certainly do stuff to fix that, but refuse to because money. So if that’s not the case, then I assume you mean the actual structure and layout of Reddit.

        And parent comment is saying the employee is a class traitor. Not the, physical structure and layout of the building? The physical building itself didn’t rat, because physical buildings aren’t sentient.

        Your analogy is absolute dog shit.

      • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        When you think everyone else is an asshole you might double check

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        It wasn’t someone who was eating there bro, it was the Lumpenproletariat in the drive-through window.