You want hypocrisy? Wait until you see the 180° flip on mail-in voting after this election. They’ve been telling us for five years that mail-in ballots are all fraudulent. Now that Democrats are telling women they can use in-person voting to undermine their husbands, I guarantee they will push to make mail-in voting far easier and shut down more polling places.
3D chess my ass.
Jeez, Men getting upset at their wife being allowed to vote anonymously… What wimps.
Lol. In my very conservative state (UT), it’s incredibly easy to do mail voting, and I would be surprised if it doesn’t count for the majority of votes this election.
Some details about this election and 2020 election (updated as of this morning):
Elections staff across Utah have processed nearly 829,000 ballots as of Monday morning, according to Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson.
That’s 46.2% of the ballots mailed to Utah’s 1.8 million registered voters, she said in a post on X.
Early voter turnout was higher in 2020, Henderson added — about 54.1% of voters had returned ballots the Friday before that election.
And from 2020 election:
- Trump - 865,140
- Biden - 560,282
So almost as many people have voted early this election as voted for the winner in 2020. So there’s a good chance we’ll cross the 50% threshold again this election if we get another 4%-ish to drop off their ballots today. I imagine a number will drop them off at polling places tomorrow as well instead of actually going into the booth to vote, but I don’t think those count for the statistics here.
So at least in my very red state, mail voting is super popular. I have actually never voted in person, every vote has been by mail or early voting. It’s super nice.
I always appreciate stats, so point taken. That said, Utah isn’t a major swing state where we expect these efforts to take place.
Republicans have been trying to minimize the blue shift in swing states by rejecting as many mail-in ballots as possible for a variety of reasons.
In the 2020 presidential contest, Pennsylvania election officials rejected more than 34,000 mail ballots. In a tight 2024 election in the most coveted swing state, even a fraction of that many rejections could spell the difference between victory and defeat — not just in the presidential race, but also in any number of others.
What’s true in Pennsylvania is true, to varying degrees, in other battleground states. Michigan rejected more than 20,000 mail ballots in 2020 and even more in 2022; Arizona turned down 7,700; Nevada 5,600; and Wisconsin about 3,000.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/08/us/election-mail-in-ballot-rejection.html
And they want to reject provisional ballots…
And military ballots …
If the advantage shifts because of women voting in private, I believe we will see Republicans take effort to make in-person voting more difficult.
Utah isn’t a major swing state
Agreed. My point is that this isn’t really a conservative/Republican thing, at least not broadly across the US. It’s simply a strategy to win close states.
No no no, it only counts when “Others” do it, our own sins are “forgivable” for we are special, if we weren’t we wouldn’t be us.
If Epstein died during the Biden administration, Biden would have been blamed, and if there were pictures of them together, and creepy video of Biden talking about Epstein’s preference for young girls, it would have been the only thing Republicans would discuss for years. But when it’s Trump - they are silent.
They have always been hypocrites, assholes and cheaters.
Imagine if 9/11 happened during Obama’s term and he just sat there with a stupid look on his face reading books to children, the right would have lost its shit.
To play Devil’s Advocate, Dubya is an idiot, and he was literally in shock.
“Dick lied to be. He said all I needed to do was read the script, and smile. I didn’t sign up for THIS shit!”
And there is sworn, corroborated testimony of a woman who had to pleasured Biden when she was a teenager while wearing a white glove there probably would have been riots in front of the white house.
They ARE still talking about Biden. The whole hair sniffing thing that went around. One of them brought that up the other day…Dude…you know Biden isn’t in the race anymore right?
I was at a brewery a few months back when Biden was giving an announcement, this was before he dropped out of the race. I was mildly enjoying myself until some guy came in with his wife and just went off on Biden, and specifically orbited around “hunter needs him to stay in office so he can stay out of jail”. Dude was wearing an FOP shirt so he’s obviously an expert on knowing when felons should or shouldn’t be in jail…
It’s more projection. Trump needs to win so he can stay out of jail. Probably the only reason he’s running at all.
I bet another big reason is that he can hold rallies and get his narcissistic high. Has to be awesome for a narcissist to hold events where people are there just to hear him ramble.
Conservatives often want an in-group, that is protected by law, but is not bound by it; and an out-group, not protected by law, but bound by it. Get ready for this to get way worse in case of a Trump victory, alongside with crackpot dictators starting a dick measurement contest of who can ban the most harmless things in the shortest amount of time.
They went almost for like 4 years about that laptop.
Well, the FBI did their best to cover it up, which is very suspicious.
Typical Government of Putin shit. Did anyone listen to recordings provided by Wolfe?
Lol certainly don’t mention that Bill Clinton was on that plane either, or else you’ll see the Lemmy version of the literal same effect, even though neither that man nor his wife are running for office and criticizing them is valid and protected speech. I am currently being told in another thread that Clinton’s abuse of power and thus sexual abuse of Monica Lewinsky is “just as bad” as the consensual cheating relationship Newt engaged in at the time. Even though no, one involved abuse of power and one didn’t.
No one in this country is willing to be honest or have a backbone. It’s pathetic. How about we don’t stump for rapists at all, no matter their political affiliation.
I know that conservatives like to go “if you go after trump for being a pedophile, then what about Clinton?”
And EVERY SINGLE LEFTY goes “okay”.
Like, what a bizarre world where one side of the isle ignores pedophilia if it’s their idol doing it, and the other has a blanket “no pedophile” policy.
Who do you think is leftwing? Democrats? Like status quo Dems? Like the 2016 presidential candidate Hilary Clinton, who is STILL MARRIED to Bill Clinton? The Clinton’s who funded the DNC in 2016 in exchange for explicit support by the party during the primary? This is something ALL lefties are comfortable acknowledging and talking about and we definitely want “girls girl” Hilary Clinton to be in office as a rapist apologist?
Like exactly WHO on the left is bringing up these topics when saying how unacceptable the Clinton’s are in tbe party? What established politician? Or is it journalists and actual leftists and progressives?
That’s like saying establishment Dems care about Citizens United, or stopping officials from holding stocks, or the Panama Papers. It’s the wealthy versus the people and always has been.
If some criminal indictments came out against trump for being a pedophile, the right wing will go NUTS. “It’s a witch hunt!”.
If Clinton gets indicted for his pedophilia, lefties go “yeah good, about time”.
You see the difference right? One’s a cult, the other is normal?
Bill Clinton absolutely should be investigated and by no means should he be president again after that information came out. He also happens to be ineligible for life because of having held two terms, but I and many democratic voters would prefer to hear that he’s being investigated.
The difference between him and trump though, is trump is running for president.
We can call out Trump’s crimes without ignoring everyone else’s. It absolutely disgusts me to read the interference ya’ll are running for literal rapists. And that you think it’s acceptable because “Trump is running for office,” is insane. No.
Trump is running for president, yeah, but Clinton was actually the president when this happened. The court cases are literally ongoing.
I’m saying we, the voters, should be focused on the one who’s running for president when tomorrow is Election Day. We can go after bill on Thursday. On Thursday I won’t mind people screaming about bill’s crimes so long as it’s not calls to prosecute unrelated democrats.
And I should add, both of these people were President.
Cool, but when you dismiss or ignore these very real concerns instead of just using verbiage that acknowledges and accepts it, then you lose voters because they perceive you as a liar.
And I meant that Bill was president while on the plane.
And when you say anything bad about a democrat on the first Monday of November in a leap year when the stakes are this damn high you’re going to be perceived as engaging in whataboutism.
I don’t want to defend bill Clinton. To be honest, I hate the man. He’s a pedo or at least was ok with it. He sexually violated Ms. Lewinsky from a position of power. And he’s been the easy target against the only political party that believes I deserve to be treated decently. Both of those men have engaged in sex crimes. And neither is likely to go to prison for them. This is a hard situation to argue around. So yeah, maybe we both could’ve articulated better from the start.
Ahhh…the “Look…CLINTON” defense…I haven’t heard that one in a couple months. Yes…Bill was a dipshit womanizer, he also hasn’t been relevant in a decade.
Yeah I think Clinton’s current victims actually find these crimes quite relevant today.
Diddy hasn’t really been relevant in a decade, neither was Cosby, should we just ignore them too? Video of Cassie being beaten was forever ago, who cares? Cassie doesn’t need justice, right? The American public don’t deserve to know what’s been going on either, which btw is tbe entire moral basis for journalism and the idea of integrity.
Maybe if you were victim centered with crimes, you could see why it’s concerning there are so many horrible rapists in politics.
And I voted for Kamala. I actually think as a woman and a prosecutor who was exposed to these crimes, she is a great candidate for office with a lot of potential.
They are not relevant to the election…unless we are talking about how Trump is complicit in them.
Objection: Relevance.
Sustained: deat cat.
? You don’t see how it’s relevant to current victims and current politics?
Idk what you’re saying about the “Lemmy version” given that you’re entirely free to do so - in fact, you just did do so
Well, there are things called upvotes and downvotes. So yes I, as an individual, have that opinion. But Greater Lemmy downvoted me and didn’t upvote me, so clearly the sentiment on Lemmy as a group is that Bill Clinton’s Epstein trips and sexual assaults are cool but Trump’s aren’t.
Or maybe you get downvoted for your general “woe is me”, “all of Lemmy is bad” attitude…
I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
That right there, that’s why you get my down-lemm. It’s a negative, sweeping generalization against the very platform you’re on and is sexist. I don’t feel it meaningfully contributes to the discussion.
I have already explicitly told you I believe it because Lemmy is full of men who have no problem with rape, which is pretty fucking common.
Like your position is laughable - I’m unhappy as a woman regarding rape conversations, and I’m only getting downvoted because I’m not “smiling” enough in my comments. I’m sorry I have a bad attitude about rapists. I should really be nicer to them like you.
You’re getting downvoted because of your accusations which are batshit crazy, not because people disagree with you. Liberals don’t give a shit about what happens to Bill Clinton, progressives want him locked up and tankies want to execute him. No one is defending Bill Clinton here.
What people are saying is that there’s an election nearing its end, and the fate of Bill Clinton is right now completely irrelevant to this election, unlike Trump’s fate, because Trump is a man who is one of the two candidates, and Clinton isn’t.
If you then keep pointing out the existence of Bill Clinton multiple times, no one even understands what you’re arguing for. You want to persecute Bill? Okay, sounds good. How is this relevant to this election?
Lol certainly don’t mention that Bill Clinton was on that plane either,
Elsewhere in this same comment section:
Clinton should absolutely be investigated and the book thrown at him if he’s guilty, though. Same as Trump.
That comment got 42 upvotes and 0 downvotes. I assume your downvotes have more to do with:
No one in this country is willing to be honest or have a backbone. It’s pathetic.
Lol quote the rest of that comment or link it because I don’t see it
It’s mind boggling how quickly the GOP became the Fake Party of Fakeness. Almost any claim they make, you can look up and easily find it’s bullshit. It’s like Trump said, “I love the uneducated!” The party thrives on ignorance now. The main force driving them is young men without college who are angry that they don’t have more power. The party’s message is just plant your feet on the ground and insist you’re right until the other side throws up its hands and gives in, like the low self esteem gf who sticks with you no matter what because she’s too dumb to realize she has options. Problem is, Americans know they have options now - and like the saying goes, We Won’t Go Back. I’m really looking forward to this week.
how quickly
Hate to break it to you, but those conservatives spent decades transforming the Republican party into what it is today. It would be unfair to dismiss their years of focus on indoctrinating and cultivating hate and fear.
Barry Goldwater, 1964
"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they’re sure trying to do so, it’s going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can’t and won’t compromise. I know, I’ve tried to deal with them. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are NOT using their religious clout with WISDOM. I’m frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in ‘A,’ ‘B,’ ‘C,’ and ‘D.’ Just who do they think they are?.. I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of “conservatism.”
For future reference if you ever hear that a candidate is going to do what is best for God or God’s will and you take it seriously, you belive in Queens and Kings.
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”
If we’re doing quotes, this Sartre one is good:
Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.
Basically they often know they’re being absurd, but they don’t care. They use language for power and effect, not truth.
The bullshit asymmetry principle aka Brandolini’s Law which states that debunking bad faith claims is an order of magnitude more difficult than creating the bullshit to begin with is a natural consequence of this behavior, and it’s one the conservatives have used forever. The torrent of absolute bat shit crazy nonsense flooding right wing media is extremely difficult to pull someone out of once they’ve been drawn in. We need to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine
That’s more fascism than conservatism. But the two terms are used interchangeably enough these days that your statement holds. Modern day American conservatives don’t wish to conserve anything. They wish to promote fascism.
Eh, that’s more limited to the vocal minority. Unfortunately, that vocal minority is being supported by the quiet majority.
There are some reasonable conservatives in Congress that aren’t big Trumpers, but they don’t get the spotlight.
Fascism is just conservatism with the addition of hyper-nationalism and the blaming of minorities for all of society’s problems.
But the core belief, that some groups are inherently better than others, is exactly the same.
They’d like to conserve the power imbalance currently in favor of white men and wealthy people.
Trump just moved it to another level.
He is the In-group and everyone else is the Out-group all depending on how big of a shit he took in his diaper, how sweet the diet coke in his cup is, who the last he spoke to pointed him towards commenting at, and how many uppers he shoved down his throat with his big Mac.
Obama was a national disgrace after he demeaned the office of the President. He’d put his feet on the Oval Office desk; he’d failed to properly salute his Marine guard; he wore a tan suit.
Trump restored dignity to the office by simulating oral sex at a campaign rally.*
*edit = To those who are sending comments pointing out other transgressions, I know I probably missed the one that offended you the most.
Talking about Trump is like talking about an anime that’s been running for fifty seasons; if yopu talk about the hero fighting a dragon you have to specify which one.
Dude saluted a foreign military officer, to the confusion of all.
And then staged a coup after being responsible for more American deaths than all of our wars combined. I’m starting to think this guy may not be on our side…
And by desecrating a military graveyard.
(On more than one occasion)
Also the parents and families of said interred soldiers, somefuckinghow to the cheers of the crowd. This shit makes me embarrassed to be American sometimes.
Okay hear me out.
He was a White Hat Pedophile. Working the system from the inside.
I don’t want pedophiles working anything from the inside…
If you recognize it for what it is, why are you on that right-wing cesspool of an app?
He’s a pretty popular moderate-left YouTuber/podcaster/talking-head. It’s part of the job.
Gets worse without dissenting voices, that’s why ‘safe space’ is such a double-edged sword.
It’s an entirely captured medium. The best you’ll ever be is the Alan Colmes to CatTurd’s Sean Hannity.
To suggest Republicans only argue in bad faith is to suggest that water is transparent.
Republicans hearing you mention “trans-parents”
Frantic sounds of stirring up as much muck in water as possible
Quick, everyone shit in your water bottle to own the libs!
Flint, Michigan has some questions…
Water isnt transparent if you define transparent as “incapable of transmitting light so that objects or images can be seen as if there were no intervening material”
Water also isn’t a liquid if I randomly change the definition of liquid
and it is if you don’t… this is why you aren’t invited to parties.
