![](/static/e3814064/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/2fd3e262-be28-41a6-9bb5-06c0eb8b3f9d.png)
The thing that rubs me the wrong way is that it’s not that #3 or whatever isn’t recyclable, it’s that it’s not commercially viable to recycle it, as if burying it is somehow of more commercially viable.
It literally comes down to some penny pinching now at the expense of a few generations down the line having to deal with land fills.
It’s only commercially viable to bury most of our waste because we exclude the environmental and intergenerational costs of doing so.
Well. To Java that’s just a string of utf-8 characters, assuming you haven’t bastardised the encoding, and it’s just yanked out of an HTTP entity. So of course they’re different.
If you’re using some json parser and object mapping library (like Jackson) then all bets are off 'cause it could be configured any which way.
On every other language and library it’s whatever the defined behaviour is.
3/10