• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    2 months ago

    Harris’ takeover has been an an absolute success, but anyone claiming they knew it’d work out this way is lying or delusional. Just because we hit the low percentage chance that it all worked out doesn’t mean people were wrong for thinking it was most likely a bad idea because all available history and information basically assured that it was.

    That said, anyone that got vitriolic about it (on either side, tbf) can get bent. This is all uncharted waters right now. Being a dick about it either way isn’t helping anything. Let’s not pretend to know that anything is certain.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah let’s maybe hold off on the victory laps until after the election. This thing is on a knife’s edge still and we got a lot of work to do still to get her over the line.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Still a knife edge, but there’s more space on this knife edge.

        Though that debate performance. …. She was always going to eviscerate him… but she did it with style….

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      I knew that Harris would be a better candidate than Biden.

      You’d have to be proverbially blind to not have seen it.

      Did I know it would be this wildly successful? Not so much. I knew it could be, and I knew Harris would be better than Biden.

      • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m with you and all, but shouldn’t we wait before considering it a victory?

        Plenty of racists and sexists out there who won’t say a word about Harris publicly but will vote for Trump the second they enter the booth no matter what.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m not declaring victory- I’m saying Biden had almost zero chance of beating trump.

          If he had lost like four of any of ten states, he’d have lost I. 2020. He won the EC by a razor’s edge.

          And that was with all the shit of his presidency fresh. He’s had four years to retcon things, to shore up his base. And Biden had 4 years to fuck around on messaging.

          He was and is taking a beating there- and some of it is actually legitimate (Gaza for example.)

          Harris… it’s going to be a tough fight, but it’s her campaign to lose. Which is a night-and-day difference.

      • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No way to know if it “worked out” before all votes are counted (at the end it doesn’t matter how large or small the margin is, just on whose side it is). But yeah, you didn’t need to be a genius to know that she was the objectively better candidate.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          No where in my comment did I say that’s not true.

          But again: if you can’t see the difference- and couldn’t see the difference before Biden dropped out, then I can only assume you weren’t paying attention.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      womp womp i knew it. something about having a cadaver up on stage just spoke to me…

      • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe you’re some kind of genius… Maybe it was that whole polls showing both Biden and Trump being beaten by not just any other Democrat or republican, they were polling under THEORETICAL OPPONENTS. Each of them could have been beaten by the THOUGHT of a different candidate.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I was going to bet a large amount of cash that Biden would lose. We hit rock bottom and all data proved Biden was at best at Jimmy Carter’s level of performance with added baggage like age-related risk. I said then and say now that anyone would be better. Whether that was Harris or whether that was by an open convention – which itself could’ve been exciting and similarly sucked away all attention from Trump – either way.

      At the end of the day all the data convinced not just me but countless Democratic representatives and eventually Biden’s own campaign staff and advisors. Thank fuck he did the obviously right thing.

      What I got wrong: I didn’t believe Harris would work out this well, and in fact I was hoping for Whitmer among others if I’m honest… But I’m happily proven wrong.

      I was also wrong about the VP pick. I wanted Kelly but Walz is the whole package.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is what I don’t get. Everyone here had the sentiment of “we will vote for anyone who is not Donald Trump”. But then they balked at the suggestion that Biden should drop out and insisted that no one could replace him.

        Now that Biden has been replaced… they’re saying Biden being replaced was a low percentage gamble. Something here doesn’t add up.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          No one is gonna admit they were wrong and mean to people when they are obviously the good guy and being good means never making mistakes.

          Over inflated egos that think morality means perfection and leave no room for nuance. Simple. Fucked up American exceptionalism in the Democratic party as much as anywhere else.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      doesn’t mean people were wrong

      This monologue of yours doesn’t mean they weren’t.

      Just say “I am not going to apologize and move on…”

    • Korne127@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      because all available history and information basically assured that it was

      That’s actually just not true. It’s pretty interesting, but the main reason incumbents have such a high chance of re-election is because exactly this happened with most incumbents that had a low chance already: They got cut out by the party. So there has always been natural cherry-picking that only the “good” incumbents went on to actually be the nominee again (and therefore had a disproportionally high rate of winning).

      Although I originally also thought otherwise, when looking at all the data, this was the rational & correct choice.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        While I appreciate data, nothing I see at a glance is very supportive of an incumbent potus dropping out being a good idea. I dont have much time to dig into it right now, but of the two incumbents they highlight in the article, both were VPs that assumed the office after an assassination, and in both elections, the incumbent party lost the white house. Neither are particularly similar to the situation in 2024, nor do they suggest that pulling the incumbent would be a good idea.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Harris’ takeover has been an an absolute success, but anyone claiming they knew it’d work out this way is lying or delusional.

      This is cope. It was obvious.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Cope” lol. Take some time offline. You obviously need it.

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s so fucking gross seeing people act like this over something so serious. The same people would have been unbelievably indignant had they turned out to be wrong, like the absolute children that they are.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      I guess the Russian bots are downvoting you.

      I got so much shit on Lemmy for saying Biden should drop after his debate. Was literally called a Russian bot multiple times.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      my hand fucking shattered against the ceiling after reading this comment

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well Russian bots were spreading the same rhetoric since they were trying to undermine Biden’s campaign in order to get their Russian asset to win.

      Just glad those bots helped the Democrats in the long run even if they didn’t mean it. It has been a lot more quiet from those fronts since the change.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        yeah for sure the russian bots were pushing rhetoric that would replace literally the worst possible candidate to beat trump with someone better. that’s totally real and a strategy that was happening.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right… Because Trump definitely didn’t want to go up against Biden so much that he begs for him back. Still gonna just excuse yourself by imagining it was bots cause it’s easier than questioning your warped view of reality. I get it.

        Not quiet cause the Democrats and left that wanted the change got it and therefore didn’t need to keep raising the point against dismissal and denial… Sure.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s the equivalent of people walking by a bunch of Russians beating a politician in the street and jumping in to help them acting like you were doing it for a better candidate… That nobody know who one was… When nobody even ran against the candidate… The parting yourself on the back when some MUST step in them patting yourself on the back because we lucked the fuck out and Democratic Leadership actually nutted up including having the guy that got his ass beat basically give up because he was battered.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Questioning him in public forums felt like it would’ve helped that very bad man. I’m glad the Joenors applied pressure - that’s very appropriate, e.g. donors calling out that garbage debate behind closed doors.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean we should be questioning Trump’s aptitude every chance we get for the same reasons they were doing it - it makes him look weak, it generates more discussion and therefore more doubt, and it drives down voter enthusiasm.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The reason nobody questions Trump is because there is no question. He is incompetent. Questioning it like questioning if the sky is blue. The only people who don’t know he is incompetent are those who have lost all touch with reality. There is no swaying them because simple things like facts mean nothing to them so what is the point of continuing to shout the same things that every remotionally rational person already knows.

        At least arguing about biden can lead to some actual change as we can see by the fact he isn’t running anymore. We can’t change the republicans but we can make the democrat party better so hopefully they can win.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Russian bot is the new Godwin’s Law. Nazis are common now and easy to spot. But even a leftist argument that’s arguably suboptimal will be interpreted as a Russian bot.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      lol my favorite were those hiding behind Alan Lichtman… The guy who didn’t predict a winner at the time yet and whose pre-prediction endorsement in 2016 was Hillary before later saying she’d lose lol.

      You should see some of my submissions of focus groups post-debate insta-downvoted lol.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve already apologized here, but I’ll do it again. I’m sorry. I was wrong. I didn’t think there was enough time to generate the support needed. I’m really impressed by Kamala’s campaign effectiveness.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, I admit, that was me. I think the rapid political cycle in news made me think the election was closer than it was.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll take the L.

    I legitimately thought there’d be no way for them to be able to campaign enough in just a few months and I’ll gladly admit I was wrong.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      sorry for the L, but i think we’re both glad you’re taking it :)

    • original2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      From an external viewpoint, how the fuck can it cost so much to run one campaign. Even in the uk, we are legally capped at 19 million pounds.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because our country is ran by oligarchs. Money is god here and if you don’t worship the almighty dollar you’re probably gonna have a bad time.

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Take a look at your police force and healthcare and say that again.

            At least your oligarchs have some empathy. Over here they’ll kill you for $5.

            • original2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well they just refuse to invest. Take the examples you gave:

              • We have healthcare, but there is a hospital in which obese patients cannot go on one of the floors because it will collapse.
              • The police are well meaning but we cannot fit criminals in prison and have to release them early.
          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Some of your oligarchs were taught what happens when the serfs revolt, and don’t want beheading to become the national past time again

            • original2@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              true. Doesn’t excuse the fact that some families have estates literally traceable over 900 years back. And any protest we muster wil be stopped by the rain nowdays.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I was definitely in the camp of “Biden shouldn’t drop out” not because I wanted Biden to be President, but mostly because the people who wanted him to drop out just kinda hand waved away what happened after he dropped out.

    They tossed about a few names that they favored and Harris wasn’t really on that list. People gave her a pass or offered some soft criticism, but she wasn’t on people’s short list.

    While I’m very glad that Harris has really shone, I think that surprised a lot of people, there was still the opportunity for the DNC to fuck everything up and put together a ticket that would have been underwhelming. Luckily that didn’t happen.

    I think this is an incredibly lucky “I told ya so”, the gamble worked out, but IMO it could have gone the other way far too easily.

    • CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank you. I was in the same boat. Did I want Biden President again? Not really. But there were no alternatives at the time and I thought that Harris wasn’t exactly getting the recognition when people wanted to just drop Biden.

      I’m glad I’m wrong about staying with Biden. I’m happier that Harris has taken up the mantle. I just hope that it’s enough to drive turnout.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, this is the correct take here. Trying to pretend that this was the plan all along is disingenuous. There was no plan other than ‘Biden bad’.

      The fact that Kamala Harris has clutched momentum and has good odds came out of literally nowhere, as did Harris herself.

      It also can’t be ignored that the ‘Biden bad’ message was being pushed hard artificially by billionaires and Russia, which didn’t exactly fill a lot of Democrats with hope that it was a realistic option.

      We lucked out.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        we did not luck out and the plan was not “biden bad.”

        the plan was “biden is increasingly showing age and is actively losing an election that should be easy to win. polling shows that any other generic nominee does better than joseph robinette biden, so the logical next step is to replace him with his vice president.”

        the trouble is we said that, and you didn’t listen. i was actively scoffed at and called a nazi for saying the above. poll data that showed proof of the above was downvoted and called manipulation. even when the donors started stepping down, it was still called fraudulent and irrelevant. i never hand waved someone asking me who replaces biden, and i always responded harris especially as the time got later. and again i was downvoted and scoffed at for that.

        this was not luck, and you should start actively listening to people you disagree with more because you display some saddening signs of intentional ignorance here.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      wish i got this well thought out and measured of a response 4 months ago. instead it was me getting called. “russian bot” “useful idiot” “MAGA troll” 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️ me being “lucky” or not, did not justify that level of toxicity. thanks for this post tho

    • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nah I’ll admit it, I was entirely wrong in thinking Biden should stay in the race. Though I could say I was worried another person than kamala would take their place I had essentially no faith in her ability at the time either.

      Now look at where we are. Finally, some good fucking hopium. I’m very glad to be wrong

    • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll admit I was wrong. I thought any democratic candidate would be in a weaker spot if Biden withdrew, including Harris.

      Harris did an excellent job of consolidating the party behind her, something I’m extremely grateful for.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Fuck that, I was wrong.

      I believed the DNC would not change candidates, and as such, I firmly believed Biden should get the vote. I believed since Biden had indicated he would run, that he would be the candidate.

      I’m happy Harris is in.

      All that matters is trump doesn’t win. Vote for Harris.

      What I’ve argued a lot about here is third party, or staying home.

      Depending on where you live, doing anything but voting for [democrat] (whoever it is) implicitly helps trump, due to basic game theory in an outcome constrained system.

      In the future I’d love to talk election reform and building more progressive candidates, but that’s not this election.

    • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was wrong. I didn’t think we had the time to find a good alternative, and I definitely didn’t think Harris could be competitive. Happily eating crow! She and her campaign have been amazing!

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Absolutely grossly cruel about their disdain to anyone disagreeing and now just fully onboard without so much as a glance back at the wake of abuse left.

      Honestly the Democrats can be exactly the same kind of bullies for like minded party thinking as the Republicans its just their shit apparently doesn’t stink quite as much to have to take notice of it.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      right like if you weren’t mean about it, no need to apologize. but there was so much shit being thrown around it was quite sad actually

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    I actually had someone go back to one of my comment chains explaining that we needed to push Biden to drop and apologize for their negativity and hostility towards the notion.

    I think that is an absolute rarity of self awareness from anyone and I’ll take the win of knowing there is at least 1 person out there that walked away with a change positive mindset.

    …Wish it was more… But taking the win.

    • sunshine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Kamala Harris hasn’t won, no. But I think she’s already achieved enough momentum that if she loses, it will be safe to say that Joe Biden would have also lost.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was saying that before he dropped, I was wrong, you were right. Brilliant even. This has been not only the right move, but a huge shot in the arm for voter turnout and engagement. We would have lost this if everyone listened to me. I’ll be more open minded going forward. Thank you.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reminder that anything that currently makes you feel happy and content in saving american democracy is likely a conservative psy-op designed to keep you home on voting day.

      Remain scared citizen, remain frantic until after voting day. Feel free to relax afterwards.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You need people engaged and energized to show up to vote. Optimism is unfortunately a huge help in every case.