• skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never thought I would see a flood of Americans refugees coming to Canada to escape a tyrannical government…

    I guess that’s what you get when you elect a criminal with dementia as president.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      Really? People have been talking about it since the Bush administration. Until now things hadn’t gotten bad enough for people to actually do it in large numbers, but people saying that if the Republicans win they’d move to Canada has been repeated so often over the decades that it became a bit of a joke.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 days ago

          Without the crucial steps the W Bush admin took, there would be no Trump. It’s not that Trump isn’t worse but they are part of the same fascist movement, just further developed.

          • Lør@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            We are talking people fleeing the USA for their lives. This is Trump phenomena as he is demonizing and literally going after dissenters.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Bush Jr. started doing that. I recall seeing protestors who opposed the Iraq invasion being arrested for dissent. Remember Dixie Chicks? Yeah, they got cancelled for that. And, lets also not forget about the random violence against anyone remotely kinda like an Arab, to include Punjabis, Liberians, Somalians, Burmese, etc.

              I feel like waaaay too many people forgot about post 9-11 shit.

  • ilost7489@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know this isn’t related to the article but I would love it as a fuck you to Trump if Canada started allowing political refugees from the states

    • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      My fear would be our MAGAts would lie tou you, claim they were never MAGA, get in, and start the same shit there.

      • overcooked_sap@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Just so you know, Canada’s version of the NSA actually hosted NSA staff or provided signal intelligence to US agencies so they could circumvent the “no spying on us citizens” part of many laws.

        We do know how to profile people and have done it internally quite well for some time. Our blind spot is more international due to being the US lapdog. But that will change soon enough.

      • Bonzaibongo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        they would have to scrub their entire social medias, they can barely work their iphones half the time.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s dumb. If there’s ever a Hitler-level problem a reasonably fit guy like him can just cross through the woods into canada in several places. Stay and fight. Elon’s defeat in Wisconsin today shows that as lame as it sounds, voting does work. If you actually do it.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      what do you mean “if there’s ever”? People are being blackbagged off the street in broad daylight by secret police and sent to torture prisons…

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah but that’s not going to entrench Trump’s power since those people can’t vote. I’m talking about stuff like Jan 6, but successful. Cancelling elections, arresting opposition candidates, etc. Everything they’re doing now will come to an end after the next election.

        • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Please tell me this user name and these comments are a bit.

          Moving abroad is different to giving up citizenship and doesn’t remove your right to vote or fund candidates.

          • rational_lib@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            In a sense it is a bit, in that it encourages people to call me out for being wrong as here. And in this case, I admit I made an assumption that is unclear in hindsight, which was that the guy was leaving permanently.

        • figjam@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m frequently warm and already married but the Dutch are super progressive with all that right?

      • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is no “EU” passport, only passports of countries in the EU. I’m pretty sure you have to be 18 to attempt to immigrate (although that doesn’t stop many teenagers from going for it by working under the table until they can get a legit job to sponsor them, and pls do not think I’m encouraging that!)

        • figjam@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m welllllll over 18. Usually most socialized medicine countries are less interested in you the older you are.

    • DrWorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d love to but I honestly have no idea where to start. That 30 percent ruling is interesting.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    209
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Neat. I wish I could do that. I tried several years ago when I actually had some money because I saw this coming. Nobody wanted disabled people then, and less so Americans now.

    People wouldn’t listen back then, when I was called hyperbolic and alarmist, and good fucking luck leaving now. People think leaving is easy – it’s not. We’re stuck in this shit show.

    Can’t fix it, can’t leave. Going down with the ship. Fuck everyone who voted to kill me. I will not survive this administration. I’ll probably die within the year because, though I worked my ass off in IT since the 90s, I had to burn through my savings by being weak enough to get sick. *I already have to choose between food and medicine, so I mostly don’t eat. I’ll just stop buying medicine.

    So fuck me, I deserve to die now. There’s no escape. There’s no hope.

    • CheeseToastie@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Lilly I’m so sorry this is happening and as a disabled woman, I get it. We’re bottom of the ladder, and nobody cares. Feel free to lean on the sisterhood in [email protected] we really do get it… it’s not much but its all I have to offer you.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most Americans have absolutely no clue how involved the immigration process actually is. Unless you have specific skills, have immediate family in the country you’re going, or are loaded… 95 times out of 100 you’re not going anywhere.

      Although where there’s a will there’s a way. You get a tourist visa, overstay, marry a local.

      I’m glad I’m a dual citizen with money stashed away in both the US and the country I was born. If shit gets too bad in the US, I can lay low elsewhere while things calm down.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yep… and if you managed to pass the initial barriers of immigration, but have elderly parents that you’re concerned about, there’s 0 chance they’re getting into the country you were allowed into unless they’re already loaded. That’s the only way for the elderly.

    • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just want to say i live in a safe area kinda and have room if you want to survive next 4 years in a progressive state in the middle of the woods but near jobs.

    • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 days ago

      For the small chance that you have german ancestors, you can claim back their citizenship if they suffered under the nazi regime

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        EDIT: see end of comment

        If you have any traceable Italian citizenship it is possible to claim Italian citizenship. Even like great-great-great-great-grandparents. But there’s a lot of asterisks involved. There are offices that specialize in this that might help (for a fee).

        But if you DO qualify and get all the paperwork and get an appointment and approved, you get full citizenship immediately. Italy always considered you a citizen since birth but did not know about you.

        EDIT:

        Italy put a stop to this like, a few days ago. Damn. Now it’s maximum grandparents. https://www.imidaily.com/europe/italy-adopts-decree-restricting-citizenship-by-descent/

        Should’ve figured with all the anti-immigrant sentiment this would be ending soon.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          It has 60 days to be approved by parliament and there’s a lot of squawking about it being unconstitutional by immigration attorneys. As gross as it is, the more nationalist fucks are also against it for fairly racist reasons. They can’t stand the idea of Muslims getting citizenship before anyone else 🤮

          I’m hoping if it does pass, it’ll still leave a route to citizenship for Italian descendants. We were literally getting ready to file when this dropped.

      • TylerBourbon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        wish that were true if you had Dutch ancestors. My maternal Grandfather immigrated with his parents when he was a little boy and came through Ellis Island. I’ve tried looking before, but from what I could, that wouldn’t qualify me for Dutch citizenship, sadly. Otherwise, I’d probably jump at it.

        • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          You might be able to get permanent residence first and then apply for citizenship. I recall meeting a Canadian in Amsterdam who did that.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Welsh, Scottish, Danish, exclusively. It’s funny, because one side came here in the early 1600s and was the first person to get capital punishment in this country (tried to sell the Bronck’s Farm, was hanged ‘til nearly dead, ear cut off, then banished to New Jersey), then another was Postmaster General and Secretary of the Interior – heritage is weird. And it doesn’t always pass on, no matter what these purists think.

        You don’t inherit value, you create it.

        e: to the DMers/downvoters:

        This guy

        And this guy (my great uncle, grandpa’s brother)

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah it’s really hard. Most won’t qualify.

      If you’re a skilled researcher or tenured professor you have a better shot but it will still not be easy.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 days ago

      scientists are usually the first target of when a dictator takes power, they often leave before shit hits the fan. then it goes to POC, and then lgbtq+, and then non-loyalists.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Controlling the universities is for control of information.

        The Nazis could easily burn down the Institute of Sex Research and all it contents. Today’s fascists cannot burn down the science on queer people and global warming.

        Universities have smart people who can say “hey this is the way your economic policies are harming this group of people” or “being LGBT is a normal human variation” or “the American civil war was fought over slavery” or “here are characteristics that seem to be common to every incarnation of fascism, and how they all seem to be related to what’s happening now.”

        The idiot arm attacks knowledge online with Alex Jones style “information warfare” - just repeating insane falsehoods over and over again. Never playing defense, always flooding the web with lies and half truths. This is also why fascists love AI so much. (How much time do people waste arguing with bots? And the amount of bots makes these ideas seem more “normal” and common then they are…)

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        It kinda seems like immigrants and anti-war protesters made it to the top of the list this time.

        • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Beat me to it. How you could say the scientists are the first to go while they are putting legal residents that have done nothing into el Salvadorian prisons is beyond me.

          • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            They didn’t say scientists are the first target, they said scientists are usually the first target. Didn’t say that they were the first target in this case.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s really fucking difficult, but I’m grateful for the opportunity I have right now. For everyone’s sake I really hope the biue states wake up and realize that they’re not getting anything out of the Union

      • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        The goal will be to send Americans to die in war in Greenland and other countries through drafts. They will use American citizens to fight against the allied nations of World War Two. They will send you to die against your friends. Open your fucking eyes.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Seriously. I wonder why European countries aren’t massively jumping on this opportunity. Like every developed country, the nations of Europe need immigrants to prop up their demographics. Most of Europe’s immigrants have been coming from countries in the global South. And while such immigrants have done well for the nations of Europe, there will always be less friction in bringing in immigrants from countries of more similar culture. Fuck any racists who hate Muslims. But the cold truth is it’s probably a lot easier to integrate large numbers of politically liberal Americans into European countries than it is to integrate immigrants from Muslim countries. European countries desperately need immigration, but right wing politics is on the rise, in large part due to the frictions of immigration. Obviously American and European cultures are not the same; there are still very real cultural differences. But European vs. American culture is far closer than many other cultural pairings out there.

        European countries do have some very limited ancestry-based immigration policies. But they usually only go back a generation or two. If your parent or grandparent immigrated from a European country to the US, you can get easy immigration in a lot of EU countries. But for most Americans of European descent, that immigration happened generations ago.

        If the EU countries were clever right now, they could take advantage of this opportunity to bring in large numbers of disaffected Americans. They could offer relocation assistance, make it cheap and easy for educated American progressives to pack their bags and jump the pond. And in exchange they get workers in their economies they don’t have to train to educate, and immigrants who would assimilate quite readily into the existing cultural milieu.

        Hell, personally, I’m a typical American in that I have a hodgepodge of European ancestry. But my ancestors came over before 1900, there’s nowhere in Europe I qualify for immigration based on ancestry. But if one of the countries my ancestors came from wanted to made it cheap and easy for me to return to the old country, I would jump on that.

        Hell, the politics of it sell itself. Bill it politically as “bringing the European diaspora home.”

        • illegible@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Funny there was a town/region in Norway (i think, it’s been a long time) that had proposed such a plan. I thought it was Ringke or somesuch, but it came off as really racist, like the “we only want the white ones back” sort of thing. Not sure what became of it.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah it’s a political tight rope. And you definitely wouldn’t want to put in place any kind of horrific race or skin color requirements. You don’t want some nightmare Nazi-esque racial fraction rule. Literally just, “did you have an ancestor from this country? Ok, you can come here.” And yeah, if Norway decides to do that, then there will be some black Americans who happen to have some Norwegian ancestors who want to move there. And you have to be OK with that. There aren’t millions of pure-blooded Norwegian Americans sitting around in the US eagerly waiting their chance to return to the homeland. There are instead people like myself. I have ancestors from all over Western Europe. The single biggest chunk of my ancestry is Norwegian, but that piece is still only like 1/4 of my ancestors. I have ancestors from Norway, Germany, France, England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, and bunch of places I don’t even know about. For all intents and purposes, my ancestry is just “generic white American.” American was once called “the great melting pot” for a reason.

            It’s a political tight rope. There’s a good argument to be made for it from a purely practical perspective. If immigrants are needed, why not recruit immigrants from countries that are most similar to yours culturally? Sure, Norway and the US aren’t as similar as Norway and Denmark. But there aren’t tons of Danish immigrants just waiting for a chance to move to Norway. And while not the same, Norway and the US are a hell of a lot more similar than Norway and Afghanistan are.

            If Norway imports 100,000 disaffected politically liberal Americans, how many mosques do you think those new immigrants are going to want to build there? Most probably won’t even be religious, and most of those that are will just help fill the pews of the already half-empty Norwegian churches. There’s nothing wrong with building mosques. But again, we’re talking about cultural friction here. Too much change too quick, and people feel like their culture is being replaced, and they start voting for reactionary politicians. One population intrinsically causes less disruption in integration than another. And if you need immigrants, why not select from those immigrants that can most easily assimilate into the existing culture? Normally this is a moot point. There normally isn’t a potential reserve of millions of culturally-similar immigrants that European countries could draw upon. But right now, due to the political situation in the US, there actually are millions of such potential culturally-similar immigrants.

            There’s a good practical argument, but it’s hard to make the case without making yourself sound like a militant racist.

        • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It seems like the obvious solution is to use education and career experience to bring folks over that will support their economies. The side benefit will be relatively good cultural alignment. No need to bring race into this at all, just do the brain drain.

        • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          But the cold truth is it’s probably a lot easier to integrate large numbers of politically liberal Americans into European countries than it is to integrate immigrants from Muslim countries

          I genuinely don’t think it makes a big difference for like 99% of immigrants. The process is pretty much the same. Gotta find work, a home and learn the language. The cultural friction you mentioned mostly affects the immigrants themselves rather than society as a whole.

          Plus there are already ways for Americans to move here, especially skilled workers. There are some hurdles of course but it’s doable. Don’t really see why we should make it any easier except for potential refugees like Latin Americans and queer people.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            At an individual level you are right. But this is more an issue with numbers. Immigrants do not just bring themselves; they also bring their culture. Think of it this way. Let’s say Germany decides to bring over a million politically disaffected American progressives. How many mosques do you think those million people will want to build in their new home? Maybe one or two, there will be some Muslims in that group. But most of those million won’t even be religious. And most of those that are will just help fill the pews of half-empty German churches. There won’t be a titanic shift in the German religious landscape from these million American immigrants.

            Immigration starts having issues not at the individual level, but the societal level. Too many immigrants too quickly, and people start feeling like their culture is being replaced. The slower assimilation happens, the more people start feeling like their culture is being replaced. The more culturally different the immigrant population is from the native population, and the more people feel like their culture is being replaced. And the more people feel like their culture is being replaced, the more they start voting for hard right parties like AfD.

            There’s nothing wrong with Muslims or with people building mosques. But I mention mosques because they are a highly visible symbol of immigrant populations with very different cultures, a symbol that right wing politicians gleefully exploit.

            If Germany brings over a million disaffected Americans, what culturally disruptive things will they bring? I guess Germany will get some more McDonalds franchises and a few other American brands? But those million Americans really aren’t going to stir things up too much. It’s not like you’re going to let the Americans bring their guns with them. They’ll have to leave those behind. And the big gun nuts aren’t likely to take Germany up on its immigration offer in the first place.

            And just due to genetics, give it a generation or two, and you won’t even able to tell who is descended from those immigrants without checking ancestry records. The first generation will be noticeably American, but the second, third, or fourth? Indistinguishable from the native German population. Completely assimilated.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wouldn’t say this put loud until I’m in Canada, but yeah. Leave while you can

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m a US American who has been considering expatriating, but its too expensive.

    Can someone tell me if my passport gets pulled, do I not have to pay the expatriation tax on my net worth?

  • espentan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    love America because it doesn’t have kings

    I’m not convinced a president who can act with greater impunity than a king in any modern monarchy is better.

    I read that a lot, “we don’t have a king, thank cod”. Is it because you’ve seen what a hell hole e.g. the Scandinavian countries are? /s

    A king in a modern monarchy is nothing more than a representative of the country. He cuts ribbons and holds encouraging speeches on New Year’s. That’s pretty much it.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      That doesn’t mean we want one

      A strong Parliament/Congress and judicial system is what keeps any executive in check. We’ve just got the worst of both worlds.

      • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The role of a monarch in modern countries is to be a ruler in name only, that way there is no place for another wannabe ruler. There can be only 1.

          • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It was historically what they agreed to. That is their purpose in modern times. Not hard to understand.

            • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              That is the purpose they adopted to continue to live at taxpayer expense.

              Also not that hard to understand, yall Europeans can be backwards af about this.

              • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m not European. You’ll understand fast enough why many countries do this when the US gets a wannabe king, because the position isn’t taken 😂

                • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Lmao okay so you’re implying that any State without a monarch is susceptible to someone claiming a nonexistent crown? Like its some sort of natural law like entropy?

                  No fam we’ll just kill him

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Back when the Queen was still alive, Stephen Fry described her role as being “as if Uncle Sam was a real person.” Meaning, being a sort of personification of the country without actually holding any real power over it. I’m not a huge fan of the British monarchy, but if we have to have one I’m at least glad it’s limited to being essentially a powerless tourist attraction.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      While Fuck Trump, there is something deeply disturbing and creepy about constitutional monarchs.

      You don’t think that amongst their families in quiet hushed tones, they discuss and yearn for the prospect of returning to real power someday? They’re basically tyrants-in-waiting. They’re just quietly hanging out in the background, waiting for some crisis in democracy, some loss of confidence in the system, etc. Then, when confidence in democracy is at some historical nadir, they can sweep in and restore themselves to power and glory.

      They’re vultures. They’re just biding their time, living the high life, pretending to be kind, benevolent, and harmless. Yet deep in their heart of hearts, they yearn for the power they know was taken from them. They know their ancestors had it. And they want it back.

      You don’t think it could happen? Democracy hasn’t existed in European countries for all that long. There are many examples historically of royal restorations where royal houses returned to power, after periods out of power far longer than the existence of many European constitutional monarchies. The idea of a royal restoration returning the King of Norway to real power seems absurd. But by historical standards it’s really not that absurd. Monarchy in Europe existed as a tradition for over a thousand years. Constitutional monarchy is just 1-2 centuries old, or less, in most European countries. Rome’s Republic lasted half a millennia before it collapsed into an absolute monarchy. Don’t dismiss the idea that the monarchs could return to power. I have little doubt that most of today’s constitutional monarchs secretly dream and fantasize about the idea.

      And that’s what’s so creepy about them. They may claim to truly believe in democracy. But if they really did, they would give up their crowns entirely. No one who really believes in democracy could accept a position that puts them as a monarch, someone entrusted by power from right of birth. Democracy begins with the proposition that all human beings are created equal. A monarch, however limited in power, is anathema to this. I don’t care how constrained that power is. You cannot truly believe in democracy while serving as a monarch. In their hearts, every “constitutional monarch” dreams of the slim chance that they might see a royal restoration. They are vultures, simply waiting for democracy to get sick and stumble.

      Truly, the French and the Soviets had the right idea on how to deal with royalty. Give up your crown or give up your head. That is how you deal with kings properly.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        2022 German coup d’état plot

        In December 2022, German authorities foiled a far-right coup attempt orchestrated by members of the Reichsbürger (Citizens of the Reich) movement, a group that denies the legitimacy of modern Germany and seeks to restore the German Empire. The plot involved plans to overthrow the federal government, storm the Bundestag (parliament), and install Heinrich XIII Prince Reuss, a descendant of the former German aristocracy, as the new head of state. The conspirators envisioned a monarchist government modeled on the pre-World War I German Reich

    • notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 days ago

      Canaries were taken into coal mines to warn the miners of poisionous gasses by dropping dead. When the canary metaphorically picks the lock on its metaphorical cage and literally makes a break for the border, I think you can consider that a sign of a similar magnitude.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’ll take a lot more than words and guns

    A whole lot more than riches and muscle

    The hands of the many must join as one

    And together we’ll cross the river