https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/29191692

I don’t even know what to think about this one. I’m not angry, more confused than anything. There’s only one mod there so i asked them, and they said “It’s against policy. It’s the abbreviations policy.”

I see no such policy anywhere, so who knows what’s going on. Is it only the NYT that can’t be abbreviated? What about the US? Is LOL forbidden too? And if so, why are we forbidden from laughing there!

They didn’t even remove the comment.
The mod is user qrstuv. Maybe the only abbreviation allowed is when they say one? That’s a power trip!

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    A pet peeve of mine is when people randomly throw acronyms around expecting everyone to just know what it means, but this is taking the piss.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    I recall commenting last time this community came up that it was weird that NYT was allowed when other abbreviations were not. I guess their mod caught up. It’s a dumb rule, but even ignoring that, it’s not listed in the community!

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    It gets dumber:

    The user was banned for saying “mark my words”. And in the context it is clearly not some sort of threat, just an “I’m 100% sure of that”.

    PTB. [USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST]

    • TachyonTele@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      The mod is just a flat out troll. They’ve proven that for sure during this drama-fest.

      They run a news comm and ban anyone that comments before they can lock the post. It’s very strange and, quite frankly, pretty dumb.

  • kipo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    I wonder if using the word taxi, instead of taximeter cabriolet, will prompt a ban.

        • buffaloboobs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          close. “Cab” is derived from extracting the first syllable from Steve Caballeros’ last name. not just one of the great skaters, his family also invented the modern car and public transportation. so, as you can see, that is why when you rent out half of a taxi, you say, “I’m doin’ a ‘half cab!’” rather than a ca or an ab, as those are each ⅔ of a cab.

          the math starts getting pretty wonky, when you get into renting tiny fractions of caballeros, which is why the Cabernet was invented - to make the entire process more straight forward.

          hope that clears up everything!

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      If I were a mod, I’d ban anyone who used “taximeter cabriolet” on sight. /s

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m a member of the SDF instance and I’ve reported this. I hope it gets attention and action. I don’t appreciate someone making us look like clowns.

    • courval@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      You forgot the /s this is the Internet and some people like OP will take you seriously…

    • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      yea I don’t know what’s going on with that comm and/or moderation. In general sdf seems to be one of the lightest-touch-moderated instances out there so this is really surprising

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        People don’t seem to differentiate much between an instance and its individual communities, even if the instance has a really light touch with mods.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        After unblocking it I realized I recognize a bunch of people on SDF. You guys and gals are pretty solid. Except for this one person.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I blocked the entire instance because of this. Why would i want to read posts i can’t even take part in, you know.

      Thank you for letting us know that person isn’t the entire instance. I’ll unblock it.

  • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    I see no such policy anywhere

    It’s there. You just missed it because the rule is abbreviated.

    See, in this timeline, the rules about abbreviation can be abbreviated, but not content.

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    You really want a laugh, go look at the mod log on any community on dubvee.org

    It’s like that instance was created for the sole purpose of scale testing high volumes of bans.

    It’s like they have a whole system for synchronizing instance wide bans from comments made in other communities on other instances in the fediverse.

    • Rowan Thorpe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Having been inspired by the Core Wars at an impressionable age, I just thought of a truly perverted version that could be enacted on a dedicated Lemmy “shitpost” community. The community would have a committee-designed list of moderation rules (including that nonsense, irrelevant or data-flooding posts/comments are ban-worthy), and teams would develop LLM-based agents as the Lemmy-bot equivalent of Core War “redcode”. The two bots would be simultaneously unleashed on the channel as the only posters, commenters, and mods, armed with internet-access to find links for posting and commenting on. Every time a bot does a ban on the opposing bot the game is paused for the human adjudicators to decide if the ban is valid based on conversational context. A bot wins a round when it achieves 3 valid bans, or when the opposing bot reaches 3 invalid bans. A yearly tournament could be held. The winning team’s bot would have to be exceptionally good at finding & posting links, and reading & commenting on them, and replying to opposition comments in ways that induce the opposing bot into footgunning in bannable ways. I think it would be critically important to not give the bots access to the Dark Web when finding links to post, otherwise things would get harrowingly nasty really fast.

  • Skunk@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    There’s been another post about the same community (or was it same instance?) a week or two ago.

    I remember the bans were because of NYT, USAID and probably others.

    I don’t know if we had any explanation of what the fuck (sorry, meant to write ‘WTF’) is happening over there.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    They’ve locked every post so I guess they don’t really want any community whatsoever.