• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    5 days ago

    In a video game, whatever allowed them to become billionaires would have been called an “exploit” and would have been nerfed in the next patch.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean its worse than that. Youd need to work at a rate of 16,600/hr, 24 hours a day for 2,000 years to get even close to Elon Musk

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      But if you got $5000 at 0.7% yearly interest rate for 2000 years, you’d get to Musk’s wealth. You can only get that high with compound interest with investments, rather than earning money.

    • jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      5 days ago

      Virtually everyone fails to grasp exactly how large of a number a billion is. It’s so, so much bigger than the ”very big number” people think of when they hear the word.

      • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 days ago

        A million seconds is a little over 11 days.

        A billion seconds is a little over 31 years.

        Billionaires should be required to count out their dollars individually every few days.

      • skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I wonder if world class mathematicians have a much better grasp of it — and yet fail to use their expertise to point out the absurdity of the current wealth inequality

        Or do even they, world class mathematicians, not really ‘grasp’ it in this wildly important and urgent sense.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      100% and, more so, thats not just a billion in cash, of course. Thats a billion dollars worth of stuff that makes you money, that can be sold off for at least a billion, most likely far more.

      When people read these valuations, they often think to themselves “surely they can’t be worth that much” and they’re right. It will always be much, much more. Other than Trump, wealth valuations are always very, very conservative, due to the nature of how they do it, and thats before we get to the fact that they’re only estimating their wealth on the assets that are publicly disclosed.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 days ago

    But if you made just 3% interest on your money as you deposit $1,825,000 annually, over 532 years, you’d end up having $410 trillion dollars or more than 2,000 bezos.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          And in a position to be able to lose it. High interest are high because they are risky, so they have to pay well to attract investing. If you already have enough money to burn, you can put money into various high risk areas and win overall. If you only have enough to sink it into a single source, you could gain. Or not.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Index funds are pretty incredibly safe. Pick one of the big US indexes and look at the graph since before the global financial crisis

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            If you already have enough money to burn, you can put money into various high risk areas and win overall.

            That’s the angel investor strategy.

            There’s also lower risk index funds, that simply invest in the biggest N companies.

          • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            As long as you keep that money in index funds like MSCI World, S&P500 or DAX, you can wait out the bad times. Never sell, keep holding. Over decades this leads to large net profits.

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        you just need to have unlimited time, at 3% annual interest, it takes 77.89 years to 10x your money. it just happens that 532 years is 6.8 times 77.89 years, therefore you would just put a 1 million multiplier on your money anyways. And putting 1 million multiplier on 1 million dollars is enough to become a trillionaire anyways

        At 3% interest, you double your money every 23.4 years, how many 23.4 years do you have?

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        thats why investments are inportant for long term. the problem we face as a society is that the majority of people cant afford to make these investments, as they are living day to day with their paychecks.

    • skibidi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      2000 Bezos or about 4x the GDP of the planet.

      People just need to invest and stop blaming others for being broke SMH.

      Invest one penny at 3% per year, who can’t afford one penny? You’ll have $68 billion in just one thousand years. Poverty is a choice.

    • foggianism@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      yeah but 1.8 mil 532 years ago would have been valued like billions today. so you still need to be a billionaire to become that rich

      • elrik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not really with that amount of time. Suppose you put away $1,000 a year for 532 years, at 3% you still end up with $225 billion.

        The deposits are completely dwarfed by the compounding interest. If you only start with $1,000 and add nothing else but let that original $1,000 compound at 4% you’ll have over $1 trillion.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Where are you getting 4% annual compound returns, though? That’s faster than the historical growth in global GDP over the equivalent time period.

          • elrik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yes, it’s equally as unrealistic as leaving money idle for 532 yrs.

            The only point I was making was that multiplying $5,000 a day by so many years is a silly comparison as it ignores the dominating factors to building wealth.

            Billionaires shouldn’t exist but also they don’t exist because they stuff X dollars under their mattress every day.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              multiplying $5,000 a day by so many years is a silly comparison

              Sure.

              it ignores the dominating factors to building wealth

              It ignores the existence of wealth by focusing on income. And it neglects where income comes from.

              Billionaires shouldn’t exist but also they don’t exist because they stuff X dollars under their mattress every day.

              Something of a joke about the modern billionaire is how much debt they’re carrying around. You don’t become a billionaire by having a high salary. You become a billionaire by getting access to enormous volumes of low interest credit, in order to monopolize a limited stock of productive capital. It isn’t like being an employee with a sky-high salary so much as it is a member of an elite club with access to amenities nobody else is allowed to use.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Same. There’s no gold standard, money is a social construct.

        I wonder if the people who think like this, also assume “if bezos had less money, I’d have more”.

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    For the curious you’d make 970million in the 532years. Jeff bozos net worth is about 200 billion. You’d need an annual interest rate of about 2.12% to reach 200billion over that period, assuming you spend none of it, if you took an annual income of 20k then you’d only be at 135billion at the end of the period.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      so i couldn’t even spend any of it ?

      that’s rubbish billionaire. unless i could use it to leverage banks to give me loans off of national credit programs.

      and still then i’d just prefer not to.

      i feel badly for people who can’t get ever seem to get enough.

  • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    I bet for a long while you’d be like, “What even are dollars?”, since they hadn’t been invented yet.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nevermind dollars. What about inflation? $5000/day in 1900 would be worth $187,000 today. That’s $68M/year.

      You’d need, what? 15 years to get a billion at that rate. You’d also be accusing money faster than Rockefeller.

      I have to wonder where all that wealth would even be coming from.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Presumably the same place real rich people get it today. Gradually inflating the currency so that even if they’re not directly stealing from you the increase in their wealth comes from the lessening of value of your, mine, and everyone elses money.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Gradually inflating the currency

          Gradual inflation that happens under the national growth rate is fine. You need more currency moving at a faster rate in an expanding economy.

          Gradual inflation in a contracting national growth rate is a huge problem.

          Thomas Picketty lays this all out mathematically in “Capitalism in the 21st Century”, and builds a strong economic case for a high graduated tax rate as a means of tying inflation back to real economic growth.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’d also be accusing money faster than Rockefeller.

        It was the 20 dollar bill that killed the butler, with a candelabra in the hall!

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have a hard enough time getting my head around how much money $100B is already. Like, I don’t even see numbers above the hundreds of thousands ever (usually on loans, like my mortgage), so the idea that some of these people could buy my house 100,000+ times over, and I will spend years, paying for it once, is hard enough.

      Wealth hoarding has gotten way out of hand.

    • Hobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Okay but in fairness if you put like 1% of that money virtually anywhere but under your matress you’d probably be richer than Bezos now. Even at like 3% interest of a $18,250 compunded over 530 years you’d have about half of Bezos’ net worth.

  • lurklurk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Although if you did earn $5k per day and managed to invest at a yearly return of 3% above inflation, you’d have about $41 trillion

    At 1% above interest you’d just have $3.6 billion so invest wisely

    (edit, corrected the numbers)

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Okay so then how is he worth that much?

    These memes and stories are like, “its unbelievable that Bezos is worth so much money”, no it makes perfect sense!

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Okay so then how is he worth that much?

      Easy: He birthed himself into a rich family. Classical self made billionaire

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        But his parents weren’t super rich billionaires, were they? No one had a hundred billion dollars before, he didnt get it all from his parents, where did he get it all?

        • lugal@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          The answer is hard work.

          Not his own hard work, obviously, the the hard work of the workers he exploited

            • lurklurk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              amazon grows its revenue → amazon stock value increases → amazon share holder richer

              Many companies also pay dividends directly to the share holder but iirc Amazon has preferred to reinvest in growth

        • lurklurk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Amazon has been really successful in several domains and he’s owned a lot of it from the start

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            How does owning something turn into hundreds of billions of dollars? I own things too, they don’t turn into hundreds of billions

                • psud@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Amazon: people like books; people like next day delivery of stuff; people and companies like making stuff and running stuff in Amazon web services

                  Minecraft: Marcus Persson owned the game studio (and wrote quite a bit of the game) that made Minecraft, lots of people like it, Microsoft was willing to buy it for billions

                  Kiran Mazumdan-Shaw made beer, people like beer. They then used beer making processes to make biotech medicines - people like being alive and will pay a lot to stay alive, or even just a bit healthier

                • iii@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It’s not an elementary question.

                  Best I can guess is: plenty of people, plenty of reasons. Which is a stupid answer.

              • Juice@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Is that how value is determined? How others perceive value? Isn’t that kind of subjective? Is there a possibility he isn’t worth that much money? Could he be worth even more? Not like margin of error, but dramatically more or less like 20-30% off one way or the other?

        • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          No but if you start with millions and invest it or make interest on it you have a lot more options and opportunities to make more money.

          If you start with nothing you are just blocked out of that all together. It’s why I’m having such a hard time starting my own business. I have to pay all my bills so my time goes to that instead of what would actually make me successful.

            • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I’m an artist of sorts. I make interactive art kind of like games so I want to open a gallery space with a bar where I can have people come and try my experiences.

              They are similar to arcade games but they have physical dioramas with transparent screens inside as the game levels. You control your character or whatever the game calls for with your phone. My current iteration uses multiple screens and diorama as well as physical objects for a single experience. Kind of like a Metroidvania style game.

              I have so many ideas for larger experiences I could build with all of the stuff I have learned making these crazy games. My goal would be to make an experience that takes about an hour to complete. Similar to an escape room except you’re not locked in a room. Maybe more tiki bar vibes where the scenery of the bar is interactive too.

              All of my free time when I’m not working or doing family stuff goes into making the art for these games and it’s hard to then come up with the time and money to get a space and advertise. Plus I have a family to support. So I work full time as a software engineer making someone else’s boring idea. While my fun innovative ideas get less of my attention lol.

              I feel my only hope is to get an investor or something but then I have to deal with all that comes with that.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        His parents were not all that well off. They invested $300,000 in his new company. That’s within the ability of many middle class workers

        His parents were employees, not business owners.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Plenty of people in that situation who aren’t Bezos rich, no?

        Makes me think that explanation isn’t sufficient.

        • zea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s not sufficient, but it is necessary. They also have to invest (AKA owning the means of production, wonder why that’s so profitable…)

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s not sufficient, but it is necessary

            It certainly helps a lot!

            But again, there’s something different about them. that made them different from many others from a similar start.

            Wonder what it could be

    • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Recipe for a billionaire includes:

      • (optional) being born wealthy
      • Exploitation of others
      • luck

      Billionaires like to think they worked hard but in reality they exploited others and were lucky in some form or another. Exploitation comes from paying workers as little as possible and/or having such terrible work conditions to maximize efficiency to the point that who cares if someone dies working. Fighting unions and keeping costs down (including pay) means more profit. It also means you can charge less to force other competitors out of business unless they can do the same amount of exploiting to keep costs down.

      Beyond that, there’s just general business and economic concepts like operating at scale which luck or generational wealth can help shortcut there.

      • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Being born wealthy isn’t really optional. It’s actually necessary and a big reason why this system is so absolutely terrible, because the American dream is a capitalist myth to manipulate the masses.

        The exceptions are not always exceptions, like the apartheid boy Elon and the 1 in a million that actually is an exception is drilled into our brains by the media like how gambling companies make ads about the people that win the lottery.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          There have been a couple (or maybe one or a few) that started with very little. A lot more had a gift or loan from a parent for enough to buy land or start a business, often that was less than $100,000

          As much as Musk’s family had money before, his initial big money came from his share of his brother and his city guide software “zip2” which they sold to Compaq for a few hundred million. Lots of people have made more complex or bigger programs with no more wealth than an average middle class family.

          Then x.com (the 1999 one, a bank) which became part of PayPal which sold to eBay for $1.5 billion which Musk got a share of

          Then he made SpaceX then Tesla* and Tesla made him a billionaire through his ownership of a large part of it

          *Tesla was made of Musk’s money and A/C Propulsion electric vehicle conversion system. It was incorporated with SpaceX’s incorporation papers with the company name changed. A/C propulsion’s drivetrain was replaced by a new system after a year of production of the roadster

        • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Being born wealthy can also just be wrapped into luck. But i separated it because it isn’t strictly required, however unlikely, to become a billionaire. Exploitation and luck in some form is required every time.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Having listened to ‘good bad billionaire’ for several episodes the formula is

      1. Create or inherit a company
      2. Do good at it
      3. Float it on the stock exchange
      4. Now own the bulk of a company whose stock values it at enough that your share is worth over a billion

      Or

      1. Make an insanely popular game
      2. Sell it to Microsoft

      Or

      1. Be the child of someone who did one of the above
    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t think this was meant for, obviously, really smart people like you. It is to give a sense of scale that a working person understands. The concept of a billion dollars isn’t easy for most people to actually comprehend.