‘It is rule 62 of the Olympic Charter that we have to have a condoms story,’ says IOC spokesman Mark Adams

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      Yeah sounds like PR at this point. They probably release this press message every year right when viewership and interest drops when the Olympics is halfway done.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If I was an athlete and there were condoms with Olympic logo branding getting handed out, I would SO hoard them for souvenirs. Can you imagine?

    They’re in Italy. There are farmacie all over the place. They can get store-brand ones.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Plus they’re officially branded, not some knockoff. It would be an amazing gag gift.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t see why condom companies aren’t shipping in truckloads for free. You can’t beat that kind of publicity. L

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I found myself in Italy
        They said we could have condoms free
        All partnered up by two or three
        Everyone partook with glee
        But now none are left for me

        So hearken friends
        My luck portends
        This story ends
        For me unfortunately

        I skied directly into a tree
        Then rolled the dice in the dormitory
        It now burns badly when I pee
        I hope my mom is proud of me
        I only brought home an STD

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That’s less than 4 per athlete, not sure why they thought that would be enough.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They ended up only having a little over 2 per athlete after Condoms Georg took 4,000 for balloon animals.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          Why do you specify “male” athlete?

          Unless being used for onanism, it’s one condom per couple, although trios and other combos, and non penetrative sex probably fudge the math a little).

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    13 hours ago

    While I don’t doubt many athletes are being quite active.
    I’d also believe it’s a joke at this point for them to all take as many as they can no matter if they intend to use them or not.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      A few years ago an athlete said in an interview that they are Olympics branded condoms, so he stuffed his backpack full of them

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There was an article a few years ago where a few athletes were interviewed anonymously IIRC. It’s a fuckfest. You put a lot of people in peak physical shape together, what are you expecting?

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Also people who by and large havent been out living wild social lives for quite a while. Laser beam focused on one goal. Once you have competed, one way or another the pressure is off and you are surrounded by people who are in the exact same position.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      this is how you get more olympians.

      If enough people are in the market, have egg or sperm donor companies call people who medal.

      considers

      Looking down the road, because my expectation is that sooner or later, we’re going to be doing human genetic engineering, a company getting Olympian genetic material like that might be — as long as they can operate in a legal jurisdiction that doesn’t prohibit human genetic engineering — better off just calling up medalists and licensing their DNA. I don’t think that you can copyright DNA under current US case law, though it might be patentable.

      investigates

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_genetic_sequences

      As of 2016, genetic sequences were not recognized as copyrightable subject matter by any jurisdiction.[3] The United States Copyright Office’s position is that “DNA sequences and other genetic, biological, or chemical substances or compounds, regardless of whether they are man-made or produced by nature,” are ideas, systems, or discoveries rather than copyrightable works of authorship.[15]: 23

      You might not need to copyright or patent it, though, if you can just keep the changes you make secret. I mean, you get sperm/egg from Random Person, you do your proprietary modifications, you generate an embryo, you implant. I’m not sure how hard it would be for some other company to reverse-engineer the changes by looking at people’s DNA relative to background noise in the DNA.

      searches

      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33095042/

      A large majority of countries (96 out of 106) surveyed have policy documents-legislation, regulations, guidelines, codes, and international treaties-relevant to the use of genome editing to modify early-stage human embryos, gametes, or their precursor cells. Most of these 96 countries do not have policies that specifically address the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos in laboratory research (germline genome editing); of those that do, 23 prohibit this research and 11 explicitly permit it. Seventy-five of the 96 countries prohibit the use of genetically modified in vitro embryos to initiate a pregnancy (heritable genome editing). Five of these 75 countries provide exceptions to their prohibitions. No country explicitly permits heritable human genome editing.

      The thing is that in practice, if you want in vitro implantation, you can probably just travel abroad to a jurisdiction that doesn’t prohibit it, unless countries assert extraterritorial jurisdiction that attaches to their citizens. If someone wants an Olympianized kid, I imagine that traveling abroad isn’t that much additional barrier. Extraterrorial jurisdiction exists, but it is very rare; prohibitions on child sex tourism are one notable example that a number of countries do.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction

      EDIT: Replaced the text and citation for the legal overview, as it looks like the earlier link was to a spam site that copied it.

        • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Eugenics have a bad rep since they were popularized by nazis. But hey - animal rights and identification documents were also initially nazi ideas and they gained traction.

          I just hope, that when eugenics come back to public light again, they will come out of EU (regulated to hell and back) instead of USA or China. It’s one thing to eliminate genetic diseases or such, but completely another thing with steering people into some dystopian genetic hellhole.

        • stephan262@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I have a feeling it’s gonna be a long road, getting from here to there with eugenics. I’d much rather use technology to overcome our limitations.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I would like to overcome my limitations in this fashion. Aside from my tongue and naughty bits, the human body doesn’t offer me any experience that I enjoy.

              • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                It would be like Robot Wars, but with a lot more strategies. Rock wall climb? Hover boots, piledriver spikes, gecko skin, and so on. Someone should make an anime or show focused on robosports.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      12 hours ago

      For what it’s worth, there are more people at the summer Olympics than the winter ones (~10,500 in Paris and ~2,900 at Milan according to Wikipedia) but still one would think there should at least be 1/4 as much if they’re just looking at athlete numbers alone.

      • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        12 hours ago

        10k for 20 days of olympic and for 3k athletes that is 10k * 2 / 20 / 3k = 1/3 of a condom per couple per day, that sounds down right reasonable for a bunch of young, perfectly shaped teenagers constantly in celebration mode.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Young, fit and healthy athletes, following intense build up and cumulative training are ready to peak explosively, just about now.

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Best souvenir going. But also a lot of young people in peak physical condition. As someone I know commented “everyone is 10/10 from the neck down.”

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    10’000 is super low, I remember hearing about one or two hundred thousand in recent years. I guess that was regular and not winter, but still. No wonder they ran out.

    • X@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Winter Olympics, probably fewer people than the summer Olympics, where they had 300k.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Check who took them. Could be people from poorer countries, where condoms are expensive.

    Could be random religious zealots who are envious (or worse) of people actually heaving sex.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      10k literally just isn’t enough. Summer Olympics where there are 3-4x more athletes tend to have hundreds of thousands in stock.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I’m astounded so many of you cannot pick up the sarcasm in, “it’s okay to get AIDS” and “women what?”

        At times, I swear the levels of acumen here flirt with Facebook’s.

        • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think Lemmy has a higher than average percentage of neurotypical people who don’t pick up sarcasm at all.

        • X@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I’m astounded you’d assume the average sarcasm detection acuity would be much different here than on Facebook.

          There’s no correlation between having a federated account and high sarcasm detection success. Poe’s law wasn’t developed out of sheer boredom.

          • saltesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It has nothing to do with one’s ability to detect text tone better than another cohort. It is simply using the brain for a split second to evaluate which is more likely; a pro-AIDS misogynistic Lemmy user, or someone taking the piss on the fact Lemmy users are much the opposite.

            It is clearly “Amiright, guys?” character humour and really only requires some minimal effort to realise that.

            Though, at this point it really doesn’t matter as those that think for themselves by looking at what others thought (the vote counters) will contribute by following suit.

            • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              which is more likely; a pro-AIDS misogynistic Lemmy user, or someone taking the piss on the fact Lemmy users are much the opposite.

              I’ve been seeing users of a mgtow instance, so the first option really isn’t that unlikely.