

How else are we going to know who is at the door? I mean, I guess we could open it but that’s boring


How else are we going to know who is at the door? I mean, I guess we could open it but that’s boring


I think that any solution in the form of a formal government regulation will be subject to that kind of corruption, and real solutions need to be found elsewhere.
I think that’s a fair statement as it relates to the current US government but I don’t think that’s a valid general philosophy. I agree that our current priority should certainly be to implement a government that can be trusted to regulate things effectively. If that isn’t taken care of first then the rest doesn’t matter. As evidenced by, well, everything happening right now haha. Still, the ultimate goal should be government action on this topic because we cannot solve the problem at an individual level. Some people can have better outcomes than others but there’s no level playing field without government intervention.


Its perfectly relevant to my point, which is that the government is already involved in the sort of behavior we’re discussing. If we accept that preventing societal damage, or promoting social well being, or whatever else you want to call it, is a part of what the government exists to do, then why would something like preventing mega corporations from hijacking the development of children fall outside its purview?


I notice you left education off that list


How is this argument different from “it’s not the governments job to provide healthcare / education / social services”


To be fair, at that point we already knew he was a rapist. The new information was the gay stuff. Of course that’s going to be the most interesting part to everyone


I’m certainly not shocked that Trump posted some racist shit
You could say the same about ballet. Participants in both are athletic but they aren’t playing a sport


Knowing who they are is irrelevant until someone does something about it. Up to this point no one has.


Yeah, much better to say nothing and let them keep doing that to all the brown people because they’re not as important as the whites


I wish they would


I don’t mean to sound callous but if some relatively minor RCS issues, and there’s really no way they could be classified as major, stopped your friend from doing what he set out to do then he wasn’t all that invested in the idea.
I’m not saying there’s no problems with GrapheneOS or any other product helping consumers to change their habits but if you really care about issues like corporate overreach then a little inconvenience isn’t a deal breaker. In fact, it’s to be expected when switching away from mega corporations. They invest tons of money to make their user experience decent so that they can profit off of your data. If you want to get away from that you have to accept the fact that you’re moving away from a product supported by thousands of engineers with billions of dollars to spend towards a product developed by tens of engineers or less with very limited funding. Those developers do a damn good job IMO but a dip in ease-of-use has to be expected.
At the end of the day we all have to decide if we’re going to prioritize convenience or mindfulness. It sounds like your friend made his choice, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with the choice he made, I just think it’s important to put it in the proper perspective.


It does sound kind of like those randomly generated Xbox live usernames from back in the day


botulistic sausage
Epic new band name


Asked on CNN this morning whether Democrats were going to see to the unredacted files, Raskin said, “Absolutely.”
“We sent them a letter and so we’re demanding a right to do it. I hope the Department of Justice will keep its word and let us in there.”
Holy shit guys, they sent a letter. We got em now.
I could not muster a weaker response if I tried.


It’s a perfectly fair assumption given the fact that you’re attempting to equate two numbers that are multiple orders of magnitude apart for ideological reasons.
What sort of action should the world take against governments that murder protesters?


I think it’s self evident that 6 and 36,000 are not even close to the same number. Given the instance you are from I would like to ask a follow up question though. How do you feel about all the protesters killed by the Chinese and Russian governments? Do they matter as much as the Iranians or Americans killed by their respective governments?


If the US government killed 36,000 protesters I would probably want them to.


The point is that you don’t casually go about your routine during a civil war
To be fair, parenting is a pretty shitty gig. Expectations are high and support is low. People judge everything you do, especially those who have never done it themselves. Even with good kids its a thankless slog most of the time. God help you if you get a hard one.