• MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wether it’s on the internet or at a bar counter, I like to engage in debate to better myself. If your goal is to turn every fanatic that crosses your path, you’re gonna be depressed real soon.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      If your goal in an argument is to change the other person’s mind, then changing your mind (by taking in new information, learning, and understanding a different point of view) is seen as losing. That’s a terrible way to look at what is ultimately personal growth.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s no hope in changing the mind of every fanatic you come across.

      But we generally don’t have internet debates in DMs, we do it in public forums. The goal isn’t to sway the fanatics, it’s to publicly quash their arguments. To sway curious onlookers away from fanaticism before they become fanatics themselves.

      • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        People always forget about the lurkers. Most people with less-informed, more impressionable views on a given topic aren’t posting and debating, they’re reading and learning (despite the unfortunate exceptions). Seeing some wacko extremist nonsense or voter suppression tactic go unchallenged by a more reasonable argument may be enough to sway a not-yet-fanatic in the wrong direction.