• Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Those two skull outlines just look like they were photographed with a different focal length or something. There is no way skull morphology is this strongly affected by sex.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah… Like there’d be a bit more credence if the guy was going after the pelvis but… You’d have to either xray or extract the pelvis for that.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Even then there’s so much overlap in human dimorphism that it’s not an exact science, there’s still like a 5-10% error rate in sexing perfectly preserved pelvic bones. Accurate enough for anthropology, but that’s a big error rate to apply to individuals.

        • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          that’s my favorite fact for the “YoUr SkEleToN iS mAle!!1!” crowd. Also I’d be dead then, I won’t a shit if some teenagers put my skull in a bowling ball, much less being actually used for archeological research that benefits humanity lol