• DukeHawthorne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    It was never about “theft.” That hyped “theft” up as a cover to hide their own inept management.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I walked into walmart to buy underwear and socks, they were all in lockup. I opened the amazon app on my phone, matched up the exact thing I wanted that was behind glass and it showed up at my house the next for for approximately the same price.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        I think it’s just the next iteration of the detergent theft crap. Everyone needs socks and underwear; they’re stocked in bulk and are easy to resell.

      • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        underwear, deodorant, and toothpaste are commonly locked up where I’m from. it’s the most stolen stuff as it’s a basic need for the homeless

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sounds like his job should be converted to an AI bot. This fucker makes how much money, and didn’t identify any of the problems that regular people in this thread easily identified? Turn his role into AI. Save the share holders his salary.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They overbuilt because if a competitor opened a store, they’d open on right next to it…

      That strategy was never going to be profitable, they were trying to run competitors out of business.

      Most of those stores were going. To close for one reason or another, the growth wasn’t sustainable but it made stock prices go up and then they had to invent a reason to close store that would keep stock prices high.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There’s a retail strategy of putting products at your fingertips in the checkout aisle in order to entice you to buy it. Candy right next to you, so you’re munching on it when you leave the store. You feel good, they get money, no additional load on the staff.

      This is, effectively, the opposite strategy. Make getting your hands on anything annoying and difficult, increase the number of floor clerks you need to constantly unlock the shelf, and generally make the retail experience slower and more unpleasant.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Both are correct. It’s too expensive AND it doesn’t help sales. There are no reps around to unlock the doors, why would you wait to buy?

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Target near me has all the booze locked up. They have a button you can press to get an employee to open the cases for you to buy something. I waited 10 minutes for someone to come and open up the case to buy a bottle of Campari. Nobody ever showed up. I wrote Target to tell them I’ll be looking elsewhere from now on for any item they keep in a case.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If they had more than 2 people working at a time

      I don’t live in America but judging from what I heard, what is up with American stores manning the shops at bare minimum? Like, I heard so many complaints of self-service checkouts having no one staff looking after them, which leads to customers going to manned tills instead, because they couldn’t deal with technical issues especially for the seniors. Then when a senior is asked if they want to use automated checkouts instead, they reply with the snarky response “I don’t work here.” You can’t blame people for being reluctant to use the self-service checkouts, if there are no help! Where I live, there is always a staff looking after the self-service checkouts because of the inevitable technical issues or customers not knowing how to use them.

      My guess for this poor implementation of technology is because bosses think machines are meant to replace humans as workers, when realistically machines should help people with work. We don’t live in yet in a world where there are robots with the artifical intelligence as good as the human intelligence. And we are still way far from having robots with good dexterity skills as humans to completely replace us.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        what is up with American stores manning the shops at bare minimum?

        It all comes back to money > humans in this fucked up country.

        The business leaders don’t care about their customers. They will sell out the people they depend on if it makes the numbers 1% better. And then COVID taught them how they could make things even worse.

        But then the rest of the people don’t have enough respect for the employees, other customers, or themselves to demand better.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You can’t blame people for being reluctant to use the self-service checkouts, if there are no help!

        Much like with the locks on the storefronts, self-checkout is obnoxious in large part because the store owners don’t really trust you to swipe your own merchandise. The machines are constantly yelling at you for putting things on the wrong side of the machine or putting stuff in your basket before you finished checkout. And if you do anything wrong, the machine locks itself down so you can’t finish paying.

        Why should you need help at a self-checkout? Its contrary to the very premise of the system.

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t typically have this issue at Walmart at least. Their self checkout is smooth and effective these days.

          That said I still don’t use it, because it’s still shifting work to me without giving me compensation for it. If I got a discount for using the self checkout, sure, but I don’t. So I’ll keep using manned registers.

  • jg1i@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve tried asking for help, but the person I find doesn’t work in that department and the assigned person doesn’t show up for like 30 minutes. It’s faster to drive across town to the store that doesn’t have my item behind glass.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I expect lighting, store position, lots of cameras, hidden security tags, diligent security and psychology would minimize losses and maximize the chances of catching people stealing items.

    • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s organized theft rings with someone likely on the inside providing info. It’s not random people taking items because they’re broke.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m sure it’s all sorts - teams, meth heads, kids, desperates, employees whatever. These “loss prevention” units have to figure the best way to deter theft before it happens, detect theft when it happens, trespass / prosecute thieves, and minimize loss of sales all at once. It’s a difficult calculus I’m sure.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        There are organized groups, but they mainly operate through removing and slap-tagging (placing an adhesive barcode for a cheap product over an expensive one).

        Some of them get very specific. When I worked at a major outdoors chain, they’d get a $3,000+ Hummingbird sonar unit and put on a tag for a $100 Hummingbird unit, so the cashier would see the correct brand name pop up on the screen.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I ran out to Walmart to grab my kid some cough medicine. It was locked behind the cabinet and since it was later than 6pm they couldn’t unlock it and told me to come back tomorrow.

    I will never go back to Walmart for medicine…

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Exactly - you see the little lock thing on the display and you’re like, aww shit I have to go find an employee, nevermind.

    • billhead@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My Walmart has a little button to summon an employee. The last time (as in, both the most recent time and the final time) I went there at night to try getting diaper rash cream for my baby I pressed the button, and waited.

      And waited.

      Pressed the button again.

      And waited.

      Sunk cost fallacy. I’ve already waited so long, what if as soon as I walk away to find an employee somebody shows up?

      After 10 minutes I went to find an employee stocking the shelves and told them what I needed. Their answer was “yeah, we saw you buzzed but we don’t know who has the key. If we find out we’ll have them open it for you.”

      So I left .

      I hate Walmart so much.

        • Hazor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          It’s about sales losses due to keeping items behind locks at Walgreens. The person you replied to gave an anecdote of the identical problem at another retailer, in order to emphasize that this is a clear problem for both retailers and customers. It hardly seems irrelevant to the conversation?

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    18 hours ago

    No shit.

    No better way to kill brick and mortar than to make people interact more just to be able to pay you money for something.

  • houstoneulers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Honestly, the first thing i thought when hearing those measures was that it would only highlight how much more convenient online shopping is versus the store.

  • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Well yeah… if you’ve got everything locked up you need to find one of the few staff left who is under far too much pressure to deal with customers.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s the fucking worst. Say I need a toothbrush, new mascara, and cough syrup. That’s gonna be at least 10 minutes waiting for the one overworked staff member to unlock the case at each of them.

      • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        22 hours ago

        A toothbrush? In the U.K. they’re like 2 quid …we’re actually gonna end up with people using Amazon for their shop for everything. It won’t end up with your weekly shopping trip being from the same place either.

          • joel_feila@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Must not have spread here yet. Last week i bought DayQuil, cough drops, pseudoephedrine. Nothing was locked up. The pseudoephedrine was behind the pharmacy counter

          • bob_lemon@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Preventing people from stealing toothbrushes is just evil. Nobody chooses to be in a situation where they even think about stealing a freaking toothbrush.

          • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            To be fair ….i live in a small town. I don’t tend to go other places and buy tooth brushes, but at the same time only expensive items are locked up.

            • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Deodorant is the thing here

              Also for some reason laundry detergent? Like, just get purex and be done with it, like $10 for a year supply.

              • nomy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                20 hours ago

                I found a wholesaler that sells a 5gal bucket of laundry detergent for $45, lasts probably 6 months.

                • clif@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  We’re a small household with minimal laundry so 5 gallons is more like a 10 year supply for us… I’m here for it : D

              • frostysauce@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                From what I understand laundry detergent (especially Tide) is used as a black market currency because the value is relatively stable and everyone needs it eventually.

                • dandu3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I read a few years ago that was because Tide was fairly high end as far as laundry detergents go.

                  That was pre-Tide pods too, so those must be like Louis Vuitton type shit these days.