• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 months ago

          I guess it could be said that the sort of wealth disparity that we have shouldn’t exist

          • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            what if we didnt have money and cooperated (fucking impossible though because of greed)

            what if the return to monke meme wasnt a meme

              • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                2 months ago

                We’re wired to cooperate. Not compete. That compete part is a relatively recent thing. Last couple thousand years. And not everywhere.

                • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Humans are wired to cooperate mainly if it helps them compete. Basically they cooperate more than any other animal. But cooperation is a means to the end of out competing other groups. That said, there doesn’t seem to be any hard science either way, so this is just my opinion, and your opinion holds equal value.

            • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              what if we didnt have money

              It’d immediately be re-invented.

              Money is a unit of measure, a necessary go-between because barter just doesn’t work on any but the smallest scales. If I need a root canal and I don’t possess any goods or access to any services the dentist wants/needs, what am I supposed to do?

              How incredibly naive.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So we’re going to support a democratic system to tax people and service the underprivileged, right?

    We’re going to do that, right?

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Low latency cell phone coverage anywhere on the planet using LEO satellites is undeniably cool future tech.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would like this but also have those phones have a no logs policy so they cannot be used to track you or figure out where you were previously, at least without your consent.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly. I would like cybernetic arms and legs and eyes that let me scan everything. But instead we get the most boring dystopia.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    The real question is how do you define best system. I bet those billionaires think this is in fact a pretty good system. Though they are probably never satisfied, so they wouldn’t say best until they could snap thier fingers and a million people would start working to make whatever idea popped into thier head happen.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Pretty much. Though from things I have read they are more likely to be competition addicts. Gambling would be one way to compete with others. But yeah, honestly, I wouldn’t want to be them. I consider most of them mentally ill.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          They aren’t even happy. By most accounts they lead pretty miserable lives, apart from the exorbitant wealth. But it’s gotta grind some gears when you automatically assume everyone is only friendly to you because of your money.

  • Kvoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I do somewhat disagree with this. Don’t get me wrong, I’m very much on the eat the rich train. But, while not due to elons personal “brilliance” space x has cut the cost of going to space by a huge amount. And so many amazing things have come out of the space program

    • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sure, if by “Elon’s brilliance” you mean decades of Congress forcing NASA to outsource plus a whole lot of engineers none of whom are also CEO

    • Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why can’t we do both? How many billionaires are there? How many of them have their own space company? I’m no mathologist but something doesn’t add up.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The fact is, one thing has pretty much nothing to do with the other. The wealth gap between the wealthiest individuals on Earth and the rest of us is not the cause of poverty; in fact, as you go back in time long term, the wealth gap shrinks, while overall poverty goes up.

      And what you mention about Space X is one example of the ‘rising ride lifts all ships’ phenomena that makes things better for all of us overall long term.

      The fact that fulfilling three extremely-doable conditions: graduating high school, not getting married before the age of 21, and not having children before getting married, make your chances of being impoverished as an adult next to nothing, makes it even more obvious that billionaires are not the cause of poverty.

      Not to mention the fact that the vast majority of increases in net worth of billionaires is created wealth (as in, if it didn’t happen, that wealth wouldn’t belong to someone else, it just wouldn’t exist at all).

      The real issue is the eradication of poverty. It’s impossible to prevent someone from being at the top, and that top being exponentially higher than the average, in a society where wealth is so ‘create-able’ (and the fact that it is is a good thing, imo!), that position is always going to exist. But as we’ve seen over the past 50-100 years, it is very possible for that wealth gap to not only exist, and grow, and have the percentage of human beings who are impoverished shrinking, at the same time.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No, see, I made all my money by inheriting it, and because I’m rich and wealthy that means that god must love me, and therefore I must be a good person inherently. People are poor because god doesn’t love them, therefore they must be bad people. Duh. /s

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      [Moe throwing Barney out meme with label “divine right of kings” on first panel and “oligarchy” on second panel]

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    The plan is going well. Now all we gotta do is convince all those sonobabiches to get on a Tesla rocket to Mars. As soon as that shit is outta here, we cut off communication and problem solved.

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sharing twitter posts in a meme sub isn’t the best system either. Don’t expect anything to change with the current quality of discussion.

  • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fact that progressives have decided to hate the space industry, probably because Elon is a prominent figure in it, really rubs me the wrong way. It’s regressive bullshit under the guise of a moral assertion.

    Honestly I’ve noticed a lot of anti intellectualism from progressives over the past few years. You guys hate STEM, hate emerging tech, and hate people who work in emerging tech. While they stress “being informed”, all that really means is watching some 15 minute YouTube clip from a comedian pretending to be a journalist or reading an article from an obviously biased website, then adopting all the assertions as their own viewpoints.

    If anyone disagrees with that worldview, they are ridiculed for being either morally or intellectually inferior. Usually there’s some literal schoolyard level insult thrown in. I don’t like the cyber truck, but calling anyone who drives it a “cyberremoved” is the kind of shit I would expect from middle schoolers.

    It’s absolutely exhausting.

    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There’s a way to do things, and then there’s a way to do things well. It may be that many progressives are no longer interested in progressing for the sake of progression. Rather that they’re trying to create not just a more “advanced” world but a better, more beautiful one.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know it’s hard to hear, but nobody is starving in the USA.

    I know it really sucks because it would be so satisfying to say people are starving, but I’m sorry to inform you that it is not happening.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Billionaires and starving people tend to live in different countries though. What ever makes someone a billionaire in the US isn’t probably the same thing that makes someone else starve in Africa. One could even say that thanks to the wealthy westerners there’s less and less starving people in those places. There’s been a huge decrease in world wide poverty over the last few decades.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        He did say “one could say”. And I imagine an argument could be made. I would love to see either side of it with some data. It would be interesting. Like one could talk about how bill gates has poured money into Africa that might not have gone there otherwise. And then the response could outline how the money was taken out of Africa to make the billionaires, though I am not sure if Microsoft makes a lot of money in Africa our not. And I would love to have an informed rebuttal for my own use.

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ironically I came to Lemmy with the hope of meeting less people like you who act like a complete jerk towards strangers for no reason.