It doesn’t need to be your post to answer that question. The reason why they would do that is because this is blatant propoganda, no need to be on the fence about it.

Why bring up a bad thing thats true for both countries and leave one of them out?

Guangzhou, China

I made a baguette in the usa just a few days ago, the secret to a perfect midwest baguette is corn syrup for the outside texture, brominated vegetable oil to better combine with the flour and water, and habaneros for taste.

In Fact, China uses the same kind of hostile architecture:

I feel like you can make the point without felating dictatorships and making the false statement that they don’t do the same shit.

This example is also false because China also employs hostile architecture. Hell, they manufacture the stuff for the US.

Except hostile architecture exists in China, too, so it is actually propaganda…

Guangzhou, China
Anti-Homeless Spikes to keep them from finding shelter from the rain.

I have gone days without talking to other people but I don’t think I’ve ever gone a waking hour without talking.

Maybe, but I clearly remember them throwing a Parade for Donald Trump last term.

Are there benefits to websites thinking your agent is a phone? I assumed phones just came with additional restrictions such as meta tags in the stylesheet, not like stylesheets matter at all to a scraper lol

Hopefully Trump doesn’t have the power to do any of that regardless of the minor YoY increase in military budget on display here.

Maybe they wanted a version of the bill with more money and weapons to Israel?

Yes, the USA has been bombing civilian ships off the coast of Venezuela and just the other day captured an oil tanker ship. It’s actually among the reasons stated for Pete Hegseth’s upcoming Impeachment vote.

Yeah, building upon a theory of winning local elections to enact change into a democratic socialism with minimal bloodshed and without any risk of authoritarians taking control. 100x more palatable than Tankie dribble for the general public.

94 Democrats dared, but thats under the assumption that a different bill would take its place.

Democrats are an uncertainty while Republicans are a certainty to vote against this kind of reform. To me the solution is clear, remove the certainty, get so many DNC in there that expulsion becomes viable without handing the reigns over to Rs.

They have a page outlining their platform on the website, and it’s actually a really good plan, but it’s kind of hard when the DNC have had 48 seats or less for over a decade and since some of the stuff has been ruled unconstitutional by the SCOTUS, such as the Citizens United decision, they’re going to need to pass constitutional amendments which require 2/3rds majorities.

We need less Republicans, if you’ve got an actual plan to do that then great, if you don’t then step out of the way and let us elect the progressive DNC representatives.

It’s a possibility for sure but it leans on the idea of a sudden surge of 1) competence and 2) congress and scotus reeling in the presidential power