• emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      But Rich people and corporations have more money, so that means they’re paying more taxes? Right? Right? No don’t look at their returns, just trust them.

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why look something up when you already know the answer? So long as you make the average person confident enough in their own ability to discern the truth - which isn’t hard, given most people’s desire to feel smart - you can get them to accept an enormous amount of misinformation at face value.

        • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think you’re right, just a small point because you seem to be conflating misinformation and disinformation. It doesn’t matter here because your answer works for both, but they are not the same thing:

          Disinformation: the person spreading it knows it’s not true, is spread for a specific purpose

          Misinformation: the person spreading it thinks it’s true, is spread because people honestly believe it

          Disinformation becomes misinformation as it spreads if successful, as the people hearing it believe it and repeat it.

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh, good to know! I hadn’t made that distinction in my mind, but it makes perfect sense. Thanks for setting me straight!

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mainly because people in general aren’t into looking things up, and in the modern era of the Web of Lies it’s not always obvious to everyone what is factual information.

        Humans are NOT inherently rational creatures, we have to LEARN and PRACTICE how to be rational and curb our instincts in order for it to be effective. This takes discipline and self-examination.

        FEW people live a self-examined life, vanishingly few.

        Most people are rather content to go on believing what they’ve always believed and what their families raise them to believe, and are very unpleasant when what they believe is exposed as bullshit.

        • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          We’re meant to live in groups of like 50 or something, and trusting elders made sense because their survival was tied to the survival of everyone in the group.

          Now we’re in groups of millions and still believing what people of authority have to say because “why would they lead us astray? Surely their survival depends on our ability to thrive, too? Right? Guys?”

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Easy: the latter has a lobby bought and captured government, the former doesn’t. Next question

      It’s kind of the same thing, but not entirely.

  • BurnedDonut@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because students don’t pay lobbies to bribe politician. I thought this is a well known fact about the politics.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because the Republican Party is still sucking Reagan’s dick. The thought process is if we eliminate all taxes for businesses they will be so grateful they will pay workers more and reduce prices which in turn will stimulate the economy because Americans will spend more because everything is so cheap.

    Your average American is so gullible they still believe this bullshit to this day.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it all boils down to elasticity - conservatives seem unaware that it even exists. So they think that every dollar a business pays in taxes/wages will go towards higher prices, and every dollar of UBI will go towards higher rents. When leftists say “profit”, conservatives hear “revenue”.

      And when you try to educate them about it, they pivot to an argument against basic econ 101.

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because one is stimulating the economy and the other one is just more money in the pocket of the billionaires.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    The PPP program forgave more than 700 billion in loans. But the $50k I took to become a fucking teacher, well by George I better pay up.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      The PPP program tried to hand me a forgivable “loan” of $250,000 for a company that had only ever had a total of 4 employees, that I had shut down 2 years previously. I seriously considered taking the money…

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Really the problem is that everyone wonders how to pay for a stimulus to poor people, and worry about it causing inflation.

    But stimulus to rich people “pays for itself.”

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because of class warfare, plain and simple.

    According to the owner class a single mother getting food stamps is a drain on the economy whereas corporate welfare is considered 'a sound investment in our nation’s future.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Always irked me, the term “trickle down”. It implies the masses are only deserving of whatever slips through from the ceiling above…

      “Look, kids! This slow drip from the ceiling under this lake has created a small puddle. In thousands of years from now, this puddle will be much larger. Possibly a pond! Imagine that, a pond!”

      “But you said there’s a lake above us?”

      “That’s a private lake. Trespassers will be shot.”

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You’re talking about changing real people’s lives. Giving entire generations back the wealth stolen from them.

    Sorry can’t help you. We need to focus on the “economy.” Whats that you say, the economy is held up by college educated working class people? No, no, wrong economy. We need to help the “economy” cough wealthy bankers cough because they give mehavecontrol… uhh distribute? all the money.

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because forgiving debt is an act of giving (also known as ‘handing out’) money, and a tax cut is an act of not taking money you already possess.

    Duh. Giving someone $20 and not taking $20 from them are not equivalent acts.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      If it was about anything other than keeping poor people poor everyone would agree that the government taxing students on student loans is ridiculous. They own practically all of the loans. Over 90%. You can pick whatever name you want it to be called, but you cant tell me a tax break for the rich is different than a tax break for the poor, interest is tax.

    • Bgugi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ok. So it would be cool if we just reduced all taxes on student debtors to $0 until they benefit from a “not take” of all their student loans?

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      “tax cut” means they don’t have to pay for the social commons they utilize, and proudly abuse, far more than individuals.

      It means they get to tear up our roads with their semis, clog our courts with their business profit arguments, monopolize our public utility infrastructure, and have access to a publically educated, preliterate workforce they directly profit from without paying for the education the next generation to receive while expecting the fruits of it, which is why it’s still clownshoes moronic that big capital doesn’t pay for all college, as the rational developed world enforces they do.

      No large business can credible claim to have found success in the first place without any of these and more benefits of operating within society, but they want people like you to defend them while they lobby and succeed at getting all of it as a hand out for free after all the tax cheats they get installed for bribes.

      Big capital wants to suck all value and meaning from your society for themselves alone for a quick buck, yet you come off as grateful to them for it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      tax cut is an act of not taking money you already possess

      Racks up $4T in new national debt

      Paying this back would mean taking money I already possess.

      Doubles military spending

      We had to, because it was necessary to protect all of our private property!

      guts Medicaid, shutters thousands of post offices, and raises public tuition by another $5k/semester

      Well, we had to be fiscally conservative, or we’d never pay down all that debt.

      Gives away another $25B in industry bailouts

      We had to protect critical infrasture. It’s a national security concern

      Approved sale of bailed out critical industry to foreign conglomerate

      They can just do it better! Why don’t you respect the free market?

      More tax cuts to foreign stakeholders of US businesses

      Shut up! You just don’t understand how economics works!

      Finally get a small bump in the child tax credit

      This is Communism. America has fallen.

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Spot on.

        This has been 50 years of unrestrained, enthusiastically sociopathic market capitalism, and America has fallen.