• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    Sometimes I just delete it, sometimes I go ahead and post it and hope nobody responds.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        Or disagree with myself. That would be more interesting. Abusive sock puppeting.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    deletes his own comment without posting it after realizing he was wrong after defending what he now no longer believes in, for seven paragraphs

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Happens on this platform too

    I’ve written paragraphs and paragraphs about how calling someone stupid is not ad hominem. I’ve gone 20 comments into a thread trying to explain how analogies work. I’m currently in several arguments about the fact that water is, indeed, wet.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      “wet - covered or saturated with water or another liquid.”

      I gotta go with the people you’re arguing with on this one. Something has to be able to be dry to be able to be wet. Certain liquids can make other things wet, but cannot be wet themselves.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 minutes ago

        Wet can also mean consisting of liquid. You wouldn’t bat an eye if I said not to touch the wall because the paint is still wet. The inclusion of a clause about something being “able to be dry” is an arbitrary inclusion specifically meant to exclude water itself, not based on how we use the word, but based on a facile desire to force the definition to fit the way you think it should.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          I’m gonna do the thing this meme is talking about and just say you’re right.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            The inclusion of a clause about something being “able to be dry” is an arbitrary inclusion specifically meant to exclude water itself, not based on how we use the word, but based on a facile desire to force the definition to fit the way you think it should.

            Source?

            English is my native language. The phrase “water is wet” is ubiquitous for a reason. I’ll happily link to a particular dictionary, if you promise not to accuse me of cherry-picking.

            • samus12345@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 minutes ago

              I found this, but it looks like it’s referring to Old English, not modern, unless I’m misunderstanding. Do you have another source? Just curious at this point; I always considered the “water is wet” thing to just be a common misunderstanding of the actual meaning of the word.

              EDIT: It looks like it’s referring to origin, not usage, so I’ll concede your point.

    • Kentifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Good. Keep it that way. As someone who has done that (way more than I care to admit), it’s honestly not worth it 99.99999999% of the time.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Someone gave some advice on a forum or a blog or something a long time ago that really stuck with me and completely altered my outlook about social media and interacting with people via the internet in general:

    Before you hit “send”, ask yourself whether this is for your benefit, or that of those who will see it.

    I basically stopped using socials after that, because I seldom thought of anything that followed this rule, and my feed was so full of garbage from people who also didn’t, but saw fit to post it anyway. The internet has given society an ego masturbation problem.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yep. Me sometimes. Like you know the answer. It’s simple and logical. The other person is obviously wrong and defending their position badly… But then you realise it’s stupid to try and waste your time on a subject you don’t even care about, to a person who cannot be educated.

    • Kentifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But they have 3 upvotes and I’m at -2. Clearly everyone in this subreddit is wrong and I need to make them see that. (And then hate myself for it later on)

  • Soleos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Hello ADHDers! It really is a health management skill to catch yourself and pull away. The worst is when you do care about the topic and you know you’re mismanaging your time, it doesn’t actually matter, but you can’t not “finish it so at least it’s out there”

    • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yup. I do this 100%. But mostly it’s because sometimes I get so hot on the subject, it feels good to get it out there and then I worry I was too brash about it. A trick I use is to leave the comment written on my phone in the background. Maybe I’ll send it, but more often than not I clear it out when I clean up my background apps and go, “Well, that was decided for me.”

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yep.

    Flippant, mildly humorous comment, one sentence: (2,345 👍) (123💬)

    Well thought out, reliably sourced reply of one to two small paragraphs: (3👍) (0 💬)

    • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Lemmy is actually better on this. I get a lot of upvotes for well thought-out long posts and comments here as well as humorous one-liners. I’ve been pleasantly surprised that people actually take the time to read out my longer posts. On reddit it’d probably just get lost and be another 1 thumber that never got read.

      The key is also to make your story interesting. Something that pulls your reader in. Be personal and amicable. Realize you’re talking to real people and speak to those people in your writing. I’m more of a creative writing buff. I managed to eek out 98th percentile for creative writing in my SATs. I love writing. Its my favorite thing to do. I want to be an author. I fucking hate my ADHD. I’ve started a hundred books at least and either bore myself or tell myself its a stupid plot, even though I have friends and family begging for me to finish something.

      My early books were written in small notebooks. The old ones that sorta looked like they had cowprint covers with a title on them. They’d get passed around the school for weeks. I’d get them back and people would keep asking me to continue. I never did. Fuck me, I hate ADHD sometimes. But your words are alive. They can heal, hurt, cause laughter and tears, and, above all, words can influence anything. Words are power and, as long as you are careful of that power, you can write any damn length you want.

      Honestly, my fear now is AI. I like AI, but I don’t want to write a book and have people claim its AI or AI assisted. I’m regretting not writing one earlier now.

      tl;dr: Is k. Writ stuf.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ve lived through the times when online discussion was considered “just weird internet stuff, not to be taken seriously” and then people grew up and everyone used the internet and it was the frontier of communication and was “shaping all facets of society” and now we’re back at “just weird internet stuff, not to be taken seriously.”

    • vegantomato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Your engagement is valuable for current or future shareholders of the company owning the platform. It is of paramount importance that you engage as much as possible. Although not enough, we would recommend for example, sleeping 7 hours instead of 8 to make time for engagement such liking/disliking and commenting.

    • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      When I read bs here I’m always switching between this and “if no one calls this out, people might assume it’s true”.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I do this, and I have a “graveyard log” file where I paste my discarded posts and replies.

  • Dicska@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I find myself tapping Ctrl+A -> backspace faster than I can react to it myself. Life is too short for waiting for the little cursor to travel all the way back.

  • EldenLord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    About 60% of posts and comments on reddit are made by bots anyway, so except for really niche communities replying doesn‘t add anything to the conversation. I abandoned reddit a few years ago because of this, bulletin boards and small community sites are way more civilized and have no annoying astroturfing campaigns and israel/industrial complex shills.