![](/static/e3814064/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
If a real world pentester tries to hack something out of scope, they also get banned. From society. To a prison cell.
If a real world pentester tries to hack something out of scope, they also get banned. From society. To a prison cell.
The primaries have already happened and Biden soundly won them. How exactly do you see a replacement being selected?
The problem with any scoring style system is that there is no answer for when a person gives 2 finalists the same score. They want to vote, but the system did not gather enough information to know where to allocate it.
No, no they don’t. Those people jumped ship after Jan 6. The only people left backing Trump are the insane religious cultists and racists that want to turn the country into a theocracy and purge anyone not white, straight and Christian.
Tons of people. I doubt BG3 would have succeeded if it wasn’t so unabashedly horny.
There’s generally an inverse relationship between contagiousness and deadlines. By the time it mutates enough to spread between people, it’s unlikely it’ll be much worse than COVID.
Unlikely. The COVID lockdowns only decreased carbon emissions ~8%.
We most likely just need to hold on for another 4-8 years. Demographics are not in the Republican’s favor. Every year more and more conservative boomers die and they’re not being replaced.
Laws and courts do not exist as ends in and of themselves. They’re tools created to serve a greater purpose, namely to discourage and stop bad behavior. If the tool is failing at its primary purpose, it deserves criticism.
Responding to criticisms about how the courts work with “but that’s how the courts work” is missing the point.
Yes, I’m aware of the failings of the US civil court system and the fact they try to boil everything down to a dollar value instead of actually making the victim whole again.
It was a defamation suit. Of course the goal is to shut him up and make him stop defaming his victims. The judgement is just the means to do that. Prioritizing the judgement over removing the tool he used to defame the aggrieved party is asinine.
General rule of thumb is that for every 100 that vote, 10 read the comments and 1 will ever post.
Because the alternative is people getting compromised and getting their computer crypto locked, accounts stolen or their bank account drained.
The idea is that you spread the knowledge to others and occasionally do something about some of them, even if it’s only a small contribution.
Dubbing?
I just wish it had less zany YouTube BS. I’d like to send it to my mother, but there’s zero chance she would take it seriously.
Not just less useful. They have negative productivity starting out because training them takes away productive time from the more experienced staff.
What exactly makes you think they were ever great tools?
That assumes he’s going to drop out, which frankly isn’t going to happen.