• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s insane to me that they’re not charging him with treason in the documents case. There are ties to Russian intelligence as well as sale of confidential submarine plans.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s strategic. Why set the bar any higher than it needs to be to put him away for life?

        • Seraph@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Put him behind bars, THEN charge him for treason. Make him show up to court in handcuffs and an orange jumper, to match his face.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3:

          “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

          Insurrection and rebellion, not treason.

          • Veneroso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Look up what the constitutionally enumerated definition of treason is, then re-read the second to last sentence of your quote. You have to try to commit treason in the US. This is a winner winner chicken dinner situation.

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    But a disturbing amount of Lemmy is ready and willing to risk making him President because of one issue that Trump would also do nothing to fix.

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll never fucking understand it. They claim to care, but he will be substantially worse, and also make their lives directly worse on top of it.

        • Nelots@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I get it. Nobody wants to actively vote for a guy supporting genocide. But they need to grow up and realize that if they can’t make a good choice, they need to make the better choice, no matter how much it sucks that we’re at this point.

          • MisterD@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            One supports it (probably because he can’t please everyone)

            The other would gleefully assist in the genocide

            • Nelots@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I think Biden would please a lot more people if he just didn’t pick a side. Nobody I talk to, no matter where on the political spectrum they land, likes him supporting Israel.

              • MisterD@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Sadly the side was chosen before he was even VP. The U.S. has been sending money and weapons for decades.

          • retrospectology@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Supporting genocide is not a matter of “growing up”.

            Dems have reached the end of the “lesser of two evils” strategy. It turns out literal genocide is the point at which people no longer respond that rhetoric, weird huh?

          • Saurok@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you don’t want to actively vote for a guy supporting genocide, then exercise your right to not do that by picking a third party candidate that best aligns with your interests and vote for them. Disparaging the people whose votes you absolutely have to have isn’t going to persuade them to vote for the person you’re voting for. Just makes you look silly.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          There is no “worse” than full on, reigns free, genocide. Biden isn’t just doing nothing he’s supplying the genocide. The only way it could be worse is if US troops were activated to help.

          It’s a bullshit talking point to pretend Trump could do worse on this issue (especially since it is never accompanied with any specifics about how he’d be worse on this issue). Biden is full genocide support, you might not like hearing that and knowing your vote will serve as an endorsement for continued Democratic complicity in genocide, but that’s what it is and is exactly why people simply cannot support Biden without him taking action to reverse his course.

          You might be willing to excuse it, many aren’t, especially those who have literal family members being killed by US bombs right now. There are no rhetorical gymnastics that make it ok.

          • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a bullshit talking point to pretend Trump could do worse on this issue (especially since it is never accompanied with any specifics about how he’d be worse on this issue).

            Hahaha! Jesus fucking christ, what are you, twelve? Was the first illegitimate trump administration happening while you learned colors and letters? You have got to be fucking joking with this garbage. Nobody can give specifics on how he’d be worse! HAH! For fuck’s sake. If you’re not from America, ok, but otherwise - please. There have been many cogent arguments as to how he’d be worse - do you need help finding them? Are you actually, in good faith, asking? Because I doubt it. And if it’s even a question to you whether trump can manage a competent foreign relations situation, you’re either being disingenuous or comically ignorant.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s the Bernie Bros all over again. No need to bother they’re almost as cultish as maga

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Correction: trum claimed he would fix that issue. By basically eradicating Gaza, but still…

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I haven’t seen a single person say they’ll vote for Trump because of the genocide in Gaza. I’m sure they exist, I just haven’t seen it yet…

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not about those voting for him, they’re a lost cause.

        It’s the fact that if you don’t vote for Biden, based on the current options and possible outcomes available, you are saying that you’re okay with Trump beating him.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nailed it.

        I’m not continuing to participate in this failed system brah!

        Seems to be the best argument they can come up with… As if 4% voting third party would make a difference except to help elect a full on fascist

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          As if 4% voting third party would make a difference except to help elect a full on fascist

          Aye, there’s the rub

    • asret@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You guys should really think about changing your voting system.

      Our voting uses something called a Single Transferable Vote. You can rank candidates in order of preference - last place gets eliminated and any votes they got are instead transferred to each voters’ next preference. Repeat until there’s only one left.

      It cuts out most of the stupid games and you get to see people’s positions more honestly.

      In this case it’d let people vote for an anti genocide candidate and still indicate that they’d prefer Biden over Trump.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You guys should really think about changing your voting system.

        Lmao – ooooohhhh why didn’t we think of that!

        Just snap our fingers and change the system!

    • Constituents don’t have many cards they’re allowed to hold. So the ones we can, we will clutch with a death grip.

      Some of us refuse to let anyone know who we vote for until the pen meets the paper. Because the President is supposed to work for the people, so we’ll make them work for it as long as we can.

    • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was about to say “Holy shit, that’s impressive. I need a source for that” and you got one ready. Good job, OP!

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    i think beyond possibly getting paid for it, trump also wanted to pull a kissinger except with russia this time.

    also the fact he isnt already in jail gives me strong “not a real democracy” vibes from the US.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Being completely serious about the laptop, the most serious allegations against Joe Biden from all their obsessing over Hunter Biden is a claim that he had been engaging in essentially pay-for-access while in office (as VP and/or as a Senator), using family as intermediaries to facilitate it.

        Replace “family” with “hotels” and you’ve got something we’re all pretty sure Trump was also doing as president.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What did he do?

      Maga: OMG how can you not know sheeple?

      Ok, but what did he do? Did he leak classified information? Did he try to overthrow our government?

      Maga:…

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If anyone thinks that the CIA and deep state is still secretly controlling the United States, picking the leaders, influencing media to present only the narrative that they want to see presented… well, now you got your answer. They’re not. If they were, every single TV news show every single night would be running stories about this kind of thing, and good things Biden has done, and associates of Trump who need to be in prison who aren’t yet.

    The irony is that some version of that influence and control campaign actually is happening now, on behalf of other countries, on social media. Their propaganda is getting presented front and center and getting tons of traction, and the US is in the unusual position of playing catch up on the influencing-mass-opinion game.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel there’s an element in the CIA that’s totally OK with Trump being in power, because it means they get everything green-lit (or Trump simply handwaves them gaining semi-autonomy again, like the bad old days). Remember, the years where they could simply launch a completely unauthorized coup in a foreign country are still within living memory, and well within institutional memory, and I’m sure there’s enough spooks that absolutely want that sort of power back.

    • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I say the CIA never had any meaningful domestic power. They were a convenient place for J Edgar Hoover to point at when he didn’t want scrutiny on his agency and the secret nature of their work in addition to the considerable power of the FBI under Hoover kept them from defending themselves.

      • Num10ck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        George HW Bush was director of the CIA before President, but i guess that doesnt count as meaningful enough for you?

        • Lemmeenym@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          He was also Vice President to a very popular President immediately before being elected. I think that had more to do with his becoming President than his time as director of the CIA.

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Since we’re big fans of attributing causation to correlation here, he was also captain of his HS varsity baseball team, and I think that’s what really got him the presidency.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Basically if Trump wins the US will be more or less a vassal state to Russia.

    That is a possibility at least, however remote.

    If you were Putin, you’d be doing everything in your power to make sure Trump wins.