• kungfuratte@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I don’t mind 2FA and Passkeys, they’re mostly fine. But I hate, hate, hate forced logins via magic links or 2FA by email or SMS.

    • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yah the first time I saw it I was like wow so clever, but now I’m like why do you disrespect our purest form of online speech for your transactional babble

    • kossa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah. Fuck those. I just now have this case, where I cannot login to a service I pay a subscription for. Contact support, wrote explicitly “I looked into the spam folder. I even looked into the logs of my mailserver, your mailserver does not even contact mine”.

      Wait for two days, answer is (of course) “have you looked into your spam folder?”, nothing else. As soon as I manage to login, I cancel 😅 (jk, cancelled the payment already). Fuck those.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What other 2FA methods are you looking for? I have seen a couple sites that will call you, but that is really just verbal text messaging.
      The stay logged on and trust this system actions are probably controlled by a browser cookie, so won’t work if you don’t allow cookies from that site.

      • b3nsn0w@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        a magic link is not 2FA if it doesn’t also require a password. it’s 1FA, they just replaced the one factor.

        honestly i really hate websites that do that and yet don’t allow password-only 1FA. like sure, i understand that the average user’s password discipline is crap, but as a power user i’d really like it if all my accounts weren’t tied to all my other accounts sometimes.

      • MapleFantastic5738@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The stay logged on and trust this system actions are probably controlled by a browser cookie, so won’t work if you don’t allow cookies from that site.

        In my experience, they are. In my bowser, I have to explicitly allow the saving of site data if I hope to be able to keep myself logged in. For me, this is fine; I only want to stay logged in on a handful of sites anyway so the tradeoff between adding an exception for some sites vs. allowing every single site I visit to be able to save some piece of data doing god-knows-what (likely helping Facebook and the like track where it is I visit) on my machine is worth it.

      • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        even if you clear your cookies, the session token id still exists for the website

        Some websites treat the first login you ever done as a sort of root of trust, for example for account recovery they might ask if you can to verify it is you on that session

        Some websites use the number of login sessions and how many recent times you have logged in for theie hidden trust factor, and some may even lockdown your account if it gets too low automaticly

  • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The best bit is you go through all this drama and then some bloke finds a web form someone forgot to disable and gets access to everyone’s account with one click anyway.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      or social exploit the company’s IT, or a wordpress plugin, an AD vulnerability

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There are plenty of ways.

        DNS poisoning with one of those #4 private keys would be the easiest.

        Getting Grandma to add a trusted CA would be another.

        Paste bombs into browser terminals.

        Something you have is a very important part of keeping people out of your stuff.

        • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Paste bombs into browser terminals.

          Some time ago I was browsing less credible part of the internet and got a Cloudflare pop-up asking me to check the captcha tick box. So I did. Then it asked me to verify the check by pasting a command into powershell. Wonder how many people fell for that one

        • Supercrunchy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Once they are at the level where they break HTTPS, they can also ask you for the 2FA code or passkey and intercept that through their services, and you’d be hacked anyway.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Passkeys don’t work like that. They would, in fact, stop that from happening.

            That is of course if the company didn’t let you choose another method

            • Supercrunchy@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I didn’t test it (of course), but I think they do for this case.

              So we have a man in the middle attack, that proxies traffic to a website through it and just decrypts it without changing it during the login. This is similar to what cloudflare does. The browser has no way to know somebody is spying: HTTPS cerificate is ok(stolen cert), the domain matches the expected(dns poisoning), even the page is exactly the same, so it performs the passkey challenge/response. The only thing that changed is the certificate, which is not suspicious (certificates can change normally!).

              The attacker is not able to clone the passkey, but they are able though to steal your session cookies after the login. Instead of giving you the “login success page” they keep you waiting on a loading page while they navigate (with a script) with your stolen session cookies to the “add passkey” page of the site to add theirs.

              If the website asks them again for the passkey as confirmation, instead of serving the “login successful page”, they serve the new 2FA prompt to you. You are left wondering “Didn’t I just do the 2FA? What a buggy site!”. And unknowingly approve adding the attacker’s passkey.

              Game over, account fully compromised.

              We are lucky that HTTPs is very good for security, they revoke certificates very quickly if this happens, and browsers check the certificate transparency logs making it impossible to forge a new certificate, even if you got hold of a root certificate with private key “4”. This attack also needs unrealistic level of compromise: stolen and unrevoked certificate + a poisoned DNS. Completely unrealistic scenario, but it’s not passkeys that saved you, it was HTTPS.

              When they say passkeys are unphisheable they mean you can’t usually copy them and give them to an attacker, but an attacker can absolutely still add theirs to your account.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                That’s tickling a part of my recollection, but I could be crossing wires.

                I could have sworn webauthn had a component where the server also signed a challenge for proof of possession of their key.

                There’s also the component where the server can assert that the device is of a certain type, from a certain providence, in a way that’s a lot harder to fake. Anyone worth their salt would also notice that the users IP address had gone very weird, and in fact all the addresses for every customer had gone weird and identical (automatically, since no one’s checking that obviously).

                You’re still fundamentally correct, but it’s worth underscoring how massively you’d have needed to own their infrastructure for the passkeys to be compromised. :)

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I wasn’t aware they dropped WebAuthN, it was RIGHT THERE… but you’re right.

                it’s still a lot easier to get someone to 2FA over the phone and tell them their password manager is flakey, but I def concede

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Your password is 30 days old. Make a new one. It can’t be the same as any of your last 37 passwords.

  • myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I love those send me a text 2FAs and they say the code will expire in 30 seconds. And they take forever to come in.

    That’s what it feels like waiting the text and it finally comes in.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You forgot the “click to verify you are human” (followed by a dumb captcha, maybe 10) just after you click login but before logging in, which makes you, after you pass the captcha, click again to login.

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Microsoft’s is even worse.

    1. Enter username
    2. Enter password
    3. Click “stay logged in”
    4. Click “log in”
    5. Login successful!
    6. Page reloads to the username prompt
    7. Repeat steps 1-6. Sometimes (but rarely) repeat them multiple times.
    8. Now you’re actually logged in.

    How hard is it to log in the user if the username and password were correct? If Microsoft can not figure out how to do this, why do other random websites work? Do those websites have some arcane knowledge being held away from Microsoft?

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Watching the url bar when logging into MS Azure is quite the ride. It redirects one billion times.

    • ducktumn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Microsoft Login is genuinely one of the worst designed piece of software I have ever seen. It takes actual skill to login lol.

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Microsoft oauth login in a browser: type in password, get pop-up “reusing passwords is a security risk. Change password now?”.

        I sure wonder why the password to my AD account is the same as the password to my windows account. It’s almost like they’re the exact same account or something.

    • foo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Microsoft seem to have integrated XBox Live and microsoft.com (and others, like Minecraft) just enough that they all depend on each other, but not enough to know WTF is going on. Trying to get anything working seems to involve logging into everything and messing with similar but ineffective settings. And, each login to each system does the Azure URL dance.

    • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      … I was using 1password to store my passkey(s). On Thursday, it failed to login to Microsoft for work.

      “Your passkey is valid, but didn’t meet the criteria set by your administrators.”

      Screw this, I’m going back to passwords. At least I decide where/how to store this.

  • AmyAye@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Don’t forget, if you type in one of your other email addresses by mistake it says something like “sending you a magic link”.

    Then it acts like you are signing in, but you are signing up, on a new account, oops, fuckers, just tell me it’s not a valid account.

    • SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Telling the user that the account doesn’t exist is bad practice. Hackers can use it to find out who has an account on what platform and more directly target them with phishing emails

      • AmyAye@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ok, use the classic “bad username or password”.

        Or just properly rate limit so hackers can’t just slam the long in page with a zillion combos.

    • Kairos@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “No, but I’ll click yes this time because I know what you meant better than you do”

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Nah fucking email code every time! Just let me use ausernsme and password fucking god damned it. I don’t want my email involved in this process!

    • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      But if they don’t constantly verify that your using that email, the spam that they send you later would be worthless