GPU’s are a family business it would seem.

Su’s mother and Nvidia co-founder and former CEO Jensen Huang are first cousins. Su’s maternal grandfather is the eldest brother of Huang’s mother.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Su

  • Starya67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Are you sure? Wig, lipstick, mascara, same person. Have they ever been seen in the same room together?

  • knoxer (read bio)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I mean… they are the same company dividing the market, for everyone thinking “oh amd saved us from the 4c 8t” or stuff like that: you are just dumb if you actually think that wasn’t organized.

    Dividi et Imperia.

  • MalReynolds@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not problematic at all /s. Gotta wonder who’s the patriarch of the family and what did they do? Betting on weapons (likely with US backing).

  • MonkeBizNES@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    10 hours ago

    As an AMD GPU person I’ve been chuckling at the Nvidia drama from my high horse, but I guess I’m not safe either lmao

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Anyone who has any loyalty to any company I’d not safe. The only safe option is to treat companies as your rival. They will charge you as much as you let them, your job is to reciprocate that rivalry by voting against them (and for yourself) and abandoning them for their rivals as soon as they turn on you.

      • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        People liked AMD for the same reason people like Pixel phones. Not because the company is wonderful, but the hardware allowing more modification and support for open source activities. And very little options when it comes to the hardware criteria they are looking for compared to those that stick to corporate operating systems.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Team Red is not the Nvidia protest option we thought it was, especially since AMD is now a data center-first company too. I bought a 7900 XTX a few months ago because it was the only 24GB card still under $1k, but now the price has doubled.

      • steelplatedmech@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For most was it ever about protest? If on Windows where most people are NVIDIA has been the better option for a long time, but if using Linux NVIDIA turns into a headache to get working properly compared to AMD.

        So this is more like a Pixel phone situation where if someone wants custom roms like lineageOS or GrapheneOS to get away from corporate spyware its one of the top choices. Ironic because Google sucks, but other OEM phones and rom communities for it have died out. And same applies to AMD due to NVIDIA linux support being subpar and becomes a nightmare once support drops completely.

      • aceslip@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Data centre first company is what burned any goodwill I had for AMD. What a complete misstep.

        Edit - we kept them alive for the last 15 years, and this is the thanks we get.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Are you guys just now learning that corporations have a legal obligation to their shareholders and nobody else? It’s literally built into their DNA like an animal’s drive to reproduce.

          Anyone running AMD who made a different choice would be violating their fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders.

          That’s how C corps are designed.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            That isn’t what fiduciary duty means. It means they can’t purposefully run the company into the ground. But any choice that can be justified, for example as “I don’t believe this AI thing is going to be all that and we should remain focused on our consumer markets for long term growth” immediately nixes any complaint about fiduciary duty. I mean unless the board can produce evidence that that’s a lie.

            If the board disagrees with the CEO about the direction of the company they can replace the CEO, but again, the board and CEO can do anything reasonable.

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 hours ago

            They don’t have a legal obligation to their shareholders. This is a a huge lie that is told to scapegoat the CEOs that enable consulting firms to carve up competitors for even bigger money. They have an obligation only to the board members.

            This is an IMPORTANT distinction that is what fuedalized corporate America to such an extreme.

      • dou9m@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I mean it’s the same thing as the RAM industry colluding fo make prices exorbitantly high. Of course they’re all going to maximize profits at all costs, they get sued into losing their roles at the company if they don’t loot everyone for all their money at all times

  • noob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 hours ago

    First cousin once removed. Supposedly they first met as adults in an industry meeting when their careers had already launched. It does seem like a crazy coincidence though.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s insane how many people are brainwashed into believing that historic wealth distribution doesn’t have an overwhelming impact on present wealth and success.

      My parents achieved middle class from poverty but never learned how to manage money because their parents were uneducated farmers, orphans, etc. I grew up around both rich and poor kids. Most of the kids who went into “high skilled” “professional” roles had parents in those disciplines, and the wealthiest have the wealthiest grandparents. Even the “pros” that didn’t have that were far from poor. The poorer kids I knew are blue collar at best, but many fell to addiction, suicide, or fell off the face of the earth.

      For every decamillionaire who came from the middle class, there are dozens whose families were already millionaires in the 20th Century.

      • noob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yes, but it’s still a massive coincidence that cousins who never met, a decade a part in age, raised by different families in different parts of the US are both CEOs of the two largest GPU manufacturers in the world.

  • futileusername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Because rich folks get their kids high level jobs. If they are remotely competent (not even talented), they’ll get jobs like CEO in a heart beat. Who you know and who you are related to still is the biggest indicator of success.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Just so we’re clear here, while I don’t disagree with what you’re saying about rich people, Lisa Su isn’t some nepo baby that got the CEO job because of rich parents , she worked her arse off and actually took the job when AMD was failing hard. She turned the company around quite significantly.

      She’s not without flaw, AMD is clearly behind on GPU tech but when Lisa took over, people laughed at the idea of AMD CPU’s in the data centre. Now compare AMD’s fortunes to Intel’s.

  • gorlak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Family Business” except never forget that AMD bought their way in by purchasing ATI, the once beloved Canadian video chip and card manufacturer. I miss the All-in-Wonder ❤️