…US congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar said she was “disgusted” by the “racist comment”. She said it did not "reflect the GOP values""…

You sure about that Maria?

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, when your party’s candidate for president, a former president, has this group of fascists on stage with him, and doesn’t make a peep about it, it most definitely reflects GOP values.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        8 days ago

        If nine people are sitting at a table, and a Nazi sits down with them, and nobody gets up, there are now 10 Nazis at that table.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          8 days ago

          In this case, it’s more appropriately “If hundreds of Nazis organize a Nazi rally to support a Nazi candidate, everyone who chooses to attend is a Nazi. Those who choose to pee in a bottle while waiting in line are double-Nazi.”

          • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Using the transitive property of Naziism, you are correct!

            And any decent New Yorker knows you just piss right on the sidewalk. That’s what it’s there for!

              • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                That’s just what we call any water that is not the amazing New York City tap water— the champagne of municipal water.

                Edit: for those unaware, NYC tap water comes from a spring in the Adirondacks and Catskill mountains via a giant aqueduct. It’s the most delicious water in the world, right out of your faucet.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    7 days ago

    Had he made these jokes anywhere else - like on stage at a dive bar, like normal - I wouldn’t care. But he did this set at a MAGA rally. Whether or not he was “just joking” is completely irrelevant. If I teleport back to 1933, speak at a Hitler rally and make jokes about Jews liking money, it doesn’t matter what my heart contains or if I have Jewish friends or enjoy Jewish cuisine or if I don’t have an anti-Semitic bone in my body. This is a package deal, not an individual comic’s shitty set.

    Either Tony is a genuine scumbag racist MAGA cunt, or he’s just a stupid, thoughtless, imbecilic cretin who hasn’t got the willpower to turn down a stage of this magnitude regardless of the ramifications. Maybe a little of both. In either case, he’s a tedious tone-deaf dickhead.

  • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 days ago

    You know… Part of me would totally believe that nobody even vetted him before booking or even asked to review the show he was going to do the night of the rally. Especially with the knowledge that some moron on his team booked the Four Seasons years ago without realizing that it was a landscaping company.

    The rest of me knows these people are all pieces of shit and don’t care.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      They did realize they weren’t actually booking the Four Seasons.
      But they had publicly announced a rally at the Four Seasons before actually bothering to book.

      And when they were turned down by the hotel, they scrambled to find a location with the same name to hide that fact.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I always assumed they planned to be at the hotel but didn’t book in advance of announcing and got denied permission. But maybe what you’re suggesting is what happened?

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m so glad other people are on the Fuck Tony Hinchcliffe. I’ve been like that for years.

      His whole shtick has been to make shit jokes and then whine, “Why are you so sensitive you can’t even take a joke?” He’s like discount Jeselnik.

      Not exactly sure why his podcast gets so much attention. And I’m glad he’s getting national recognition for being a total shitbag.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Maybe. Frequently, pro-Trump comedians do not survive as comedy clubs/theaters are often in cities (so already left leaning) and owned by non-conservatives.

          This could be a career killer.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    Someone needs to remind her that the GOP died when MAGA took over. I think the history books will show this period as the change from GOP to MAGA…

    What a “wonderful” time to be alive… :/

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Why is it that when a more progressive comedian tells a joke that everyone says it’s funny and doesn’t hurt anyone’s feelings, but when a conservative comedian tells a joke that it’s racist or sexist or transphobic or deeply unsettling?

    Like, I get why it’s all those things, but like why is that their version of humor? Like, if someone’s a comedian and they vote for republicans (yes, there’s already a problem) and then they ask “when is a door not a door?” Are they able to say “when it’s ajar”? Will their party abandon them if they do? Or are they just incapable of providing any punchline other than “x group of people are a subhuman species and deserve to die”? Also, what compels their fans to laugh at that?

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 days ago

      You might be interested in this Some More News segment where they try to analyze whether modern conservative comedians are even telling jokes these days. They compare it to what conservative comedy used to be ~20 years ago with the likes of Jeff Foxworthy and talk about how those guys actually were making jokes with actual comedic structure (subjective level of funniness aside).

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSXKzPOcYDU

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I actually watched that one and really enjoyed it, but I still don’t get the mentality. Like, I love slapstick humor and a good pratfall gets a big laugh out of me, but I’ve never laughed at someone getting slapped or falling and hurting themselves.

        This is actual hurtful “comedy.” How do people enjoy that or think it’s okay?

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why is it that when a more progressive comedian tells a joke that everyone says it’s funny and doesn’t hurt anyone’s feelings, but when a conservative comedian tells a joke that it’s racist or sexist or transphobic or deeply unsettling?

      Nearly exclusively from my observation modern conservative comedians are “punching down”. Meaning conservative are usually in a position of power, authority, or inclusion and the conservative joke is belittling those with little to no power, authority, or inclusion. Contrast this with most progressive comedians that are “punching up” where they are calling out the powerful, putting down the authority, casting the included myopic.

      Perhaps a better way to answer your question is to re-frame it:

      “Why is it celebrated when the bullied stand up and punch their bully, but when a bully punches someone they are bullying it is deeply unsettling?”

      The answer is obviously that bullying is wrong.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Modern conservatism is all about setting up in-groups and out-groups, and their humor plays directly into that. Their humor reinforces the stereotypes they want to believe, then when they get called out in it they play the “It’s just a joke, brah!” card. But it’s not the humor that should trouble us, it’s the underlying assumptions that you need to have to see it as funny.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh shit, that feels like such a simplified and meaningful response. So it’s that in-group/out-group mentality? They aren’t laughing because a marginalized group is being threatened, they’re laughing when the marginalized group is labeled at subhuman and then described as “garbage,” “lazy,” or “unintelligent.”

        It’s like how blonde jokes used to be funny if you accepted that “the blonde” was this unbelievably foolish character. But instead of blonde, you substitute x minority or “non-heteronormative” and instead of something creative such as wishing the friends who just escaped the island were back on the island, you just give them monstrous attributes such as being rapists and criminals?

        I feel like I’m getting really really close to understanding this, I don’t see how you get from A to B in this kind of “humor” because B isn’t funny and doesn’t seem like anyone someone would want to go…

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      What makes comedy and art in general good is when it torpedoes simple reductive narratives and leaves behind chaotic, nuanced and existential truths.

      I heard someone describe the existentialist humor of their irish friends as being a joke framework where the original context and framing of the joke is utterly obliterated or trivialized by the end of the joke, and I think that is a good lens to diagnose why conservatives are largely incapable of making good comedy.

      Conservativism is the antithesis of existentialism, it attempts through any means necessary to cement specific narratives in the minds of the audience and prevent the framing of those narratives from being examined or questioned.

      Conservative art is just an even lamer version of advertisement, it is simply a narrative being presented for the audience to believe. There is no substance or free spirit to conservative humor that allows the exploration or creation of anything new. All that conservative art does in the realm of symbols and meaning is point at the correct ones and say “we will hurt you if you tell any other story than this”.

      The ONLY two things conservative humor is capable of doing by design are punching down at stereotypes for laughs and pretending like saying mean weird thoughts that randomly pop into your head from kneejerk reactions without considering whether it might hurt others or not is edgey rather than a selfish pushback to being told your views are hateful trash.

    • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Comedy has become an act of airing social grievances (maybe always has been but definitely amplified these days) and thus peoples inherently political social grievances are going to sort them into their respective camps.

      If the problems you’re facing and exposing are “the big man is keeping me down” you’re gonna find solidarity in that message and if your problems are “those people are gross and I don’t like them” only other people who have similar obsession with ordering society into groups of chosen people vs undesirables will respond to your message.

  • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    Of course he pulls the classic “it was just a joke bro”.

    That said, have dropped out of the comedy world years ago, it pisses me off to see dipshits like this get to perform for thousands while my friends who killed it at the open mics with real comedy are still struggling to get any attention. That’s showbiz I guess.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      He said people are taking it out of context but I think context is what’s important here. He said it within the context of an official political event by one of the candidates.

  • zaph@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    She said on X that it did not “reflect the GOP values”, referring to the Republican Party, and noted thousands of Puerto Ricans served in the military.

    They’re not garbage because they served?

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      From “The 14 Characteristics of Facism”;

      #4: Supremacy of the Military
      Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        As a Canadian who has been to America on and off for decades this long predates Trump. Y’all have an unhealthy obsession with the military. You always have. To paraphrase Tim Walz, “it’s fucking weird”

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    When you make a joke “that’s actually funny” about us Latinos, we laugh our ass of and love you. We like getting ribbed. But when your “jokes” are just offensive to us and not even funny (the most offensive part), it’s not really up to you to decide if your joke was offensive and people have no sense of humor, it’s up to the people you’re offending.

    It wasn’t even a joke, it was his views thinly veiled with humor.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    As Mediaite reported, Hinchcliffe, pointing to a Black man in the audience, “went with what seemed like an off-the-cuff ‘joke.’”

    “That’s cool," he said, "a Black guy with a thing on his head. What the hell is that, a lamp shade? Look at this guy! Oh, my goodness. Wow! I’m just kidding, that’s one of my buddies. We had a Halloween party last night. We had fun — we carved watermelons together. It was awesome!”

    Hyuk hyuk

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    I could be wrong, but I think the AP Style guidelines say that the word “comedian” should be in quotes when referring to a GOP “comedian”.

    Maybe I am wrong, but they should say that.