JD Vance was roundly mocked online over a trip to the supermarket where he bemoaned the steep price of eggs — and botched the photo opp.

The Republican vice presidential nominee stopped by a supermarket in Reading, Pennsylvania, with his sons over the weekend to illustrate how grocery prices have been impacted by “Kamala Harris’s policies” when he claimed a dozen eggs cost $4.

The problem? When footage of the visit emerged, Vance was quickly called out by viewers who spotted the price tag of a dozen eggs behind him was actually $2.99.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Quote: “now a dozen eggs will cost you around four dollars thanks to Kamala Harris’ inflationary policies”.
    Checks source: Average cost $4.10.

    Edit: I’ve updated this post to reflect the point of it being posted in News.

    The problem? When footage of the visit emerged, Vance was quickly called out by viewers who spotted the price tag of a dozen eggs behind him was actually $2.99.

    – Vance is being called out for saying eggs cost around $4 while standing in front of eggs that costs $3 when in fact the average cost for eggs he is standing in front of is $4.10.

    I hate that this is the bullshit we spend our time arguing over.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      good post. i hate vance and I don’t think inflation is bidens fault but i wish everyone would stop acting like clowns.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        i wish everyone would stop acting like clowns.

        Don’t hold your breath. It’s been this dumb for as long as I can remember.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Strong agree. I think most people just go for the low hanging fruit because they don’t actually care enough to be invested in policy. The vast majority of “news” is just trash to generate clicks and engagement and we all suck it up like calorie-free frappaccinos.

        I posted earlier in response to his full comment regarding the “inflation explosion act”. This is something worth reading about - that the Inflation Reduction Act has not had any immediate impact on inflation to date (up or down). Others here have accurately commented about the disease spreading across poultry farms which has most impacted the costs of eggs in particular.

        It’s also worth pointing out that bird flu is increasingly having an impact on cattle. https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/09/bird-flu-is-spreading-rapidly-in-california-infected-herds-double-over-weekend/ So, expect dairy prices to slowly and steadily increase.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well the Democrats are running a campaign on Joy and “Look how shitty and Dumb those guys are”.
        So I am not expecting good political discussion around this election.

        Everyone seeks the validation they crave, of being right before they ask any questions or have to look at reality. And that means ignoring issues to prove they are the most morally connected to their side of righteousness.

        Each side is gonna provide their snippets to their sycophants to feel superior.

    • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I just want to point out that the box he is holding… well it’s not a dozen eggs. That’s more like… 30 eggs? or something. 5 rows times 6 rows, if my eyes aren’t deceiving me. No idea how many eggs are in all those boxes behind the price tags, of course, but still. Saying a dozen when you’re holding two-dozen or more is also a lie. :p

      Edit: or is it 6 x 6 rows? That’s 3 dozen eggs he’s holding. Edit2: not sure why the downvote. I’m not making it up, you can see him holding the box.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I fail to see how that is relevant at all. He could be holding a steak or a roll of paper towels standing in front of bananas or at a car dealership and speak about the cost of a dozen eggs.

        What is relevant is his claim that “Harris’ inflationary policies” had an impact on the price of items at grocery stores. This is untrue.

        I think I get it. The internet wants to call out every detail in an image as if they’re true crime detectives. They want to be more right than everyone else. But only based on the most simple piece of content possible. If it requires reading a few paragraphs, or finding your own source material that a news outlet fails to provide, or using a middle school degree of reading / listening comprehension that’s too much work. I did that here, and hate that it needed to be done, to back up my previous comments elsewhere in this thread.

        • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I responded to a post that took a bunch of price tags and calculated an average price of $4,10 for a dozen eggs. I pointed out that we can’t even see how many eggs are in each of those boxes behind the price tags, so the conclusion that a dozen eggs cost on average $4,10 is bullshit (and I used Vance himself holding a box of 3 dozen eggs as proof, because it shows that obviously not all those boxes hold only a dozen eggs). Simple math would show that when you put any of those price tags on a box of 3 dozen eggs, the average price of a dozen eggs goes down significantly.

          And you can hold off on the weird insults. I don’t even really care. Not American, I have no horse in this race. Just wanted to point out that the average price conclusion was wrong.

          • oxjox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ok. Simple observation of the image would inform you that you’re wrong. I’m not sure how one person can say the sky is blue and the other look at the same sky and claim it’s “obviously red”.

            I wasn’t insulting you. I was speaking generally about the internet’s strange insistence to focus on pointless semantics for the sake of pride. Although, this conversation informs me that maybe there is some elementary education left to discuss among grown adults. I’m going to do us both the favor and assume you’re trolling me.

            • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              I bet the $4 ones are 18 count instead of 12 count. I always buy mine in 18s and you can’t really tell unless you look from above.

              You are being a shit, I’m not sure if it’s on purpose but you’re so shit sure of yourself you won’t even take a beat to see if you could understand where someone else is coming from. Grow the fuck up.

              • oxjox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’re tripling down on this? This is the hill you want to die on?

                Do you think a grocer would stock 18 eggs next to 12 eggs without any clear indication until you took it off the top shelf? Or do you think they’d stack it differently, on a lower shelf, so you could easy discern the difference?

                What the fuck does this have to do with the fucking point of this story? You want to argue over a fucking dollar? That’s important to you?

                • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’m not the same person I just recognized you were a jackass and decided to call you out on it, turns out you’re not even an observant jackass.

              • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I was going to point this out as well. He said “a dozen” eggs. Has anyone with eagle eyes verified that some of the more expensive tags on there are not in front of 18 or 24 pack cartons? I sure as hell can’t tell from the potato quality of the image, plus the shelves being out of the camera’s depth of field a bit.

                Anyway, regardless of all other tomfoolery either real or imagined, the average price of a dozen eggs nationwide is roughly $3.20 at present,. This is demonstrably down from its peak last year, which was $4.82.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I mean, I think that he’s got a valid broader point that egg prices haven’t been great for a couple of years.

    However…that’s not really due to anything that Biden has done, much less Harris.

    A lot of it was due to major avian flu outbreaks:

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bird-flu-outbreak-egg-prices-2024/

    April 24, 2024

    A multi-state outbreak of avian influenza, also known as bird flu, is leading to a jump in the price of eggs around the U.S. — an unhappy reminder for consumers that a range of unforeseen developments can trigger inflation.

    As of April 24, a dozen large grade A eggs cost an average of $2.99, up nearly 16% from $2.52 in January, according to federal labor data. The price increase comes as nearly 9 million chickens across Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico and Texas have been discovered to be infected with bird flu in recent weeks, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That is crimping egg supplies, leading to higher prices.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/egg-prices-rise-bird-flu-farm/

    September 9, 2024

    LONG LAKE, Minn. — Minnesota shoppers may be experiencing some sticker shock as eggs again emerges as a hot commodity.

    According to the USDA, the average wholesale price for a dozen large Grade A eggs reached $4.26 in the Midwest region. That’s up $0.09 since last week, but up roughly 20% compared to what was recorded in last summer’s consumer price index.

    “I’m not surprised by the volatility,” Loree Kinney, store director at the Orono Market explained. “There’s volatility in milk, there’s volatility in dairy products, and in meat. There’s not much you can do about the supply and demand.”

    Indeed, economists have for months pointed to a bird flu outbreak as a key reason for dwindling supplies of eggs across the U.S. coming from major producers.

    You can’t really lay that much at Harris’s feet, though.

    I do kind of wonder how practical it would be to have some company just store powdered eggs if the prices are going to be jerking around that much. Can’t do a sunny-side-up egg or anything like that, but for baking, it should be fine.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Exactly. Egg prices have gone up in large part because factory farming is unsustainable and we’re starting to see that with flu outbreaks. Who’da thunk.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes, eggs should be from small farms with 12 chickens max each, that should solve everything, quality control, diseases and the high prices on eggs.
        Same with everything else, factories make shitty products, you should rather order from a craftsman.
        /s

        PS:
        Oh yes BTW, AFAIK the flu outbreaks started in nature, not on farms.

        Edit:
        The ignoratum around here is staggering.
        I never argued that we shouldn’t improve the conditions for chickens, but to argue we can have production in mostly any kind of farming today that isn’t heavily mechanized and factory like is extremely ignorant. How else do you feed 300 million people in USA or 700 million in EU efficiently?

        I’m downvoted for speaking the truth, and seemingly most people here wants to live a fantasy denying reality.
        I personally buy organic eggs, and never from cages, but even that is factories, they just have slightly better conditions.

        I know people who have their own chickens laying eggs, but even they can have diseases, so regulation for having your own has been increased a lot here (EU) lately for that too.

        You do what you want, but to claim it’s feasible to get rid of the “factories” is wishful thinking.
        We can however improve the factories, so the chicken get better conditions. And we’ve been doing that already since the 60’s.

        • Codex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          My mother raises hens and a dozen birds can actually make so many eggs that our entire family has trouble using them all. A bird lays on average one egg a day, and pasture-raised eggs are so rich as to be almost unpalatable to eat directly.

          I don’t think every farm needs to have some strict limit like that, but more numerous, smaller, more localized farms would be better for everyone in almost every way. Better environmentally, more humane to the birds, people get fresher and higher quality eggs, and more people are employed. Also more limited damage from diseases, droughts, and so on.

          Our current system isnt just bad because “factories bad.” It’s bad because it’s heavily centralized and top-down controlled. This is much cheaper to operate and funnels money towards the owner much better, but is so much worse in every way that local farms are better.

          We’re making millions of birds suffer and getting shittier, more expensive product because of it so less than a dozen people (the real bad eggs) can stay filthy rich.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago
          • Unlike the similarly awful 2014 outbreak, you correctly point out that these outbreaks are originating in the wild. And keeping chickens in awful, inhumane conditions where they live in their own filth jam-packed among thousands of other chickens is basically the perfect vector for a pathogen.
          • Getting chickens out of factory farms is a good unto itself, but I doubt you’ve ever watched any footage or done any research to familiarize yourself with the sorts of horrors you pay for when you buy eggs from a factory farm. Let alone based on your callous attitude that you would actually care about those horrors.
          • Weird strawman that the two kinds of farms that exist are late stage capitalist hellholes where billions of chickens go every year to live a life of unfathomable torture… and your Aunt Betty’s backyard chicken coop where every chicken gets a wacky name and their own posts on Facebook documenting their antics.
        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          On the other hand, I can get free range eggs cheaper than your factory made ones in the most expensive parts of the EU, and our population is greater than that of the US, we are feeding more people, yet I can safely eat them raw without the risk of salmonella.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Free range are only marginally better than cages at best.

            Sorry, I was thinking of what in English apparently is called barn eggs, which is not really better than cages.
            Free range is the best condition for chickens. And absolutely what we should buy.
            But this production has problems, like chicken pecking each other way more than “good” cage conditions, because they are kept in larger groups. And is still a factory/industry when at a scale which is needed to fill demand.

            • smokebuddy [he/him]@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              In Canada there’s free range and free run. Free run are the indoor bullshit ones, I bought them a couple of times and the yolks are the same piss-yellow as the cheapest factory eggs. Proper free range are worth the $8 or so a dozen imo, the colour and taste is so much better which must at least mean there are some standards

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yes there’s a huge difference, free range are definitely better in every way, but also more expensive.
                They are also more healthy to eat, because they contain essential fatty acids that occur naturally in eggs, but is lost in cheap production with lower quality feed. Stress and lack of exercise are probably factors too.
                The more healthy eggs to eat also taste better.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thing is, Biden has been paying farmers for their losses and ramping up inspections to detect and stop spread.

      Egg prices would be even worse if Biden was sitting on his ass. We’d have even more of a supply and demand discrepancy.

      But, maybe Trump wants to propose injecting chickens with bleach.

    • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think they know this but it won’t help their campaign. That’s the state of US politics. Just like the gas prices. Biden was blamed for increasing gas prices while all the gas companies showed record profits because they just increased their prices.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Not to mention the price spike on eggs specifically is also way less than he would like to make it appear. Yes, in 2020 dollars, a dozen eggs was $1.50. But adjusted for inflation to today’s dollars, that 1.50 is actually about 2 dollars today (inflation being a much broader issue and highly affected by covid). So the price didn’t jump from 1.50 to 4 dollars, an increase of 167%, nor even from 1.5 to 3 dollars, an increase of 100%. It only went up from 2 dollars to just under 3 dollars (given the signs), an increase of just under 50 percent. Considering all the avian flu outbreaks that is an entirely reasonable price hike on a high demand good.

      • skibidi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I see the point you are trying to make, but inflation doesn’t quite when that way.

        Comparing the prices of the same commodities at two different points in time is literally how inflation is calculated, the increase from $1.50 to $4 is real.

        Now, what the inflation-adjusted dollars are telling you is that if eggs had only increased in price commensurate with general inflation, they would have gone from $1.50 to $2. The extra $2 increase is above what a consumer would expect given the general increase in the prices of everything else. If someone (magically) had a salary that increases with inflation, they would find eggs today to be a larger fraction of their spending if they kept the same level of consumption.

        Eggs are more expensive both in absolute and relative to other products. The reasons for this are complex, but due in no small part to people continuing to buy large quantities of eggs even when they were heinously expensive in the early days of the pandemic. The market absorbed that information and came to the conclusion that eggs were previously undervalued.

        • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          First, you missed the part where the actual price now is not 4 dollars? He lied. It was 3 dollars, per the sign right behind him.

          Second, national inflation is calculated off a broad spectrum of goods and services providing insight into the relative buying power of tthe dollar itself, so it is not missing the point to compare based on the adjusted buying power of the dollar. It is a more accurate reflection of the true rise in cost of this individual good comparing how its rise in price has outpaced the average rise in costs across the board. It reflects the extra pressures put on the egg market from the avian flu outbreaks and possible other factors rather than the general inflation of the entire economy.

          Third, if Vance’s goal was to demonstrate that inflation in general had gone up tremendously and blame Harris specifically for that (despite how ridiculous that is), using eggs as a specific measure of the effect of their policies when the price hike on eggs have significantly outpaced other goods and is clearly due to non-policy related circumstances outside anyone’s control is obviously disingenuous. And that was before he lied and tried to add another 30+ percent on top of the already inflated price.

          • skibidi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Intentionally did not talk about Vance, I was merely responding to the idea that using past prices adjusted for inflation compared to current prices isn’t that straightforward.

            Thanks for the lecture, appreciate the tone.

  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Why did Kamala Harris choose for there to be an avian flu epidemic that led to many bird deaths/culling? I can’t believe she’d write that into policy!

    The lying about the price aside, fucking morons, I swear to god.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do we know that’s actually the reason the prices doubled (and is jt still a valid reason)? Or is it mostly just unchecked gouging like almost all other groceries?

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        First one, then the other, and that’s why Kroger is getting their asses sued off by the FTC under Biden appointee Lina Khan. The avian flu issue was a legitimate supply/demand squeeze for a little while, until it wasn’t, and Kroger didn’t back down an inch, so the FTC is stepping in.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s probably both. You find an excuse to raise prices, you build in some extra margin so you only have to raise the price in one big go instead of smaller increments that better reflect market prices. Your competitors do the same, and you just tell everyone there’s nothing you can do, it’s just inflation.

          • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s been a couple studies. This NYT article summarizes some of them. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/15/business/economy/kamala-harris-inflation-price-gouging.html

            The article says that the cause is complex. Corporate profits are part of it, but also increased wages across the supply chain, and strong demand (more people eating at home instead of eating out) vs lower supply (egg shortages, for example). I saw another article suggesting that climate change was also harshly impacting the supply chain, but it didn’t list a solid source.

            • Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve never understood the “more people eating at home” argument for hight food prices. The same amount of food is being bought even if a restaurant is buying less. Like food magically doesn’t get eaten or needed more based on people eating at home or eating out. The food would just be going to the grocer instead the restaurant directly. Or am I misunderstanding this?

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                IIRC, one of the lessons from the pandemic is that restaurant and grocery store food chains are separate things. It isn’t easy to switch between them.

                Logistics is boring, but really important.

                • Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  That makes some sense but it sounds like a problem for the companies to solve logistically and not just burden on the household buyer as a bandage.

  • athairmor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    He said his three kids—7,4 and 3 years old—eat “14 eggs every single morning”. Either he’s an idiot or the toddlers are training to fight Dolph Lundgren.

    • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean … Vance is an idiot, but I have three boys. Between me, my wife, and my three kids, we each eat 2-3 eggs worth of scrambled eggs some mornings. 5x2 is 10, 5x3 is 15. That’s right in line with his claims, if he counts himself and wife, which he probably is and just being an idiot again.

      That said, I don’t have eggs EVERY DAY. FFS my cholesterol would be sky high. I do buy 10-15 dozen eggs at a time, though, because the local farmer’s market sells 15 dozen for $25-30 and eggs will keep for 6-10 weeks in the fridge that is consistently the same low, near freezing temp (perfect for the outdoor, secondary fridge).

      • subignition@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        FFS my cholesterol would be sky high.

        Cholesterol intake is not directly correlated with blood cholesterol. Eat all the eggs you want. The bigger problem is saturated and trans fat.

        Further, in the specific circumstances where eggs are the source of dietary cholesterol, an improvement in dyslipidemias is observed due to the formation of less atherogenic lipoproteins and changes in HDL associated with a more efficient reverse cholesterol transport. However, if the cholesterol sources are consumed with saturated and trans fats, as happens in the Western diet pattern, increases in plasma cholesterol may be observed.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I could totally have gone for a five-egg omelette or scrambled eggs every morning when I was a kid.

      My mother was not going to do that every morning, though.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I went to Chicago in 2016 and eggs were 99 cents a dozen. I practically lived on them while I was there.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    James “JD Vance” Bowman is either the dumbest man alive, or it’s a 7D plan to sabotage the Trump campaign

    Either is possible

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why is this dude this bad at being a politician? I feel like if you pick a random person off the street and swapped places with Vance, they would have more charisma, and also more experience with groceries and donut shops.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel like if you pick a random person off the street and swapped places with Vance, they would have more charisma, and also more experience with groceries and donut shops.

      Well, ANYONE would be better than Putin. Even most drunk alcoholic from streets.

      Wait, you were talking not about Putin?

      • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah at the time he was picked it was purely a gesture of goodwill towards Vance’s techno-capitalist sponsors (Thiel and co). I am confident trump thought they had it in the bag against sleepy Joe and his team wasn’t thinking too hard about strategy at the time.

        Now they’re scrambling but it doesn’t seem to be working. they’ll probably just try another coup after the election

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Once you break through the line of just making shit up about people with a different skin tone than your own eating household pets and s promoting this to the level of a key element of your campaign, adding a couple of bucks to the price of something even with the real price in plain view comes super easy. I bet this guy has literally peed on someone and told them it was raining.

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This story is absolutely trash. Here’s a link to the video I presume this trash article is referring to https://x.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1837581418329002260 You can see, like every grocery store I’ve ever been to, a number of different prices for eggs, including at least three for $4.99 and one for $3.99.

    EDIT: Here’s the photo op since some people prefer to comment on headlines rather than source material.
    The average price of visible price tags is $4.10. Though I still argue that the literal price tag on these eggs is far from the relevant point of his words. Arguing over the average value in the background of an image is wholly irrelevant to a politician making claims about policy.

    The take away from this video shouldn’t be hurdur the tag says $2.99 but the discussion of his claim about “Kamala Harris’ inflationary policies” and “because she cast a deciding vote on the Inflation Explosion Act”. At least, that’s what a reputably news organization would give a shit about discussing.

    This article from PBS quotes Alex Arnon, an economic and budget analyst for the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Wharton Budget Model, “We can say with pretty strong confidence that it was mostly other factors that have brought inflation down,’’ he said. “The IRA has just not been a significant factor.’’

    This bit from Wiki says “the benefits of the Act will likely not be felt before the 2024 election, but that the Act is a great long-term strategy to decouple from volatile energy markets that drive inflation and that the Act will reduce inflation over the medium to long-term.”

    The Inflation Reduction Act actually had very little to do with inflation or the price of eggs. The price of eggs has been mostly dictated by disease and the need to slaughter millions of birds.

    Moreover, I understand the (under/misinformed) complaint people have about rising egg prices as it pertains to kitchen table economics. However, from the perspective of what we’re putting into our bodies and paying people a fair wage to do honest work, we should be complaining that eggs are too cheap.

    Of all things, it continues to shock me how inexpensive eggs are. I’ve been paying $5-$7 for a dozen eggs from local producers for about ten years. They’re noticeably more delicious, it’s less impactful to the environment, the chickens are far less prone to disease, I assume the chickens are healthier and have a better diet, my dollars go towards a local economy not some billion dollar corporation on the other side of the country.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The take away from this video shouldn’t be hurdur the tag says $2.99

      This is supposed to be a man that could be president and he can’t just double check something like the price of the eggs he’s standing next to when he’s doing a photo op. Literally all he had to do was look and he didn’t have that level of attention to what was happening around him.

      So I think that should be a takeaway.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        How did you get to that part while ignoring the preceding sentence?

        Here’s a link to the video I presume this trash article is referring to https://x.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1837581418329002260 You can see, like every grocery store I’ve ever been to, a number of different prices for eggs, including at least three for $4.99 and one for $3.99.

        Every store has eggs tagged at different prices depending on what kind they are. If you look quickly and see more signs that start with $4 than $2, would you say eggs are $2.99 or “around $4”?

        I’m really amazed at the ignorance, be it willful or not, all Americans are capable of.

        I mean… all you had to do was look.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Which has nothing to do with the fact that he didn’t bother checking the prices around him in his own photo op, showing a complete lack of attention to his surroundings.

          If you want to talk about high gas prices, don’t do it standing in front of a gas station sign with significantly lower-than-average prices unless you’re going to bring that fact up.

          • oxjox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I edited my comment with an image of the source since you didn’t care to look for yourself.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Every store has eggs tagged at different prices depending on what kind they are. If you look quickly and see more signs that start with $4 than $2, would you say eggs are $2.99 or “around $4”?

              The answer to your question is $2.99.

              When you say “cars are costing three million dollars this year” and you’re standing by both a Lamborghini and a Kia, you look like a fool.

              • oxjox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Evidence has been presented to you which you are ignoring for the sake of your own narrative. You are so obsessed with your political agenda that you can not admit that your “opponent” might be right for once. The average price of the eggs he is standing in front of is $4.10. Vances’ statement about the price of eggs is 100% accurate.

                Regardless, the story is not about the price of eggs. The story is about a political candidate making remarks about policy which may or may not have impacted the price of eggs and other consumer goods. These specific remarks are a mixed bag as the price of eggs are impacted more by disease and the price of other goods were not impacted by the Inflation Reduction Act.

                I don’t understand how people are so blinded by their politics that they twist reality to turn the truth into fiction. You are disseminating “fake news” and deepening the divide between us.

                This is exactly what’s wrong with us. When one side makes a claim that the other side sees very clearly to be false then we attack each other over something (a meme) that’s whole irrelevant to our lives. We should be discussing inflation. Because clearly, not enough people have a clue about how it works. We should be discussing this candidates claim that an Act of Congress caused the price of consumer goods to increase. Is that true or is it not? What is it that this administration has actually done?

                This is what should guide us at the polls and in our political discourse, not if a quick glance at the price of eggs in one store in one part of one state is accurate to the dollar or not.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Where did he talk about averages? This is what he said:

                  Eggs, when Kamala Harris took office, were short of $1.50 a dozen. Now a dozen eggs will cost you around $4. Thanks to Kamala Harris’s inflationary policies, Pennsylvania actually has seen some of the worst grocery price increases of the entire nation, and again, it’s because she cast a deciding what vote on the inflation explosion act.

                  If he wanted to talk about averages, as the article says:

                  While some eggs do cost over $4, the average price of a dozen was $3.20 in August, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. In January 2023 the price was much higher, averaging at $4.82 per dozen.

                  So either way he was being dishonest. Sorry you don’t care for that, but he still was.

  • arefx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Eggs were like 7-8$ a dozen here, he really fucked up by only saying 4$

    Edit: you guys are fucking idiots :D

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you’re buying the premium small family farm eggs, sure. There’s also the basic bottom shelf eggs. Those eggs aren’t $7-8 a dozen anywhere. The US average is $3

      • arefx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I said were, you know back when eggs were really expensive last year when inflation was going wild, which is exactly what vance is referencing.

        They are like 2.69 here now.

        • KoboldOfArtifice@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Inflation describes the decrease of the value of your money. When a currency is affected by inflation, all prices go up as you require more of that money to equal the same worth of goods.

          If eggs shot up to a price of 8 or so bucks and then went down to 2.69, you weren’t being affected by inflation as it is unheard of for a currency to suffer such insane inflation and then immediately recover from it.

          What happened in your case would have been a large shift in supply and demand, possibly brought on by the mentioned problems in the egg production, or price gouging by whoever was selling these. Possibly also just a mix of those.

          • arefx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            snorts and pushes up thick rimmed glasses 🤓 “ummm aksshuuullllallyy”

            You know exactly which events im referencing though right? You do? Good got it, so you get my basic point.

            • KoboldOfArtifice@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I know what events you’re referencing and misrepresenting, yes.

              The correction was entirely on point because the framing of this being an example of rampant inflation and thus a major governmental failure is misinformation propagated by the Republican party.

              While it is certainly imaginable that the erratic pricing of eggs in particular could have been handled better by the Democratic government, it’s entirely false to present it as just one example of a wide reaching problem as the price increase in this case is unique to this product. Inflation has been happening and is comparatively high, putting a lot of pressure on lower income households, but it is not effectively apocalyptic as it is presented here.

              Your response is completely unwarranted as in no way was I even attacking or talking down to you.

              • arefx@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I misremembered why the prices were high, and even if you change that one thing my point still stands it doesn’t change it. You’re just being a pedant right now.

                • KoboldOfArtifice@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Your point specifically doesn’t stand. Not the one you made in your comment. You’re getting incredibly upset over being corrected when the correction was genuinely well meant and important to the discussion at hand. I’m sorry that this is something that angers you, but your hurt feelings don’t change the fact that what I’m bringing up isn’t pedantry but a correction on a misconception which is being propagated for political gain.

        • mouth_brood@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          So you’re supporting the fact that the price of eggs has gotten significantly better under the current administration.

          • arefx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Um yes? I voted for Biden/Harris fyi and will be voting for harris/walz… eggs WERE 7$ here under Biden, Vance is claiming they were only 4 while they are 3 under his VP. If he wasn’t an idiot he would have said a higher number than 4 while standing in front of 3$ eggs. How are you guys not understanding this or you morons just assume everyone from .ml is against democracy. I swear some of you are no better than the nomies on reddit, hell sometimes some of you are worse.

            Fuckin’ idiots.

  • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The conservative folks I talk to always, always, always bring up the price of eggs and the price of gas when they are talking about how bad the economy is these days.

    I’ve heard “Groceries have doubled in price.” many times. Obviously I can’t prove that’s not true for them, but then I ask what items that they buy regularly have doubled in price? The answer: “Eggs”.

    Okay, so what else, I know that eggs alone do not make up your entire grocery bill? “Everything”. That’s pretty much all I get.

    Even if they can tell me a few more things that have doubled in price, it’s basically going to be outliers or things I know for a fact they rarely/never buy. Like when it comes to the eggs, they’ll make claims like “eggs are $10 a dozen”, but when pressed about it, you find out they’re talking about the gourmet premium brand that’s always been way more expensive than the cheap ones and which they’ve never purchased in their entire lives.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Okay but groceries actually have doubled in price. Where they’re wrong is the blame. They blame Biden, who actually got the trust busting stick out. While giving a pass to GOP leaders who just keep blaming the poor while grocery chains gleefully price gouge us.