• ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      3 months ago

      Seriously.

      Stop bending over for the opposition. Democrats for the past 25 years kept compromising while Republicans got what they want and then moved the line.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Compromising for 25 years? Someone doesn’t remember Clinton, the original compromiser. Or Reagan Democrats.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        They compromise because Dems need all three of presidency, house of representatives, and Senate to pass anything. They’ve had that for, drumroll please, 4 of the last 24 years. That’s 2 years under Obama and 2 years under Biden. Or if you want to go back further, 6 of the last 44 fucking years. And you wonder why they are forced to compromise?

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    3 months ago

    Maybe Old Man Trump forgot he agreed to this specific debate with Harris? He’s weird, but give him the benefit of the doubt (until he doesn’t show up).

    • Rob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      You mean the senile senior, Dementia Don? 34 times convicted felon and racist rapist?

      • bradinutah@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well, everyone is saying it! Poor Sleepy duhnOLD can’t say the Vice President’s first name correctly despite having known about her for many many years. Even now he has trouble! Not just sad. Weird!

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Because they do a civics test and they won’t let him in.

      Edit- that was supposed to say covid test, but if the ignorance fits…

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        We would’ve dodged Donald and Ronald if presidents had to pass a civics test or dementia screening.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, if he shows up at the last minute, and complies with the pre-negotiated terms, they should let him in. If he shows up at the last minute and complains about he fact-checkers or the moderators or the lack of couches, to try to renegotiate things at the last minute, they should just tell him to pound sand.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Then he’ll say that Crooked Kamala & the Fake News Media™ (great band name, btw) wouldn’t let him in the debate because they were scared to debate him!

        His base would eat that shit up, not realizing that he’s basically trying to bring a bowling ball to a basketball game, taking his ball & going home, then complaining that no one will let him play.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right, that’s when you just ignore his tantrum and go on and have the debate without him. His base is not gonna listen to reason, no matter what. Harris’s goal should be to persuade the people who are not down the rabbit hole to show up.

        • Entropywins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not everyone’s the same but I’d appreciate people putting some laughter in the world due to my tragic avoidable death if it were me.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            While laughing with the person that killed you? Accidental or not, that’s too far, imo.

            *And this isn’t even taking into account the acting out of one presidential candidate shooting and killing another. Where are we even at that this is considered ok?

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love this but then there’s going to be a million conspiracies about how the liberal elite are trying to replace Don with a double.

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’ll probably happen no matter what. I said they should do it anyway. Ignore the fucking crazy assholes!

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Flip-flopping weirdo “Lyin’ Don” the bombastic orange makeup wearing racist rapist, lied again

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    She should just take all the crazy stupid s*** he’s been saying on the campaign trail and debate against it.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      That would be great. If Trump doesn’t come she can just take his turn for him, “What former President Trump, who was to scared to be here, has stated on the issue…”

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or just use canned video of him talking, complete with date/time/location stamp and a QR code to the full video so nobody accuses them of taking things out of context.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes. They can then string segments of different videos together for the debate so Trump stays on topic for the first time ever.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    And Fox will give Trump equal amount during the same time slot, thus completely defeating the entire purpose of a debate.

    I think there needs to he three televised debates between presidential candidates, by law. Two for VP. All on PBS, C-SPAN, Twitch, YouTube and whichever network decides to participate.

    More information, by law, or you don’t get to play.

    • ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      It doesn’t matter if he gets equal time on fox. The people that will watch that are going to anyway, and the people that won’t, won’t. He doesn’t have anything new to say and no one is wondering what his policies are. The only people that matter are the ones who are on the fence with Harris. And more serious people will watch her on almost anything other than fox. Let him go on fox and reeeeee into that sycophant echo chamber all he wants.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        That is literally my point. The reason we want debates rather than “showcases” is so that the public can see candidates debate each other. Harris fans will watch her showcase and Trump fans will watch his with not change (unless you flop like Biden). Undecided voters will likely avoid both because why would you watch an infomercial with uncontested propaganda?

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Compromise: Host the debate on Fox, but have the lady that confronted him with his own words at the National Association of Black Journalists event be the moderator.