SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoshroomssopuli.xyzimagemessage-square114linkfedilinkarrow-up1812
arrow-up1812imageshroomssopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square114linkfedilink
minus-squareSchadrach@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoI would assume they meant “of boobs”, but you present an interesting question of terminology. Unfortunately it begs the question, what exactly would we mean by “on boobs” in this context, so that we can question if “off boobs” is it’s opposite? Also, boobs. The answer to boobs is usually yes.
minus-squarechemicalprophet@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI gave it on good authority gays love boobs too.
minus-squareDerisionConsulting@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoAs a gay male; we do not.
minus-squareCoolMatt@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWell, I guess at least not if their name is Robert Lipton
minus-squareSchadrach@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhy I said usually. Most gay men and most straight women are the exceptions.
I would assume they meant “of boobs”, but you present an interesting question of terminology. Unfortunately it begs the question, what exactly would we mean by “on boobs” in this context, so that we can question if “off boobs” is it’s opposite?
Also, boobs. The answer to boobs is usually yes.
Unless you’re gay
I gave it on good authority gays love boobs too.
As a gay male; we do not.
Well, I guess at least not if their name is Robert Lipton
Why I said usually. Most gay men and most straight women are the exceptions.