Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m mostly an anarchist. But.

    I think that there needs to be some degree of authoritarian, arbitrary power. Mostly because I’ve been in anarchist groups in the past, and when everyone has input into a decision, shit gets bogged down really fast. Not everyone understands a given issue and will be able to make an informed choice, and letting opinionated-and-ignorant people make choices that affect the whole group is… Not good.

    The problem is, I don’t know how to balance these competing interests, or exactly where authoritarian power should stop. It’s easy to say, well, I should get to make choices about myself, but what about when those individual choices end up impacting other people? For instance, I eat meat, and yet I’m also aware that the cattle industry is a significant source of CO2; my choice, in that case, contributes to climate change, which affects everyone. …And once you start going down that path, it’s really easy to arrive at totalitarianism as the solution.

    I also don’t know how to handle the issue of trade and commerce, and at what point it crosses the line into capitalism.

  • ziproot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    I believe that the stance against nuclear power (specifically, nuclear fission, as opposed to radioisotope power used by spacecraft) by greens undermines the fight to stop global warming, and that many of the purported issues with nuclear power have been solved or were never really issues in the first place.

    For instance: the nuclear waste produced by old-gen reactors can be used by newer generations.

  • pet1t@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 days ago

    I am very very very left wing, BUT I can get really annoyed with a lot of those “on my side” advocating for the most idealist of all idealism, as if it’s a contest. Feels like a competition of “who’s the bestest and mostest leftist of all”. You scare people away and - not justifying it - but I get why some people get upset with “the left” because of this…

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    You can be Jewish and even support the idea of a Jewish homeland while also being fervently appalled by the actions of the state of Israel (Netanyahu, West Bank settlements, unarmed Palestinians shot/killed, houses being bulldozed, mass displacements).

  • SlothMama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Freedom of speech for absolutely everyone, especially people I disagree with and that disagree with me

  • Kacarott@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    I believe that the vast majority of people are inherently good, and that tribalism and political divisiveness are some of the biggest issues we have to face.

    Political differences arise mostly from different values, fears, education (or lack thereof), etc, but most people if you get to know them believe what they do because they believe it is genuinely good. But increasingly politics is focused on vilifying others, instead of trying to understand each other.

  • EsmereldaFritzmonster@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 days ago

    Stop out-woking one another, it’s okay to be right silently in order to bring in fence sitters.

    If someone says, “my spirit animal told me late-stage capitalism is evil” welcome them to the club with open arms, focus on how you’re alike and trust them to work out their faux pas over time spent among like-minded peers.

    Also cultural appropriation ≠ exploitation, we can stop clutching our collective pearls over these faux pas.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    Im left leaning on many social issues but pronouns was never a necessary social construct hill we needed to die on.

    I think that useless fight got us the full hard swing to the right.

    Especially because you shouldn’t give a fuck about how people perceive you. You should be whoever you are and not care about labels.

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Immigration is universally a roaring net positive in all of history ; economically, socially, everything. It’s more than disinformation when they spew talking points. It’s hate. And most people complicit are just fully ignorant. USA lost their empire due to lack of education. Every other first world nations have their success in lockstep with the level of education they give their kids. A heist of all wealth has been conducted and you are viewing the aftermath. Elon will find your coffers empty. The real treasure, turns out, was the people.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t like extreme leftists (they live in a bubble) but they’ve been right about everything and they are our best chance at resolving economic disparity

  • SuluBeddu@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    That intellectual property, both copyright or patents, doesn’t serve its theoretical purpose and just acts as a legal shield for the monopolies of big corporations, at least in our capitalistic system, and it limits the spread of information

    In theory, a musician should be protected against abuse of their music. In practice, all musicians need to be on Spotify through one of the few main publishers to make any decent money, and their music will be used for unintended purposes (intended for their contract at least) like AI training

    In theory, patents should allow a small company with an idea to sell its progressive product to many big corporations. In practice, one big corporation will either buy the small company or copy the product and have the money to legally support its case against all evidence, lobbying to change laws too. Not to mention that big corporations are the ones that can do enough research to have relevant patents, it’s much harder for universities and SMEs, not to mention big corporations can lobby to reduce public funding to R&D programs in universities and for SMEs.

    And, last but not least important, access to content, think of politically relevant movies or book, depends on your income. If you are from a poorer country, chances are you cannot enjoy as much information and content as one born in a richer country.