• ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    ITT: Ill will towards corporate America.

    Like I want someone to goto some of these CEO retreats and really drive home with them, plainly, how much we wish they all just fucking died. Don’t care how, but the average citizen actually would rejoice.

    And we have the receipts to prove it.

  • hihi24522@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow we’re getting close to cyberpunk 2077 if the police are actually adding “slander against a corporate rep” to a criminal’s rap sheet

  • P_P@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This dude is a hero.

    We need to be spreading the words “jury nullification” through out social media.

    Where’s the gofundme?

    • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      3 days ago

      SIDE NOTE: DON’T GET SCAMMED!

      Save your money, do your research. This guy will need the best lawyers and the best PR modern wage slaves can muster.

      The least we can do!

      But it starts with your dumb ass not blowing your load on the first thing to pop on some social media scam.

      Be master, he needs you to do better here.

      EDIT: there is still possibility it aint him… proceed with caution.

      Pigs needed a body at this point, anything could be happening.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          3 days ago

          just speak with candor

          he will need best counsel and best PR, the working class social media idiots can muster imho

          you have to understand what he just started and who his challenging.

          if they can Epstein him, they will. if they can make into pedo child abuser they will…

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 days ago

              Prosecutor and the system will exert a lot of pressure and the defense will be limited that’s just the justice system.

              If you check reddit comments, the bootlickers are already coming out of wood work to explain away how deserves a conviction…

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      GFM will disable the fundraiser; one of their restrictions is that the fundraiser can’t be used for “the legal defense of financial and violent crimes”. Wait until things are farther along. There may be some kind of defense fund announced. If there isn’t, then my personal suggestion would be to mail anonymous cash to his lawyers (once they’re announced), saying it’s to be used for his defense.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      What about out right innocent decision? Ya Jury nullification if a boot licker gets on the Jury. But I know I’d be advocating for an innocent verdict if I was on the jury. Hell NYC just let a man who strangled a mentally ill person to death on camera walk because self defense. Luigi killing the CEO is a form of self-defense in my opinion.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        Jury nullification isn’t some secret third option. The jurors individually can only choose guilty or not guilty. If they are unanimous, that is the decision. If they are not unanimous, it’s a hung jury effectively voiding the entire court process up to that point. The government then needs to decide if they want to re-file and try again.

        Jury nullification is when evidence is presented establishing clear guilt and the jury still renders a not guilty verdict. 5th amendment prohibits double jeopardy so they cannot be retried.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        They are both the same: a jury voting “not guilty”. There is no such thing as an “innocent” verdict.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t get this whole hype. Do we need words to explain to people they can do this? I didn’t know there was a term for it, but the concept that someone can vote not guilty for contextual reasons is a thought I’ve had over my lifetime. Not common?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Where’s the gofundme?

      Gofundme does not allow funds for criminal defense. That’s been their policy for many years.

    • Josey_Wales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is he repped yet? If not and anyone knows how to get in touch with his people please contact me. I have a line on a few free attorneys that take cases of this magnitude.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    3 days ago

    Now that I think of it, that murderer Kyle Rittenhouse got off because of all the support from right wing media… why can’t we have a party to back us up? Could a good legal defense and public support actually work in the favor of good people for once? Can we see Luigi speak at a new DNC once he’s acquitted and give a speech on behalf of a progressive candidate?

    Jesus, what a fantasy timeline I just thought of. Lol

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      This wouldn’t happen of course, but…

      Whatever the message is, it just won’t reach. The money is so disproportionate from progressive voices to conservative voices. There was a bubble chart referenced in a Walter Masterson video describing social reach for right versus left, just so lopsided, the truth can’t win anymore. You can have the mist compelling message from the most compelling person on the left, doesn’t reach.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s nothing to pardon. Presidents can only pardon federal crimes. This is a New York murder case.

          • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I know, but I was saying, even if, hypothetically he could, he wouldn’t. Because a politician willing to do such a pardon would never get elected in the first place, no matter how left you get.

            I doubt even a President Bernie Sanders would do it (again, if presidents could pardon state crimes) even if he personally is okay with the perpetrator’s actions, he still would not use a pardon for it, cuz doing so is basically asking for an elite to assasinate you.