• werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Government: Hello there Ji-Mun we have found 12 perfect bachelors for you to choose from. You must complete copulation by December. Here are their bios for your review we’ll call you in 3 hours for your final engagement letter. Don’t worry, marriage is not necessary.

    • filister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      They are practicing this in India if I am not wrong, but it is done by the parents. They are collecting CVs of prospective partners and sharing them with their kids. So it is like Tinder for parents kind of.

      I also have a Pakistani colleague and he told me that they have a dating app, but for marriages. You see the profile of the girl/boy, where they share how many kids they want to have, etc.

  • Pofski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I wish I was kidding, but what are the chances that China will become the first country to mass produce their new population via in vitro?

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That still requires a surrogate at least, no in vitro can support all the way to viability yet. There would also need to be post-birth support for the kids to be useful to soxiety. Also essentially admitting the existing men aren’t capable of having children. Expensive af too, so seems improbable.

      • Pofski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Oh I agree to all that, still. Maybe I’ve seen and read too many dystopian movies and books.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          That’s some weird af premise. Honestly, I only know that sort of thing from a brave new world. What other books/ movies is that in? And are they worth reading/ watching?

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Gonna leave this here from a reply I made to a similar thread weeks ago. China’s demographics are in very bad shape.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This was mostly created by the one child policy that ran from 1979-2016, coupled with male child preference. In China, a male child is responsible for taking care of his own parents, while females are responsible for caring for their in-laws.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In large part yes, but younger generations are also not especially motivated to have kids when they already have to deal with a soul-crushing workplace (much worse than in the west).

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Yeah, it’s bad. There are fewer worker protections and unions are illegal.

              • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                There is one mega-union (the only permitted one) with officials appointed by the CCP. It’s essentially a sham, like the non-CCP parties in Congress that are nominally a type of opposition but can never hold any real power.

                And yes, it is ironic and sad. Nordic countries are more communist than China is. China doesn’t even have truly free healthcare like Canada etc.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 hours ago

                It’s not communist, it’s just a nazi state with a different name.

                All the rest applies, the racial bits, the cruelty and genocide, all of it.

                No, I lie, the nazis didn’t execute nearly as many of their own people, nor did they restrict reproduction in the same way.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                9 hours ago

                You see, it’s not communism, but communism with Chinese ideals (therefore whatever the heck the CCP wants it to be)

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            10x worse, you work 12 hours min and you work Saturdays, plus the boss is a lot more… Personally cruel than they are here.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If it was just that, surely there’d be a rebound visible on the chart after 2016 (8-year-olds and younger)? Instead it falls off even harder

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          At this point the culture had shifted to not value large families and so few even think it is possible while not having kids seems like a valid option. It takes years to shift this even with an effort to encourage kids.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They also have a level of youth unemployment above 20%. Between a fifth and a quarter of those Zoomers are unemployed.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Makes me wonder whether they’re expecting to lose a significant number of young men for some reason over the next few years as well. Gotta start planning for replacements early.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Honestly I don’t think that is necessary to explain this. China is seeing the same issue as western countries with birth rates way below replacement, but it hardly has any of the immigration that mitigates it for (most of) Europe and North America. It’s not easy for an economy to support an ever-increasing proportion of its population being retirees

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    What’s the opposite of forced abortions? Because given the history of the CCP that could be where this is heading.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      What’s the opposite of forced abortions? Because given the history of the CCP that could be where this is heading.

      Decree 770

      “Decree 770 was a decree of the communist government of Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu, signed in 1967. It restricted abortion and contraception, and was intended to create a new and large Romanian population.”

      "To enforce the decree, society was strictly controlled. Contraceptives were removed from sale and all women were required to be monitored monthly by a gynecologist.[3]: 6  Any detected pregnancies were followed until birth. The secret police kept a close eye on hospital procedures. "

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        A consequence of Ceaușescu’s natalist policy is that large numbers of children ended up living in orphanages, because their parents could not cope with looking after them. The vast majority of children who lived in the state-run orphanages were not actually orphans, like the name implies, but simply children whose parents could not afford or did not want to look after them.

        So it often comes back to the economics of the situation. Kids used to make money, helping on the farm and stuff. Now kids cost a lot of money and paying women a substantial amount (and not the pizza party amounts) to have children is deemed economically nonviable.