The tiny plastic particles were found in all 23 human testes in a new study, and all 47 testes from pet dogs.

Microplastics have crossed so many boundaries it is hard to keep track.

The ‘red flag’ of our consumptive lifestyles, they have reached the limits of the Earth - from the Mariana Trench to the tip of Mount Everest. These tiny particles of decomposed plastic have seeped into clouds, and been found buried in archaeological remains believed to be ‘pristine’.

They have challenged our ideas of bodily inviolability too, infiltrating every organ. What might have been considered the ‘purest’ parts of human life - placentas, babies, breast milk - contain microplastics.

So it comes as little surprise that human testicles have them too, as the most comprehensive study yet on microplastics and the scrotum confirms.

Less is known about what microplastics are doing to our bodies. But in the case of testicles, the new research suggests they could be lowering sperm count.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ans let’s remember our friends at McDonnell-Douglas and Raytheon, huh? Record profits, people! Unprecedented geopolitical instability market opportunities!

      So go on, get those microplastics in yer junk! Get ‘em in there! That’s right! We got maybe six years tops before this whole planet goes tits up, let’s move! Always Be Closing!

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Personally, I buy my microplastics at my local spice market. It’s more aromatic and flavorful for a quarter of the price of McCormick’s shit. But hey, if you want shitty flavorless plastic in your dishes that’s your choice.

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Seeing the numbers of testes cited here as being an odd number makes me feel uncomfortable.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Headline: “Could it be microplastics?”

    Story: “oh definitely. 100%. I mean, c’mon. Seriously, it’s SO microplastics it’s insane.”

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    But Jordan Peterson told me Soy milk made me a girl, who am I supposed to believe! /s

    (Obviously not Jordan Peterson or manosphere bullshit)

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    petroleum derived microplastics are stored in the balls. Big Oil is sneaking into deez nutz

  • vinniep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The Guardian’s story on this has more of the important details

    The human testicles had been preserved and so their sperm count could not be measured. However, the sperm count in the dogs’ testes could be assessed and was lower in samples with higher contamination with PVC. The study demonstrates a correlation but further research is needed to prove microplastics cause sperm counts to fall.

    The testes analysed were obtained from postmortems in 2016, with the men ranging in age from 16 to 88 when they died. “The impact on the younger generation might be more concerning” now that there is more plastic than ever in the environment, Yu said.

    The study, published in the journal Toxicological Sciences, involved dissolving the tissue samples and then analysing the plastic that remained. The dogs’ testes were obtained from veterinary practices that conducted neutering operations.

    The human testicles had a plastic concentration almost three times higher than that found in the dog testes: 330 micrograms per gram of tissue compared with 123 micrograms. Polyethylene, used in plastic bags and bottles, was the most common microplastic found, followed by PVC.

    • Spedwell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      330 micrograms per gram

      That seems like… a lot. Way more than I expected or am comfortable thinking about.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just to clarify, 1 microgram is 0.001 milligrams, so 330 micrograms are 0.33 milligrams and 1 gram is made out of 1000 milligrams.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh, so the manosphere actually has moved on from blaming soy milk for everything.

      Also, kindly go fuck yourself you transphobic asshole - transgenderism is neither a disease, something that can be caused nor cured. Trans people have always and will always exist.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Being reported as sketchy information, but the basic premise of plastics being a synthetic estrogen is sound, at least as far as BPA is concerned:

      https://www.breastcancer.org/risk/risk-factors/exposure-to-chemicals-in-plastic

      "BPA is a weak synthetic estrogen found in many rigid plastic products, food and formula can linings, dental sealants, and on the shiny side of paper cashier receipts (to stabilize the ink). Its estrogen-like activity makes it a hormone disruptor, like many other chemicals in plastics. Hormone disruptors can affect how estrogen and other hormones act in the body, by blocking them or mimicking them, which throws off the body’s hormonal balance. Because estrogen can make hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer develop and grow, many women choose to limit their exposure to these chemicals that can act like estrogen.

      BPA also seems to affect brain development in the womb. In 2011, a study found that pregnant women with high levels of BPA in their urine were more likely to have daughters who showed signs of hyperactivity, anxiety, and depression. The symptoms were seen in girls as young as 3. It’s not clear why boys aren’t affected in the same way."

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s probably being reported for the transphobic idea that trans people are created by an environmental contaminant which has existed for thousands of years less than transgender people have.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Wouldn’t it be crazy if we’re all products of our environments, including our cultural environment, and if I never said all trans people, but said it “was linked to”.

          …guess what, everyone’s gender and sexuality is “linked to” hormones, that’s just normal.

          …like the sex of crocodiles is determined by the heat the egg is kept at, knowing that fact (and even altering the outcome) doesn’t make the sex of the baby crocodiles any less legitimate once they’re hatched. The environment is a factor in who we are, and saying so isn’t an attack. Just accept yourself, who ever you are.