• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So, you’re saying Jesus didn’t rise from the dead because it’s impossible. And that we know it’s impossible because nobody’s risen from the dead, which should include Jesus because you reject that he rose from the dead because it’s impossible.

    Isn’t this circular reasoning?

    • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure. Whenever discussing religion one will fall into circular reasoning, because faith itself is circular reasoning. One cannot use logic or reason to get out of a position that logic and reason did not get them into.

        • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          And forgive me for my use of “impossible” earlier, that’s not my position.

          “Highly improbable” is a way better qualifier.

          Not going to edit it because it ruins the context.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well, it is highly improbable, because only a few people have, either by this aforementioned person or himself. And it requires supernatural powers.

            • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Right, and it’s much more likely that some true stories about a great dude got exaggerated a little bit over 2000 years, and vanishingly less likely that magic is real.

              But both are absolutely possible.

              • Flax@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                The Jesus we believe in was written about 2000 years ago. Our beliefs haven’t changed.

            • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Not exactly. Some things can be proven. But regarding things that happened thousands of years ago? Yeah that’s just everyone’s best guess and personal beliefs.

              • Flax@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                We can’t prove that anne frank existed though. Those videos of her could have been an actress. The story could have been an elaborate rouse. Etc, etc

                You believe that anne frank existed because you believe that she existed, etc, etc

                • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Odd example but correct, we cannot know with absolute certainty. But her story doesn’t feature magic, so it’s much easier to believe.