• henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      At this point in my life, every person with whom I’ve played this game has died.

      It seems like that would be unlikely, but probably best not to tempt fate.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ive played this version with my nephews before. You can still be raunchy, but you’ve got to be a bit more creative with innuendo.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve only played apples to apples once and nobody was interested in being funny. They always picked the best match, not the card that was funniest.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You mean asking the game to create a lie for you because you’re so terrible at improvising is not the right way to play? Phew!

      • warbond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I played Apples to Apples once and I was the asshole trying to play the game for real, lol

      • higgsboson@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, y’all were doing it wrong. We always encourage picking creative answers. You need to be playing whatever the judge will pick, not what actually fits the best.

    • MrQuallzin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a pretty good introduction for those who don’t care for swearing and sexual jokes. Better than Apples to Apples, I’d say. Could use room for improvement, I’ve been meaning to put together a combination of the full game and expansions that my whole family can play