In my mind the rules are clear on that: to use deadly force there must be an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Potential future harms can’t even begin to be accounted for, so the standard has to be judged with those immediate circumstances in mind.
Even in that situation there are means to deter a threat or determine a person’s intent prior to employing any sort of lethal force. There’s nothing justifiable about this.
Capitulation was originally the negotiation that led to one side surrendering, hence the meaning of capitulation as surrender. But to recapitulate is to have the negotiation again, or kind of re-discuss, which is where we get the word recap.
I just went down a fun little rabbit hole for this only a few weeks ago, glad I got to regurgitate it!
I don’t know, man, I think I might just stand up and walk out on him
Huh, okay. I don’t really keep up with all of the little fandoms, so thanks for that!
Perhaps it’s a personal failing but I generally don’t care why somebody doesn’t abuse minors, I only really care that they don’t abuse minors.
To be fair, Epstein only eventually went to jail, and those convictions were under an entirely different DOJ
Didn’t most console games run at 30fps until recently, so effectively 30hz, right?
I swear, games running at 240fps on a 240hz monitor have actual motion blur, no need for post processing
Isn’t there some question about the specifics of the mechanism of lift itself? Not like “this shouldn’t be possible!” but more “it’s easier to explain than it is to understand”
Was it the head of the USDA withholding funds? I was under the impression that the administration said there were no funds, and then there was no way to release the funds, and then that it would be too complex to do so with any expediency.
Why are they appealing the ruling, do you think?
Is it? What is the more nuanced view?
Ha, forgot about that. Maybe this trailer just feels over the top
Can’t wait to hear your plan
The first one was campy but it felt way less self-aware
This is why online discourse is so hard! Beyond the anonymity, which causes its own problems, the absence of nonverbal cues and lack of immediacy in feedback leaves a lot open to interpretation, so anything can be taken in any way.
Opinions become accusations and idle musings become absolute certainty in the vacuum of supporting information that is text-only communication. I worry that the only real solution is for people to–like you–embrace the uncertainty and gracefully admit that their interpretation could be wrong. And it seems likely that the only way to collectively get to that point is to fuck it up a lot for a long time.
“Anecdata”!? I love it, where did you get it?
I’m a non-lonely male and my answer is basically the same.
Yeah, the US and Europe do DST a couple weeks apart, presumably because of latitude differences but it could also be spite, I guess.
The good old days where the people in charge could get away with anything, that’s what it comes down to.
That is genuinely surprising, but I’m terminally online so maybe it shouldn’t be. These articles get trotted out every 6 months or so when Star Citizen passes whatever milestone. Lots of people enjoy it, some people complain about it, but it’s certainly an anomaly in the gaming space.