They don’t have to be legitimate, just saying it is enough for some to comply regardless

Fight, sure, but it wouldn’t be like other recent wars.

In the calmest of times submarines have poor connectivity with the outside world, so there’s no telling what they’ve been told.

Maybe the Illuminati gave him the information!

The use of generational demonyms annoys me, too, because it’s such a broad brush that has only become broader with time. In reality baby boomers should probably only refer to people born in the US in the immediate aftermath of WWII, but practically it includes people born well into the '60s.

A 20-year span is too long for meaningful grouping; a 40-year-old in the same “generation” as a 20-year-old is crazy.

There’s no profit in it, is my cynical answer that I wouldn’t be surprised to find is actually true.

“I’ve said before that the Iranian government has engaged in systematic repression of its own people, even killing thousands of Iranians who were seeking to express the most basic forms of dissent earlier this year. It is a brutal government.”

Maybe you posted the wrong video, but he clearly didn’t say that killing security officers and burning down mosques are basic forms of dissent.

Unless there’s some Tourette syndrome going on I don’t see why anyone should have to tolerate hateful speech.

If only we had some checks and balances in place

And Congress can just retroactively make it legal

Bob, WeHadAnAwakening You’reAGirl!

Saying it out loud you’d have to reduce it, right? But my real problem with the message is how do you know when to sell the bitcoin?

I started by picking a lot of indexers, trying to cover my bases, but every search would take forever because it sifts through every match to find the best one for your criteria. In the end I pared it down to just to just a couple big ones that even I’ve heard of and it’s been fine 98% of the time.

I’ve always heard the private indexers are best, but I don’t have experience with them.

Wow, you do seem trustworthy! Same late 90s/early 2000s timeframe?

Spelling was one of the few bits of information you could get about a person without them directly telling you, so it’s interesting that even a “face” is enough in those circumstances.

They struck down his reasoning for imposing some tariffs, not his ability to impose tariffs granted by other laws or decisions.

The standards were different back then

Yeah, if I wanted to see what’s happening on reddit I would just be there instead

It’s an unfortunately common occurrence, which he is clearly responsible for regardless of his intent, but the argument seems incidental, especially in light of the fact that it was already being treated as a homicide.

The police and DA were pushing for manslaughter but the randomly selected people on the grand jury decided there wasn’t enough evidence even for that reduced charge.

Or are you suggesting they all happened to be trump supporters and conspired to protect this guy because they found out he was “one of the good ones”?

I don’t know, maybe I am stupid, but that sounds far fetched.

It seems that the only conclusions that really fit the facts are either it was a complete accident (a tragically common occurrence) or the man planned to murder his own child, which seems unthinkable.

The argument then comes down to whether a grand jury, who presumably heard exhaustive facts about the case, concluded that he should not be prosecuted based on their own biases and desires rather than the letter or intent of the law.

It feels a little far fetched to me.

Maybe use contact cleaner?

https://www.homedepot.com/p/WD-40-SPECIALIST-11-oz-Contact-Cleaner-Quick-Drying-Electric-Equipment-Cleaner-with-Smart-Straw-300554/307599950