I see all the memes about guillotines for the rich, funny in spirit, but actually building one in the town square is not practical. They take a ton of materials, they are huge, and they do not even work reliably. Would it not make more sense to build one from metal with hydraulic pistons or something? I am not a machinist, but a more mobile unit you could wheel into a square to decapitate a few effigies seems about as effective for sending a message, and easier to remove or relocate if needed.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    4 months ago

    If it’s about sending a message, then the item itself is the conveyor of the message, not an unrecognizable but more efficient substitute. The guillotine is a recognisable symbol of people rising up and seizing power from the criminal ruling class. It is a warning and a threat.

    If you plan on actually executing people, then sure - optimize all you want, or just go with a bullet to the brain.

    But as a symbol, the guillotine is powerful.

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ugh? Guillotines are very reliable actually. And it’s not that expensive, everything is wood except the large blade. Also, you can’t fake an execution, the crowd will be satisfied when they see the head

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    You can make them modular, with telescoping rails, for portability. The blade needs to be weighted, but the weight can consist of a stack of weights, like on gym equipment. In fact, you could probably repurpose a bench press machine into a guillotine with a few minor modifications.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Nobody is wanting to build a guillotine. it’s simply a symbolic reference to the French Revolution.

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Exactly. It’s like when people joke “eat the rich”. Zero desire for cannibalism, but 100% desire for the rich to be removed from the earth.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            If we’re being actually realistic I think it’s “tax the rich so that they are no longer so extremely rich, and use the resulting funds to benefit the general population.”

            There’s no need for killing.

          • bizarroland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t know. I hear the rich are full of toxins and heavy metals.

            Compost is usually used to feed vegetables, so I don’t think I would want that particular solution.

            I would say it might be better to macerate and dehydrate the rich and then use the resultant rich jerky as part of a carbon barrier for depleted uranium and other hazardous radioactive wastes.

      • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have a desire for cannibalism. I’ve heard human meat can be pretty tasty when cooked and seasoned just right.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like your approach here of making a clearly wrong statement just to get more activity on this important topic

    I will add yet another comment that guillotines are neither complicated nor require much material. you could make a sturdy one with less than a dozen 2x4s, some screws, a scrap piece of rope, and whatever junk metal you have lying around that’s around 24x8 (which you need regardless of how fancy the frame itself is)

    that said, mobile ones seem like they would also have a purpose

  • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Use a log splitter with a different blade, higher capacity valance and an accumulator for faster action. Strengthen the frame and maybe add a dampener for the end of stroke so things last longer. Reloading ca be controlled by smaller hoses.

    • bizarroland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t log splitters work incredibly slow?

      That’s not really gonna chop people’s heads off, rather it would inexorably pinch their necks until their head falls off.

      That’s pretty fucking gruesome.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If we’re going for gruesome, how about we build a huge version of one of those slicers that they feed vegetables in, and just feed the oligarchs into it.

        Gives you the option to feed them head first if you want to show mercy, while still being able to feed them in feet first for someone like Musk.

        Then they are cut up into small, easy to compost pieces.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If your execution equipment is wearing out from overuse then that raises further questions that a society should probably think about.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            well I don’t know how many uses it takes to wear out a decent guillotine, from my part it could be good if it can do 5 turns. no idea

      • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Last longer” was referring to the machine life not the execution. The accumulator is there to make it painless.