• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    All of our laptops are either Mac or Linux. Eight or ten years ago it was all Mac but now it’s mostly Linux. Ultimately, clients that have closed Windows ecosystems always provide us with laptops or a jump station to connect to. So if they are going to do that anyway, there was no need for us to Windows internally.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I bet that saves you a boatload in senseless licensing costs and lost time dealing with Microsoft’s shenanigans!

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Absolutely. Enterprise license and MSDN was expensive and a pain in the ass. Once we dropped support for Microsoft as a whole and transitioned to Google Apps (early adopters) everything became easy. OSX never broke, although the hardware could be problematic at times. The main reason most of us started transitioning to Linux from Mac was Apple’s hardware choices. That said, I have a MBP M3 Max for music and graphics and that Apple silicone is absolutely beastly.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      That sounds like a dream. I use an MBP for work because the alternative is Windows. It really just ends up being a glorified ssh terminal to get to my Linux VM. I felt bad enough at one point that I switched to kitty to make better use of the M2 capabilities.