• Binette@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not really that I interpret it in another way, but I never really thought about the structure of the word 😅

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        Go further. For example, people say ‘gypped’ without knowing it’s a pejorative reference to the word ‘removed’ which is itself a pejorative of the Romani.

        • j4k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          My favorite recently is sophist from the pejorative Platonic definition. It really puts words like sophisticated in a different etymological light and subtle contextual meaning.

        • ALQ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          I remember learning this about 20ish years ago and telling my then-sister in law about it when I explained why I wasn’t going to use it anymore. I got told I had a stick up my ass, and this was by a marginalized (gay, immigrant) woman. (Somewhat unrelated note - very grateful she’s a former relation.)

          So glad people have been learning and I’ve been hearing “gypped” less and less in recent years.

          • Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Some words have simply entered common use and become decoupled from their former meaning. Maybe your acquaintance was right.

            • ALQ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Watching my own language means my “acquaintance” was right? I don’t think I’m the one with a stick, if that’s the case.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, actually I had never thought about the structure of the word either. Thanks for the great shower thought!

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve definitely had a similar feeling with band names and brand names, etc. You’re just so used to hearing them that they are their own thing without being the component words that the name contains.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the pronunciation, specifically the blending of the end of “upside” and beginning of “down”, turns it into one of those compound words that your brain interprets as an independent word, rather than a combination of its composite parts.

      • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Unused to wonder if the radio announcers that are always reciting the station call letters found that the letters stopped sounding like individual sounds, and the whole recitation became a sort of “word” for them. Like “You’re listening to 102.9FM WBLM!” Did it stop being “double-you bee ell emm,” and turn into more of a mashup of “dubbleyabeeyelmm”?

        True, the difference is pretty subtle, especially to a listener, but I wonder strange things sometimes…

        • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          As a fellow wonderer of strange things, all I have to say is keep wondering, my friend :)

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think this is the case for a lot of words. It ceases to be a combination of words and it’s just one word. Then in the shower you break it down and ohhh.