• BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          They only “use it” to transfer the funds. Once they have it, they cash it in. No criminal is keeping it in crypto form. They use it the same way they use Apple gift cards.

            • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              5 months ago

              An easy way to tell if it’s “real” money or not is to see if goods are ever priced directly in it, where it isn’t just directly indexed to the exchange rate of an established currency.

              Hint: Even places that accept crypto payments don’t do this. The crypto price fluctuates based on the moment by moment exchange rate to the local currency.

              • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                sumerians denoted everything in silver shekels but trade was done will all manner of commodities, including barley grains. your theory of money sounds like it comes from the Adam Smith cult.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Are barley grains a currency? I’m not understanding your argument here. In a practical sense, cryptocurrencies are far too volatile to use as a currency and the “stable” coins are tied to things like the US dollar. Well, I should say allegedly tied because “stable” coins like tether haven’t been audited to actually prove it’s tied to the underlying.

              • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                tally sticks denoted debt in Britain, and were used directly as money out of convenience, but they were themselves denoted in roman currency iirc.

                • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Can I ask what the point of arguing semantics here is?

                  Maybe you have put in the effort to figure out all the avenues to use bitcoin to pay for things, but its not easy and you sound more like a drug addict scrounging for metal and bottles, and then wondering why noone else is interested in your hustle.

                  Why do you care if people call bitcoin real or not anyways? For most people its not real, for you I guess it is, does that make sense?

                  • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    if someone is making a semantic argument it’s those who won’t accept that Bitcoin is money as surely as any other form of money we have ever used.

        • s_s@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you’re “invested” in cryptogoboligook and you’re not ripping someone off–guess what?–you’re the mark.

          Regardless, you can generally use money to buy things.

          You can’t buy anything with crypto because it’s 15 years later, and “mass adoption” is never happening. It’s “fake money”.

            • Pratai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The only ones that treat it as money are in on it. Otherwise, you could go to a Best Buy and get a TV with your crypto-card.

                • Pratai@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  No, because it’s not legal currency. Are you getting it now?? Valuables aren’t all accepted currency….

                  Your argument is DEEPLY flawed.

                • Pratai@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  And what does that tell you? That maybe those things aren’t legal currency??

                  • uis@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Then US Dollar isn’t legal currency everywhere outside of USSA. You can’t just go to shop and buy groceries with it.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I hate to be “that guy” but your definition of money is a little constrained. By that definition, the only “money” is the money of the country you’re currently in. Can you walk into a bestbuy and purchase a TV with Yuan?

                You’re likely trying to say “Can you walk into a normal store of an appropriate country and pay with that currency” but even that is flawed, as certain stores don’t accept credit/debit, or don’t accept cash.

                  • uis@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Dollar isn’t legal tender either. Everyone wants something called “рубль”.

            • s_s@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              People certainly don’t treat crypto like money.

              And I suppose that’s where our conversation has to stop because you’ve now outed yourself as willing to say any outlandish thing to support crypto.

              Because I do not believe you can actually think that.

            • oatscoop@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Crypto is an un-backed and unregulated security – the value of which fluctuates wildly. Turns out most people don’t like being paid in something that can drastically lose value in the span of hours.

              The few people and institutions that accept crypto as payment either immediately convert it back into real money or are “investors” treating it like the security it actually is.

                • oatscoop@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  “unbacked”

                  I’m assuming those quotes are referring to fiat currency. Faith in the solvency of the issuing government, widely agreed upon exchange rates, and regulated prices of goods are all forms of backing. Sure: you can argue that’s “not enough” but crypto “currencies” don’t even have that. Hence why their values fluctuate by the minute – which defeats the entire purpose of “money”.

                  unregulated

                  … government controlled central banks and entire bodies of law exist to do just that. Nobody is regulating crypto.

                  Crypto lacks the features that make money “money”. It doesn’t have a relatively stable, agreed upon value. It’s not easily exchanged for goods or services. It technically can be used as “money” but that’s true of anything – trading cards, a pile of gravel, etc.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          With real money you can take out a loan. Kinda the whole point of money, it represents value that is owed.

          While crypto loans would be technically possible it would be a foolish thing to do since it’s effectively a short on something that could increase in value. Real money has a small but steady (well, ideally) inflation so you can be confident in taking out a loan and not having to worry about the currency doing something crazy like doubling in value resulting in you owing double the value than you initially borrowed. This is not the case for crypto so it’s simply not a viable currency for financing anything.

          Since it’s not viable for financing, it’s not a real currency and never will be. Like is someone supposed to take out a business loan in real currency, convert it to crypto, pay someone else who would then have to convert it back to real money so they can pay back their loan? Why would people want to do all of these conversions back and forth to and from crypto? Because they like the risk of the value dropping for the brief time they’re holding onto it?

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Regardless of your personal opinions about cryptocurrency, that is absolutely what this post is referring to by saying fake money for criminal.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can only imagine he means American currency, and the anti-counterfeiting technology embedded in it. It’s the most popular currency in the world.

      Oh, bitcoin? The accounting package that requires the power of a small nation to maintain it? Well, I guess that works, too.

      • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        the bitcoin blockchain doesn’t require all that power. nothing about the code dictates that. it’s a social phenomenon, just like the markets.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          Okay, “maintain” isn’t the right word, but the mining process is designed that way and it’s baked into the whole currency. Actual work could have been done, but instead we burned it all for imaginary money (which isn’t much different from fiat currency).

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The bitcoin blockchain requires more power than any other blockchain while providing less features.

          The only outstanding feature of bitcoin is it’s price.

          • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            the bitcoin blockchain doesn’t require any power. any miner can stop, the blockchain would have less power, and still continue to function.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The bitcoin blockchain doesn’t require any power.

              Yes. It does. No transaction can occur without proof of work being performed.

              any miner can stop, the blockchain would have less power, and still continue to function.

              Marginally less power, but nowhere near the reduction needed to compete with a PoS blockchain.

              For example Ethereum PoS uses 2,600 MWh per year (= a single 1MW windfarm). Bitcoin uses 53,000x more energy than Ethereum.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  the whole network could be run on two raspberry pis.

                  No. Then someone would buy 3 raspberry pis and claim all the bitcoin.

                  Bitcoin was a great idea in 2008 but in 2024 it has been overshadowed by other blockchains in every single dimension except for market cap.