• DoctorNope@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Trump appointee Aileen Cannon indefinitely postpones Trump classified documents trial, but I hardly see why that’s relevant.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      And a particularly unqualified and ideological appointment, even by Trump standards.

      • Delusional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Idk trump standards are “do the opposite of what is good and right” so this seems right up the trump standards alley.

  • null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Make sure you don’t vote for Biden though, because of that one issue you suddenly care about.

    Inb4 the standard myopic replies from .ml accounts

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      that one issue you suddenly care about.

      That will also be significantly worse under Trump.

  • rusticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Fire her. She’s compromised and a Trump appointee that should have been recused.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      How?

      Wouldn’t she need to be to be impeached by the House? The house is controlled by the GOP. Even if a few republicans wanted to remove her, you would still need the GOP speaker to bring this to the floor.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That’s not true.

          It still requires a simple majority to remove a speaker. In the case of Kevin McCarthy, the vote was 216 to 210, in favor of removal.

          What is new is that the GOP is allowing anyone to bring a motion to vacate to the floor. You still need a majority vote to oust someone, but any yahoo can now force the house to drop everything and vote on removing the speaker.

          That causes chaos and previously it required a higher bar to get a motion to vacate rolling.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The prosecutor can request that she be removed from the case, but that’s extreme and, if fails, leaves him with a hostile judge that is also even more empowered than before.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fully irresponsible to not have “trump-appointed…” leading that headline for all the out of touch people seeing this for the first time.

    Just federal judge, huh? No other relevant context to mention?

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want to THANK Aileen Canon for making it LEGAL to STEAL TOP SECRET UNITED STATES DEFENSE DOCUMENTS!

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    After decades of Americans saving the world in movies I can now confidently say that they instead will just sit at home continuing their consumption until someone comes and shoots them like a dog. We jUsT NeeD tO VoTe HArdEr

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        jUsT vOtE

        For what? No change? The status quo? I’d rather vote for America’s downfall so that the pain and terror Americans inflict overseas, is felt here in our borders.

        Americans love violence so much, why should you have peace in your streets?

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          What a psycho. Were you asleep in the WWII section or do that cover that in a later grade at your school? A fascist dictatorship will be invading foreign nations harder than it ever has. All while removing the rights and lives of minority groups domestically.

    • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re assuming Trump will win the election. He won’t.

      Jesus, why do people forget that Trump lost an election while being president and while trying to tamper with it? What makes you think he will win this time?

    • eldavi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      So, no laws for the rich

      the only surprising thing about this is that not everyone already knew this.

      it’s not snark or sarcasm: this is true more often than not and i guess people really don’t like paying attention.

        • eldavi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          their protest used to start revolutions and now their protests are safely ignored until they run out of steam; the people in charge have gotten really good forcing everyone else to choose between a future and right now

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Listen, I’ve seen this in every thread. The judges are just being extra careful so they can make sure the case doesn’t get thrown out because it’s a highly sensitive subject.

      Four years just wasn’t enough time. You have to be patient about these things. Give us another Friedman Unit or two to settle things out.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re trying to conflate a right-wing judge’s bias with those biG bAd LibErAlS who defend Garland’s meticulous albeit slow investigation and hand-off to Jack Smith I guess.

  • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s ridiculous, just let the FBI edit the evidence however they want so long as they get their convictions.