Anti-NATO protesters gathered again in Montreal on Saturday to demand Canada withdraw from the alliance, a day after a demonstration organized by different groups resulted in arrests, burned cars and shattered windows.

the purpose of the protest was to demonstrate against what he called NATO’s “complicity with Israel’s military while it’s conducting its genocide in Gaza, … war crimes in Lebanon, Syria” and that “it’s enforcing illegal occupation of Palestinian territories.”

However, Allard rejected accusations of antisemitism. He said the protests were against the actions of the state of Israel and not Jewish people, adding that earlier this week the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Expert level challenge: hit a bong every time someone blames the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on some party who isn’t even fucking involved…

    God forbid we ever acknowledge the basic truth that the two most culpable parties responsible for the ~80 years of war are, unsurprisingly to many, Israel and Palestine for empowering the worst possible political leaders on both sides. Netanyahu and Hams got the violence and anger that they always wanted and have been working towards for most of our lives, and somehow that’s NATO’s fault in the peabrain’s shallow mind.

    NATO is the main thing keeping the western world and democratic ideology safe from countries like Russia, Iran and China. Is this another thing we’re gonna throw under the bus for no reason other than some vague, nonsensical whining about Gaza?

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Nah. The US has blood all over it’s hands Re Gaza. Agreed that blaming NATO is nonsense

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Disappointed that this happened at all, but the fact that it was only 80 people is a plus. Seems like it’s just a small group of terminally online agitators.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Glad to see all the genocide sympathizers are out here in force, playing apologist for Russia.

  • ShadowRam@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    217
    ·
    2 days ago

    WTF does NATO have anything to do with Israel or Palestine?!

    WTF would leaving NATO have any effect on Israel or Palestine?!

    WTF are these people even on about?

    NATO’s “complicity with Israel’s military while it’s conducting its genocide in Gaza

    NATO isn’t helping Israel… (while some NATO members might be, that’s not NATO)

    It’s not NATO’s job to get involved with with Israel or Palestine…

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    Looks like Russia is bout wasting time and once again uses their distinguishers network.

    Remember trucker blockages of supply routes they did right before the full invasion?

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Organizers and people arrested should be put on a plane and given a tour through Ukraines east… to see with their own eyes. Too many people seem to be unaware why a counterforce to Russia was created in the first place.

      Arguing against NATO for the reasons they state just means more people will suffer like the Palestinians do.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Haha, no… the USSR made themselves go bankrupt and caused the country to devolve until it was no longer viable all the while genociding their own population. You’ve got some revisionist history on your shirt.

      • solo@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Arguing against NATO for the reasons they state just means more people will suffer like the Palestinians do.

        I don’t know why you say this. NATO has been supporting Israel, not Palestine

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That was not my point. NATO is a stabilizing force. If you remove it, Russia and others will just go on the war path and more people will suffer…

          I acknowledge the suffering of the Palestinians and think that needs to stop. In the past I argued that the war crime angle against Netanyahu should be picked up by the icc… and now they ruled there is enough evidence to issue an arrest warrant.

          But NATO does not support these atrocities. Countries in NATO do… but how does the NATO organisation do that?

          This seems to be of the same mold as “the UN does not do anything but talk” yeah… the UN is a talking organisation… that’s their goal… keep people in dialogue and serve as a platform to hopefully have member countries do stuff.

          NATO is a defense alliance… member countries not actively doing something against Israëls agression does not mean that it would be up to NATO to do something.

          • solo@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I’ll try to put things into some historical perspective, as briefly as I can.

            NATO was supposed to be a stabilizing force against the Soviet Bloc. During the cold war that was the rational.

            Some claim that it was a tool to confirm and maintain US military hegemony and I tend to agree with this take. After approx 1993, through its interventions this started to be more and more obvious, especially to those living in the global South.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                NATO didn’t go to war with Iraq, the coalition of the willing did. NATO got involved later on with a mission to train the Iraqi army but that’s a footnote, also, not actual combat.

                Afghanistan was a NATO war, triggered by the US invoking Article 5. NATO also intervened in Yugoslavia. Everyone was pretty much genociding everyone there, massacres left and right, but the Serbs had a disproportionate amount of military resources and were able to do systematic genocide which prompted the intervention. And please for your own sanity ignore anything Chomsky has to say about the thing he’s still calling concentration camps refugee shelters. “CIA says something so the opposite must be true” brainworms.

              • antiykns@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Why “outside the Iraq war” you dishonest fuck? That alone is a pretty good example of how shitty the NATO is. The US have undue power in NATO vassal states due to them empowering fascists and killing left-wing politicians. I even had some of yee jingoist fucks try to defend Gladio lmao. Litteral terrorists.

                It’s not a benevolent alliance between partners, it’s a vassal-overlord relationship, a protection racket and a subsidy to their weapon industry. Do not forget who empowered the russian fascists or the talibans in the first place.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  It’s not a benevolent alliance between partners, it’s a vassal-overlord relationship,

                  Why do I only hear that kind of thing from Americans with their penchant for exceptionalism, or vatniks.

                  You could see just how much control the US has over NATO by the amount of states telling them to pound sand when it came to Vietnam, when it came to Iraq.

                • futatorius@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Do not forget who empowered the russian fascists or the talibans in the first place.

                  Reagan, and the Pakistani ISI, respectively.

                • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Well that’s a constructive answer, and not even a good one. Maybe spend a little less time in your echo chambers and look at all factors of conflicts instead of US bad… rest is irrelevant.

            • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Yes, those are US bootlickers stating their verbal support, but NATO cannot participate in Palestine because to deploy NATO forces article 5 must be invoked by a member country and it must be in response to an attack on said member country. That is the core principle of the treaty. It’s a self defense treaty, of which Israel is not a part of.

              If any country participates in the genocide of the Palestinian people, they do so of their own volition and not at the behest of NATO. Canada leaving NATO or NATO being dissolved would have no bearing whatsoever on the Israeli genocide. The shared NATO membership may foster relationships and cooperation on extra treaty operations, but these are not NATO operations. To be a NATO operation, it has to be an article 5 operation or some operation mandated by the UN, and while the latter has happened, it was highly controversial that it did, as it was beyond the scope of the NATO treaty.

              This protest demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what NATO is or how it works and ultimately even if they got what they wanted, which they won’t, it wouldn’t have accomplished what they were aiming for. The fundamental difference between a NATO operation and an operation of NATO member countries not consecrated in the treaty, is that the former is required to remain in NATO and the latter is completely voluntary.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Alliance members get to decide who’s in their alliance. Nobody’s preventing you from expressing your opinion, but it’s pointless.

      • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because Canada has no reason to be concerned about Russian aggression? Isn’t literally right next door to them? Doesn’t regularly intercept russian incursions into Canadian airspace? Has nothing to be concerned about regarding the NW passage and Arctic expansion?

        Straight up Russian propaganda you’re selling here.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, I’m sure Canada not being allied with a bunch of other naval powers would be a lot better for the residents of Монреаль in the long run.

  • MisterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Send them to fight in Ukraine. Let them pick a side too.

    When they ask why, tell them this is what would happen if there was no NATO. They would be drafted into the war. Just like in WW2.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, I think we all know which side they would fight if given the choice. They would twerk for ‘Daddy Vladi’.

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The problem would sort itself out pretty quickly then. Tankies are what you would refer to as полезные дураки, or useful idiots. If Putin doesn’t care about sending full blooded Russians to die in meat grinder assaults against fortified positions, then he sure as hell wouldn’t give a shit about a bunch of western groupies who want to cosplay the USSR. Most of the idiots on Lemmy.ml and Hexbear wouldn’t last more than a week, I would wager.

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can be against Putin AND against NATO. I would agree that maybe now is not the best time for this demonstration, but NATO is still a bad organization.

      • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s a military and imperialist organization lol. I’ll give you a detailled reply but will also return the question: what good had NATO done exaclty?

        From my Canadian perspective, NATO pressures Canada to increase military spending to 2% of GDP. Meanwhile we are in the middle of the biggest housing crisis of the past 50 years, but our (most probably) next prime minister will inject billions in the army.

        NATO has supported Israel intervention on multiple occasion. Although they have timidly requested a ceasefire, they continue the official discourse on “the right to defend oneself”.

        NATO has embarked on numerous interventions over the past 30 years, notably the "war against terrorism” and wars in Iraq, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria… All with great results /s

        NATO isn’t doing shit for Ukraine.

        Your turn!

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          2 days ago

          No war since WW2 for 80 years. The full invasion of Ukraine happened, because putin was convinced NATO was too weak.

          • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            No war in western europe*

            And that is mostly due to mutually assured destruction and decolonization and the destruction of European imperial ambitions. If these grand entangling alliances prevented war then WWI wouldn’t have happened. If nukes weren’t a thing then nato would probably be a factor contributing towards another world war rather then preventing it.

            • takeda@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 day ago

              No war in countries that joined NATO. #2 goal of NATO is to be prepared to fight enemy together when attacked. #1 goal of NATO is to discourage war, because it’s you attack one NATO country, you start war with 32 countries.

          • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            No war since 80 years?!? Did I miss something or do you just choose to exclude Irak, Afghanistan, Syria, Bosnia? I guess that wars that do not directly affect the comfort of Westerners are not ‘real’ wars.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NATO_operations

            NATO and the USA basically destroyed Afghanistan and left all of the women of in the hands of barbarians, but fuck them I guess. 20 years of interventions and the situation is worse for everyone except Talibans, thanks NATO!

            And again, NATO isn’t doing shit in Ukraine.

            • futatorius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              You left off the “in Europe” part.

              NATO and the USA basically destroyed Afghanistan and left all of the women of in the hands of barbarians

              NATO assisted with the initial invasion. The war aims and rules of engagement were poorly thought out, as one would expect of G W Bush. The two choices that made sense were to kill off Al-Qaida and leave, or stay a bit longer and kill every single member of the Taliban, in both Afghanistan and in Pakistan (where they were formed by the Pakistani ISI, and from whom they continue to receive shelter and material support). The US did neither, NATO members faded away after the initial engagement, and the US attempted to stabilize the situation without addressing the root problem. If anyone had asked me, the first option would have been my choice: kill as many jihadis as possible, take out AQ leadership if we can, then go home.

              And it was Donald Trump who surrendered the Afghan people, including the women, into the hands of the Taliban, releasing all the Taliban prisoners and getting nothing in return.

              But I don’t believe that you’re really all that torn up about the fate of Afghan women. It just feeds your anti-NATO narrative.

              And again, NATO isn’t doing shit in Ukraine.

              Why would they be? Ukraine is not a NATO country, so the mutual-defense treaty has not been triggered. I suspect you’d be complaining even more if, in response to Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, NATO waded in and we now found ourselves in a war the likes of which hasn’t been seen since WW2: possibly worse.

              On the other hand, several NATO member countries are supplying and supporting Ukraine.

              • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                You left off the “in Europe” part.

                There is no in Europe in the original comment. “No was since ww2 since 80 years old”.

                If anyone had asked me, the first option would have been my choice.

                Yeah, no one asked you and the US stayed there for 20 years.

                And it was Donald Trump who surrendered the Afghan people,

                Nah it was Biden lol. Pretty much he first thing he did when he got elected. Jeez do you even have wikipedia?

                But I don’t believe that you’re really all that torn up about the fate of Afghan women.

                Fuck off, don’t try to think for me. It’s not because YOU don’t care that nobody does.

                It just feeds your anti-NATO narrative.

                Yeah, I’m anti-NATO lol, and this is one of the reason. Why dont you pro-nato give me some fucking example of what good this organization? Wanna talk about Lybia, how sudden

                Why would they be? Ukraine is not a NATO country.

                Exactly. So Putin can fuck up the entire planet, NATO wont do shit as long as none of the members are directly attacked. Great organization.

                Now do you want to talk about Libya? How Gaddafi was best friend with all the NATO leaders until one day they changed their mind, pushed him away, and send financial sharks to “rebuild” the country.

                Again, I suspect this NATO enthusiasm is a US thing since I have never met someone from the left who was cheering for an imperialist military organization that’s only there to serves the economic interest of the west.

            • takeda@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 day ago

              NATO is a defensive alliance, but it also standardizes weapons, equipment and command.

              The only time when NATO article 5 was actually invoked was Afghanistan after 9/11. The other times it was mostly UN missions where individual countries volunteered to take part. NATO command was used, because it helped to work with multi national presence.

              • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                I’m asking the question again: What good exactly did NATO do in Afghanistan during 20 years? Bring democracy? Was it the plan all all along to leave a bunch of weapons and the control of the country to the Taliban? You’re aware that girls don’t have the right to go to school anymore, and often get forced into marriage at 12? Is that what NATO is for?

                Are you people just defending NATO because Trump said bad things about it? I’m genuinely curious, since when “leftys” started to cheers for NATO? I’m guessing this is mostly a US thing since being left in this country is basically being center-right in the rest of world.

                And just to clarify before being call a tankie, I think Putin is an evil manipulative piece of shit and I can’t wait for him to die (I hope he suffers a lot) so I can take a piss on his grave.

                • ManixT@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Countries that were subjected to Russian genocide and imperialism place great importance on NATO membership, especially since Russia is doing it all over again. Preventing death and loss of sovereignty is a very real benefit of NATO.

                • nao@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  since when “leftys” started to cheers for NATO?

                  If living in a nato country means you were able to live in peace for the past decades, I can see why people would like that, regardless of them leaning left or right.

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I get why in this momement where Ukraine appears to be dependent on NATO support, and where it seems like NATO is required to counterbalence Russia, why people would support the existence of it. But, it is absolutely a tool of US global hegemonic power. The US has committed some incredibly horrific acts to secure its position as sole global super power and NATO as a tool to develop and maintain that power has been used to that end, and will continue to be used in that way. We should not confuse tools of imperial power projection to be a good thing.