i can’t even guess as to why they went quiet. not one guess at all. we will never know.

edit: well they’re not quiet now once they get called out

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’re easy targets. Blame the abstainers and third party voters and you don’t have to confront the legitimate failures of your party and campaign.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’d rather keep up the blame game, ngl. Arguments didn’t work on the disingenuous pricks who helped get us here. I don’t care if they personally made a difference or not, I care that they were utterly unreasonable, and the change in circumstances won’t change that.

      Speaking to anyone who could’ve voted for Kamala but didn’t: I don’t care about solidarity anymore; you didn’t have solidarity with us when we needed you. Y’all are fucking stupid and I don’t want to deal with that. I realize that’s not the moral choice, but RN for the first time in over a decade I don’t care about that. I’m angry. Maybe in a few more days or weeks or months that will change, maybe not. Right now I’m focusing on making sure all my remaining friends are able to get somewhere safe if the need arises and keep hope kindled in their hearts. Maybe that means other people who need my help more will suffer, die, or fall victim to their own despair, but I just don’t have the wherewithal to make that my priority.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don’t care about solidarity anymore

        Never did. Solidarity means you aren’t willing to sacrifice marginalized groups to get ahead or save your own skin. If you accept sacrificing Palestinians, you’d accept sacrificing any other group by the exact same “lesser-evilist” logic. What value does that kind of “solidarity” have?

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Here’s the thing. I’m trans. On our own, we represent a tiny sliver of the voting public, not worth considering from a strategic standpoint. But there are plenty of other groups of people in the same boat. Together, we are worth considering - but only together. “What force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one?” If we try to build a coalition in which we abandon any group that the democratic politicians deem too much of a liability to be worth protecting, that is no coalition at all, and I well understand that after Palestinians, I will be next. The very same logic that these people were willing to deploy against them can and will be deployed to justify abandoning me and mine.

            What advantage do I gain from joining together in a “coalition” in “solidarity” with these fair-weather friends who will drop us at the first sign of trouble? Honestly, they are more of a liability than an asset, because if I’m buddying up with them, it damages my credibility among potentially more reliable people who have good reason not to trust them. I would rather do it the right way and build trust even if it means building from the ground up.

            I appreciate what you’re trying to do, but these disagreements are meaningful and important. This election may be over, but the question remains of what the appropriate strategy is going forward, whether to build a coalition that will treat an offense against one as an offense against all, and ensure that anyone who comes for any part of it is unelectable, or whether to “vote blue no matter who” as we are picked off one-by-one, in exchange for temporary, short term security for some.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Every ‘Vote Blue No Matter Who’ absolutely are fair weather friends. it means you don’t actually understand what you’re voting for and have no principles for which you’d hold the line. If you wouldn’t hold the line for a group experiencing a genocide you are not worth putting our group on the line for.

                You can absolutely continue to try papering over what the DNC and dems like the OP just did to the palestinians but there isnt an argument on this blue earth that will result in my forgiving of it. The only option for those individuals is repentance.

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Hey look it’s one of the problems.

          Please explain how Trump will bring in peace and stop Israel from hurting anymore Palestinians, since that’s the only way your dumbass argument would even be coherent

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Never claimed that and explained my logic plenty of times elsewhere, not interested in doing so with a low-effort troll.

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            > is subjected to any criticism what so ever

            > instantly falls into elaborate fantasy

            > shares fantasy with the public, for some reason

            > believes own fantasy, thinks others are insane

            > publicly and loudly tells people “I’m ignoring you”

            Seems about right.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Time is linear. The Democratic party backed a genocide BEFORE the election.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Lotta usage of the word solidarity when you were reliant on a people that the Democratic candidate campaigned on continuing the genocide of.

        Kinda seems like your definition of solidarity is ‘support me no matter what.’

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Look at that, a jackass fine with genocide falling back to ad hominem, because their screed of “I’m done with solidarity” when they had none in the first place gets pointed out for the bullshit it was.

            I’ll be sure to tell my trans friends it’s okay that they’re getting thrown under the bus next because Leate_Wonceslace is done with solidarity. The Dems are already explicitly blaming them for the loss.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it is important to point out the failings of others. Otherwise they may not connect the dots and learn from their mistakes.

      Sometimes a mistake is innocent, say you forgot to zip up your fly. It’s important to know you forgot to do so as it could be very socially embarrassing.

      Sometimes one could accidentally cut someone off in traffic because they didn’t see them. A good honk notifies them of their mistake and will hopefully drive home the fact that they probably need to pay better attention to traffic.

      Pointing out that abstaining and or choosing not to vote enabled the election of the greater of two evils is equally important.

      Rock on OP. Never let them forget!

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Then point at the FAILED DEMOCRAT PARTY instead of voters. When biden announced he was running for re-election their own internal polling showed he’d lose. They don’t fucking care, it’s all theatre to them. Their corporate owners are happy and the donations continue to flow in from foolish rubes like you who will gladly vote blue no matter who right off a fucking cliff.

        Kamala Harris spent a billion dollars and still fucking lost. But yeah go blame voters that will ensure the same thing happens in 2028 should we be so lucky to pretend to play democracy again. And it is pretend. Because if you don’t vote correctly you’re the worst person to ever exist.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          If that delusion makes feel better about enabling a facist, then you probably aren’t ready to come to terms with your failure.

          Sooner or later, one way or another, it will come for you.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve been repeating this thought exercise because people seem to have a hard time delineating when blame goes the other way.

          Bob is standing next to a bomb, and a fuse is sparking down. Jill, on the other side of a fence and reliant on Bob, lifts a huge very expensive sign for Bob to stamp out the fuse. Bob does not stamp out the fuse, bomb goes off.

          Who is at fault; Bob for not stamping out the fuse, or Jill for not getting a high-amp bullhorn to inform Bob he should stamp the fuse?

          Feel free to vary the analogy, but the question would extend to: When does it become Bob’s fault that he didn’t take action?

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It remains the democrats fault for:

            • gaslighting the public about inflation

            • gaslighting the public about not one but two new wars including a genocide!

            • refusing to run a small D democratic primary that they didn’t rig since checks notes 2004 (they tried to rig 2008 for Hillary but failed because Obama was so charismatic they couldn’t stop him)

            • refusing to run a primary at all in 2024, despite biden promising when elected in 2020 to be a one term president, and his own polling showed he’d lose in 2024

            • last minute Hail Mary of replacing biden with Harris despite not a single vote being cast for her

            • no platform other than “we’re not trump! Elect an anti-democratic party to save democracy! Trumps the next hitler!!!”

            • didn’t bother campaigning in swing states just like Hillary in 2016

            Gee I wonder why they lost the election. Couldn’t be that they continuously gaslight the public. Couldn’t be that they didn’t hold a primary (sorry but RFK Jr vanity run is not a primary). No, no. Voters just voted wrong!

            But don’t worry! We have to save dEmOcRaCy! Let’s just roll over and hand the power over to trump because he won fair and square and optics and politeness are more important than saving the country! You see, the democrat party doesn’t actually give a shit, if they were serious, they would have their own January 6th. They’re not serious. They’re gonna fundraise off of it. Just like roe v Wade!

            • Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              no platform other than “we’re not trump! Elect an anti-democratic party to save democracy! Trumps the next hitler!!!

              Yeah? Why do you need a platform beyond this?

              It was a competent former prosecutor vs a serially lying violent felon.

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                ‘But Trump’ got you Trump twice. At this point you’re arguing against the concrete proof that your view WON’T WORK to justify blaming people that tried to save you from yourself.

                You, in this case, is the DNC and everyone else blaming voters for the failure of the DNC.

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Why do you need a platform beyond this?

                They shouldn’t have even include the democracy angle in their campaign. You cannot run on “Trump is a threat to democracy,” when you own administration has completely failed to put the man behind bars.

                Imagine the insanity if Trump, in 2020, had ran on a campaign of taxes being too low, after he had just slashed them. That is the level of idiocy the Harris campaign was trying to run on.

                You had four years to put the guy behind bars. You don’t get to then point to him as a threat to democracy, since you yourself clearly do not consider him to be a threat to democracy.

                Actions. Speak. Louder. Than. Words.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Jill set and lit the bomb, and lifts up a big expensive sign saying that defusing bombs is antisemitic and what Putin wants. Bob tries as hard as he can to put out the bomb anyway, but Jill made sure to design it such that Bob can’t defuse it. So, once it’s clear his efforts are futile, Bob runs as fast as he can away from Jill and the bomb, and the bomb blows up.

            When does it become Jill’s fault that she did actively take harmful actions?

    • lurklurk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      On this platform specifically we’ve had months of smug people claiming to make the moral choice of directly or indirectly supporting the clearly worse choice. It’s far too early to just let that slide.

      If we in 100 years still sometimes talk about the early days of the fediverse where a bunch of morons fell for astroturfing, that’s kind of a good outcome.

      If they’re real people they should feel bad.

      For the not so real people, we should figure out how a distibuted system can deal with a concerted astroturfing operation.

        • lurklurk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Two weeks is pretty fast to go “let bygones be bygones” for people making such an obviously bad choice. We’re dealing with extremely dense people here who had months to figure this out and still made the obviously wrong choice. It’s gonna take some repetition for it to register.

          I say we keep talking about it at least until after there is another democratic election in the US, or talking about it becomes illegal in open forums in the US.

            • lurklurk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah, let’s blame the people actually supporting Harris for her loss. That’s a great idea. Let’s all just keep falling for russian psyops or stay quiet to not “divide” us again

              Great plan

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Let’s blame the people who forced her on us after voters totally rejected her in the 2020 primary. Some of us pushed for Biden to drop out far sooner and got shouted down. Some of us called for an open convention after he dropped out and got shouted down. Some of sounded the alarm about the Harris campaign running a Republican light strategy and got shouted down. How much failure does it take for establishment fools to shut the fuck up?

        • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Acting pretty mad for getting exactly what you wanted. But thank God virtue signaling about Gaza will survive past the actual existence of Gaza

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            Honestly I’m drinking liberal tears up. Where were you for the past four years “pushing biden to the left”? Out to brunch! Don’t you know the economy has never been better?!

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I am willing to move forward with centrists as coalition partners with the left-- only because neither of us can win alone, but after this election they have to come to the table as coalition partners, NOT leaders.

      Progressives need to leave the Democratic party. Voters know that neither progressives or centrists have the numbres to win alone, but Progressives have popular issues to run on, and centrists have nothing but hisorical momentum thats stopped pretty cold at the moment. All the “anyone but trump” people will still be there next election (assuming there is one) and they will vote for leadership that is promising good things. And progressives will win. So I say lets formally split, and if the centrists come along theyd be welcome, and if they’d rather go it alone then they should get used to losing because they have no other future.