• spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not trying to alienate anyone, I’m trying to understand why low latency gaming needs for digital nomads is worth the real downsides of providing such a service (scientific, GHG, atmospheric tinkering, etc). I also believe that we should leave a lot more of the earth alone and that nature matters. I’m not trying to put people anywhere, just recognizing there are pros and cons to different living schemes, humans are social creatures, and population of 2 areas don’t warrant large societal investments. I’m similarly against a hypothetical drone sushi delivery service for rural Canadadian boreal forests if that happens to have real downsides too.

    • dubious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      who said anything about gaming? what if you work remotely and can’t afford rent? what if you feel unsafe around gatherings of people (including small towns)?

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The original post I responded to was someone talking about how starlink lets them game in a rural RV. What about carbon emissions from thousands of rocket launches? What about atmospheric damage? What about astronomy? I’m saying the downsides don’t appear to be worth the upsides for these niche scenarios. Humanity survived just fine for quite some time before ultra remote Internet became a thing.

        • dubious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          look, i hate it too. i don’t want these things in my night sky either, but just give us anti-social, edge-of-civilization dwellers some respect and recognition. we’re not trying to take any more than we need.