• technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The article references another article referencing this paper that gives the following definition with reference to this paper:

      Ultra-processed foods are ready-to-eat/heat industrial formulations made mostly or entirely from substances derived from foods, including flavors, colors, texturizers, and other additives, with little if any intact whole food.

      It seems like the last referenced paper is the deep dive: Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them.

      TL;DR: It’s based on the NOVA classification system.

      (PS The “news” in USA is almost entirely propaganda and other capitalist trash. It’s no surprise when their “science” coverage is terrible. Most of the time it’s not even science.)

      • UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wish every article that talks about “ultra-processed” foods would just link to the NOVA system or some other reference. Otherwise it just makes their statements seem so empty.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The NOVA system is bad science, in my opinion.

        When asked to classify centuries-old staples like cheese or jam or bread or pickles, the experts struggle to find a consensus on which category any given food is. And so the classification system itself is so imprecisely defined that studies based on the system will rest on a shaky foundation.

        It’s better to identify what specific foods and what specific cooking techniques are bad and how they might be bad, rather than trying to say that the act of chopping, blending, mixing, cooking, or fermentation automatically makes a food less healthy.

        If certain additives are bad, say that those are bad. Don’t try to lump in the other processing techniques into one basket.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d go with the amount of additives compared to the “real” thing.

      Like basic bread is water, yeast, flour and salt.

      If your bread has 20 ingredients - it’s ultra processed.

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        That probably captures many such things but it’s not fool proof. I like to make bread with 2-4 different kinds of flour, 4-8 different kinds of seeds, a teaspoon or two of sugar to get the yeast going, sometimes milk or olive oil or another fat source. At it’s most complex it could get pretty close to 20 ingredients but I don’t feel that should be classified as ultra-processed. The kinds of ingredients used and the actual process also matters.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah, bread can get complicated depending on what you want to make. Excluding flour, I have in my pantry to make bread these:

          • espresso powder
          • cocoa powder (multiple varieties)
          • barley malt syrup
          • oats
          • variety of seeds (shitload of carroway mainly)
          • variety of spices
          • variety of nuts
          • variety of oils/fats (olive oil, peanut oil, ghee, sticks of butter, etc)
          • Baking powder
          • Baking soda
    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s very much victim blaming in my opinion.

      When you’re on a busy schedule because of work and don’t have a lot of free time, which is increasingly the case in today’s society, going to only one grocery store that’s closest to home is often the only option.

      Not everyone has the luxury of having the free time to seek out farmers markets. Nor are these available everywhere.

      The problem is this self regulation capitalist bullshit and a lack of government regulation with people’s well-being in mind.

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t forget you also have to take the time to cook that food.

          It’s much more time saving to cook something that’s already half prepared, like a taco kit, hamburger helper, or chicken nuggets than it is to prepare a whole dinner from scratch on a weekday to feed your kids.

          Also, even the best grocery stores around my place have pretty bad produce that are either half rotten or too unripe to eat right away and have no taste.

          Blame the victims all you want. But you’re wrong.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Spoken like a rich snob who has never had to work 3 jobs to make ends meet.

          Prepping fresh food takes time most Americans don’t have. Our system is set up so only the wealthy have time to cook.

          We need better safety nets and higher pay in order for people to simply have enough time to eat.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Very few Americans don’t have access to inexpensive (relative to processed garbage) high quality food.

          This is patently false. I would really recommend you read up on food deserts (or watch a video about them). These are very common, especially in poorer areas.