• chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        2 months ago

        I had to read this like 24 times to make sure I didn’t miss anything, but I’m 98% certain you’re correct. When referring to the individual components it should be chlorine not chloride. I’m not a chemical doctor, but this is my understanding.

        • Phineaz@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 months ago

          Horrible at chemistry, but I’m 98% sure it is chloride - the chlorine is present as an anion, and as such is called chloride. Even if you refer to it as an individual component, you still observe Cl-, not Cl (or rather Cl2).

          • cowfodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            46
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, the element is chlorine. Chloride denotes a compound or molecule containing a chlorine ion, or a compound with a non-charged chlorine atom bonded.

            • mars296@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              2 months ago

              This whole thread is very pedantic but in chemistry when someone refers to chlorine, they are usually referring to Cl2. I think in IUPAC naming chloride is reserved for for ions. Like dichloromethane (IUPAC) and methylene chloride (also common name).

            • Phineaz@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Now I am confused. Mind bearing with me for a sec?

              I was referring to the chlorine present in NaCl, that should in fact be chloride due to it’s anionic nature, should it not? I mean sure it’s pedantic, but I’d still like to know where I went wrong with that thought :D .