• variants@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        wait isnt it the other way around, buffering was costing profits for shareholders so they limited it?

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        95
        ·
        2 months ago

        I dunno, I’ve been in a few meetings where people with deep pockets make critical infrastructure decisions based on extremely limited information. Trusting “them” to have a valid metric is a rookie mistake.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          The older you get you realize more and more that the people making the decisions are totally clueless.
          …Until you become one of the decision makers.

          • acetanilide@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yep.

            At my first job I was in charge of implementing new software (definitely not in my job description - I was basically a secretary). I was discussing security concerns with the head honchos and they interrupted me and dismissed my concerns because they “only hire honest people.”

            They gave everyone admin permissions.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yuuuuuuup.

          “How much will option A cost? Dunno.”
          “What about option B? Dunno.”
          “My gut tells me B is much more expensive than A though.” “Yeah for sure. But I prefer B.”

          Wanna waste a hundred grand a year? Go right ahead, who cares. Wanna hire someone? Woah hold your horses there bucko, don’t you know we have budget limitations??

    • brian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Curious as to why that would be the case. Unless people are starting videos, letting them buffer, then reloading and doing it again.

      It should be the same amount of bandwidth, otherwise, right?

      • shottymcb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s just people not finishing videos. Buffered but never played. In aggregate it adds up to a lot.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah i dont use youtube like that either but lots of people open videos and close them without finishing them because loss of interest or attention or whatever.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        People opening 8 hour long music videos, then pausing them after half an hour and just keeping it open while they do something else.

        Then they come back after multiple hours and just close the browser.