And yes, I know people will say block keywords and communities, but people don’t understand some communities have rules and people must follow them.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    7 months ago

    This got reported as being not twitter or equal. I’m kind of on the fence about this. I see their point, but the original was twitter. Please tell me what you think in the comments, not just downvote or upvote. This will guide me in the future if we have any more posts like this.

    • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It probably shouldn’t be allowed in the future, but given that it has > 300 up-votes and is only now spurring a finer definition of the rule, I think it warrants an exception. If OP reads this, they now know to post this kinda thing in a different community in the future. But removing this particular post seems a little harsh.

      Edit: This is an awesome approach to moderation btw. People like you make lemmy great, thank you!

      • rose56@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I was searching for a community to post it, but I couldn’t find any. This one seemed closer to the idea l, a post where it says something. I also think I saw a photo from Facebook in this community, so…m Maybe we need a community about posts like these, but not twitter.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      I havent read the rules of the comm. but ive always perceived whitepeopletwitter as a place to post text based social media screenshots.

    • Do whatever, ruleslawyering is not helpful. Is the community enjoying it? It stays. Is it detrimental? It gets removed. The “rules” should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

      Is someone posting vaguely in the direction of the intent of the community? That would be good enough for me.

      Anyone trying to separate posts into increasingly niche communities (like the asinine dontdeadopeninside and nosafetysmokingfirst split on reddit) is not helping the community of posters and lurkers.

      • Stiffy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The “rules” should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

        I totally agree. Rules number 1, 4, and 5 are the most important, in my opinion. I’m not saying that there shouldn’t be rules in the communities; there definitely should be rules. Guidelines for what to post instead of what not to post will probably be more beneficial.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Fighting to remove as many posts as possible on Lemmy when we barely get any posts at all doesn’t make sense; ignore the people requesting you take a popular post down for some potential technicality.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t tend to think of wpt as specifically twitter posts. Maybe that’s how it started, but over time it has become a more generalized “screenshots of short text posts” type of thing in my mind. The “or similar” in the rules leaves a lot of ambiguity, but in my mind Twitter was always about short text posts, so any short text posts would fall under that “similar” umbrella. I wouldn’t object to seeing something from Facebook, Instagram, or Reddit being posted here as long as it was a text post and not super long, so it feels disingenuous to complain about a Lemmy post being here.

      • Ashenlux@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Especially since, twitter isn’t even twitter anymore. And the only thing you are going to get from what twitter has become is ragebait, bots, and racism. For “whitepeopletwitter” to continue and not end up dying from lack of content, it needs to start opening up to other sources that stick with the same idea as what twitter used to supply.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I am not sure how this changes the “the post was against the states rules which are there for a reason and the mod was the absolute most gentle about it” facts.

        Did I get the facts wrong?

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 months ago

      “It’s so unfair!” … as if the identical thing is not being done to literally everyone else all the time. Toddler logic.

      A nuance that people often miss about lemmy.ml’s authoritarian policies - whereby they ban people from communities they’ve never even seen before - is not that it is done, but that when it is it cites a hidden set of rules that are nowhere ever written down. Little kid logic, where the rules mean whatever they feel like in that moment, and if you don’t like it then feel free to try to stop them.

      Some people here are pushing for fascist Reddit 2.0, others for free-speech Voat, but most of us just want to get along somewhere in the middle without too much bother:-P.

      • Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 months ago

        My recollection is that Voat took a turn into being fascist Reddit 2.0 pretty quickly itself.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, you got me: by “hidden rules” I obviously meant the very highly visible, non-hidden ones, placed where nobody can miss them at the top of the page.

        • monkeyjoe@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Those hidden rules, shown openly and have working links. So hidden. I heard McDonald’s hides the Big Mac from the public too.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      The issue with a “no politics” rule though is that everything is political. It ends up just being the mods removing what they want to remove and letting what they want to see stay.

      • sexy_peach@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Okay and if the users of that community are happy with that and you are free to stay away, where is the problem exactly?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The issue is that users generally don’t get a say. Even in the fediverse, moderators aren’t chosen democratically. Yeah, you can start your own community and try to build it up, but inertia is not in your favor.

          Anyway, my point is that a “no politics” rule is not really reasonable. You can have one, and you can enforce it however you want. It will always just end up causing issues though. For example: look up Nazi degenerate art. It’s just art, right? However, to them it was political, and it was political in a way they didn’t like, so they removed it from society.

          No moderator is perfect. Even if you trust them, blurry rules probably aren’t the best. There’s better ways to define the intent than “no politics” that create clear borders of what’s allowed and what isn’t. Blurry rules are usually best for those who want to abuse it.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            The issue is that users generally don’t get a say.

            Yes that is because they don’t carry any of the responsibilities of running the server. Why would they be allowed to decide?

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I didn’t say they should. Your comment implied that they did (or at least implies participation is consent). I just pointed out that they, in fact, do not. There is no value judgement in that statement.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I just saw this post on “All”. I’m not part of this community and I don’t care to open an alternative for it. I’m just point out how blurry rules are open for abuse. Just because you agree with the person running things today doesn’t mean someone in the future won’t use it to remove something you want to stay. I don’t understand how people don’t get this yet.

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    7 months ago

    I already block so many keywords and communities here. It’s hard to keep up.

    Thank you mods for helping keep some places free of US politics.

  • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 months ago

    I won’t say all rules are valid or right, but this one just makes sense (in contrast to rules of some other communities, which outright ban certain opinions). Sometimes you don’t want to hear about all the doom and gloom, and for many people, it’s not good for their mental health to hear about it all the time. They know what’s happening, they need some time off.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    7 months ago

    Daft_ish has got a real problem if they’re that outraged by the mod’s response. I’ve seen plenty of powertriping arseholes to be mad at in my time, but this isn’t it.

    US politics, including about the ICE murders, is spoken about more than enough across the English speaking internet.

    I know as much about current US politics as I do my own country’s politics, because you can’t get away from it without blocking most posts on here.

    Which is to say that some of us would just like to have a space to NOT talk or think about politics, including US politics.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 months ago

      Which is to say that some of us would just like to have a space to NOT talk or think about politics, including US politics.

      Inb4: “You’re just privileged enough not to have to think about it.”

      No, I just want a brief goddamn respite every once in a while, everybody deserves that. Just because I want to be able to escape into a fantasy world sometimes doesn’t mean that I never talk about politics either, it’s like cheating on your diet, just let me have a fucking cookie every now and again ffs!

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        This 100%. I care about politics. I deeply care about what’s happening with our country.

        But I’ve had to pare down the places where I see it. I’ve stopped watching Last Week Tonight because it makes me feel so powerless on what I have control over. I absolutely love the show but I just…can’t anymore.

        I’m acting locally, participating in whatever protests I can, calling and emailing my reps as often as I can.

        But man…the right’s “flood the zone” works effectively and I can’t just keep burning out.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly. We’re not blind or don’t care about politics. I’m more than aware of my country’s problems and the US’s…

        But how am I meant to not burn out on this stuff if I can’t get away from it?

        Sure I could just detox from social media and go work on something that interests me, and that’s what I do most of the time…

        But sometimes I do still want to chat with others, and it’d be nice to be able to do that and have it not be about politics.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know more about US politics than my own country’s politics, which is a problem because it’s an election year and the Nazis need to get out of parliament.

      I need to get into the details of things so I can do my civic duty, but I’m fucking exhausted from all the American politics that for my own sanity I just don’t want to.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly. The far right of most countries barely even need to try anymore, the US has gotten so good at flooding the news that they even burn out people from other countries from the constant cynicism

  • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lemmyshitposts doesn’t have a rule against political posts and I fucking hate it. Shitposts are sacred. A shitpost is just silly, irreverent humor. That’s it. The moment you bring an agenda into that space it changes into something else.

    • binarytobis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      There was a while there where I was really into wholesome memes. People really don’t get what wholesome is. I started getting legitimately upset at what people thought was appropriate there so I had to block the communities.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        I remember that. It’s seems to have toned down a little but, like, no Lemmy, a murder revenge fantasy isn’t a wholesome meme. Jfc

        • 9bananas@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          on the flip side there’s the million “orphan crushing machine forgot to crush one orphan today! so wholesome!” type posts that are even worse imho…

          you know the ones: “kids save up to buy wheelchair for classmate”, “kid works 80h weeks to pay off lunch debt”, “kid works at meat packing plant after school to afford bicycle”, and on and on.

          each is more depressing than the previous.

          these types of posts are the exact opposite of wholesome, yet frequently get upvoted on wholesome communities and it’s just…what is wrong with people? why would you think that shit is wholesome??

          neither the stuff you mentioned, nor the orphan crushing machine stuff should be on wholesome communities.

          tbf, i noticed the popular wholesome comms seem to be doing a lot better on this front lately! waaay less orphan crushing machine, and way less of the “x died, yippee!” posts.

          • taiyang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            For sure, those were the posts that ultimately got me off other social media and lead me here, haha.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        A few years ago on reddit I tried to put together a little multireddit of wholesome and positive-news subs, but so many of the posts were Orphan Crushing Machine material that I gave up :/

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would make c/politicalshitposts but I am not responsible enough to be in charge of anything other then a Crack pipe and a liquor bottle.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Time, place, audience. Daft_ish thinks Lemmy needs a reminder that Alex Pretti was murdered in broad daylight? Imagining them walking up to Greta Thunberg while she’s eating a vegan soup for dinner and reminding her about how awful commercial fishing is

  • thlibos@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    As somebody who just came here from Reddit, I find all of these communities refreshingly free of American politics.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      On a side note, welcome.

      If you haven’t figured this out already and your front page feels stale, then switch around to “Hot,” “Top 6 Hours” or “Active.” Active is the default and feels stale on topics.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have the complete opposite experience, I almost cannot escape it here. My reddit infinite scroll was way more diverse, here it’s exclusively american politics and linux, and if it wasn’t for linux I would quit this whole platform

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t understand why have comms literally about politics and world news if you’re just going to post the same stuff to any other comm that really doesn’t need that kind of content. If people keep ignoring what belongs where, why have comms at all? Idk, maybe it’s my OCD talking…

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, so when I go to shitpost and people start taking the posts seriously, I try to say hey folks, look where you are, this isn’t a serious community, let’s keep the shit light.

      And so yeah, when folks shoehorn political agendas into literally any community they can, I’ll point out how it’s got nothing to do with the community, and how it’s frustrating, because it does not further the community, it just furthers that person’s (or bot’s) agenda.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    The problem with cute animals now isn’t politics, it’s AI. I don’t want to watch ANY AI animals. Just the thought of being tricked into watching even 1/4 of a vid that ends up being AI, or giving it $$$ via views, has destroyed /awww and all the rest.

    I hate this timeline.

    • ickplant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I post in a lot of animal communities, and while I cannot speak for others, I do not knowingly upload AI. I even started checking with AI detectors, which is not something I’ve had to do even a year ago.

      I think the rest of Lemmy (at least the core users) are very anti-AI and, like me, might only upload it by accident. So I assume good intent until proven otherwise.

      What makes me feel better about Lemmy is knowing that no one is making money off of me. Even if I do end up falling for some AI - there are no influencers making a buck off it unlike on IG and FB and TikTok.

  • djdarren@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have an ever growing list of blocked words on here, all in a futile attempt to limit how much US shit finds its insidious way into my feed. I really, really shouldn’t fucking have to mute half the dictionary, just to be able to access the internet without getting pissed off.

    I feel bad for those Americans who are suffering, and stand in solidarity with them. But man, it’s relentless. I know far too much about US politics.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cute animal pictures inevitably leads to conversations like:

    1. Pitbulls should be banned!
    2. Cats are an invasive species that are terrible for the environment and you shouldn’t let them outside
    3. Vegan arguments against pets
    4. Vegan arguments against feeding pets meat

    Politics is just turning life into a legal model, the way physics turns the universe into a mathematical model. To ban politics is to ban life itself. It is incredibly naive to think you can do so.

    Maybe you could ban US-cdntric discussion, but even that seems like a fool’s errand. We live in a globally connected world and the US is one of the most dominant forces in that world. Like it or not, US politics impacts the entire planet.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Declawing cats.

      Docking tails.

      Breeds of pets that are guaranteed to have health issues later in life.

      For profit animal breeders in general.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Tbf I wouldn’t complain about dog politics in a dog community, even though it would be nice if I didn’t have to argue against animal cruelty and instead could just look at a pic of a cute doggy, at least it fits the comm. At the same time, if the comm rules decide that dog politics are still politics and therefore banned, then follow the comms rules instead of trying to bully everyone into your rules, which doesn’t sound very leftist to me.

        Do I need to see posts about ICE in the dog comm? Fuck no.

        Honestly I’m surprised I have to explain that, it seems like common sense. Just keep shit related to the comm, and post other shit elsewhere.

        Like, should I start posting about Slackware in c/news and c/pics and c/dogs, or should I keep it in one of the many linux comms it belongs in? Ok, now, take that and apply it to everything else.

        Yay, we did it, we did it, hooray!