Alt. Profile @Th4tGuyII

  • 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 20 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2024

help-circle




  • Exactly!

    Applicants are expected to dedicated hours of their time to writing their application and performing background research - both of which are becoming increasingly more tedious over time - so the least a company could bloody do is show some basic respect by paying an actual human being to come interview you!





  • Trump’s lawyers are expected to argue that none of the memos should have been given to prosecutors on the crime-fraud exception, which allows prosecutors to see privileged communications between a defendant and a lawyer, if their legal advice was used in furtherance of a crime.

    They’re expected to argue on the basis that these memos didn’t amount to using Corcoran’s legal advice.

    But surely that’s a moot point, because while Trump didn’t use of any specific legal advice, he absolutely abused the privileged information obtained from Corcoran (such as the date of the inspection and the date of his return) in obstructing the return of classified documents to the whitehouse.

    The memos make quite clear that Trump abused attorney-client privilege in furtherance of a crime. Plain and simple.

    And I severely doubt Corcoran didn’t know what Trump’s intentions were with that information - and if not before, he certainly should’ve known afterwards when being “asked” to pluck out documents.


    I legitimately have to wonder how it can be legal for Trump to be trialled by judges he put into power, and that have shown such clear and demonstrable biases in his favour - even going so far as to deliberately delay cases as far as legally possible.

    As @[email protected] put it, it’s like he’s got an extra special justice system especially for him - who knew all you needed to do was appoint your own judges.


  • I’m in no position to tell you to stay or go, after all it’s your life to lead, nobody else’s…

    Having said that, I can’t help but notice from taking a rather cursory glance at your post history that most of your posts are pretty well up-voted.

    The only posts where you seem to be heavily down-voted are political posts, which by their very nature will invite disagreement - this is especially true when the posts you’re making touch upon rather controversial/inflammatory topics.

    And if that’s what you’re complaining about being down-voted for, then you’ve really only yourself to blame for inviting that disagreement into your life.











  • One, that is a very long way of saying the idea you’re bringing to the table is don’t vote - and I’ve already said what I think about that.

    And yes, I understand this would likely mean some really shitty years, but that’s the cost to make Democrats understand they need their base.

    Two, that’s a bit of an understatement considering just one highlight of Trump’s last presidency was rigging the SCOTUS towards being openly corrupt and against the people for literally decades to come.