• Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes, I’d much rather have my tax dollars going toward that than another air superiority fighter that: A. Doesn’t work and B. Wouldn’t be used because most of our military engagements are against groups without air forces.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Shockingly the military isn’t the reason we cant have the other things we want, it’s because we don’t make everyone pay their fair share.

        Also while it’s unpopular the f22 project did push the envelope for technology and that money wasn’t just burned, the f22 is still quite the technological achievement and even failures result in significant research and development

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Well it’s sensor fusion technology has been the blue print for every machine intended to “make its own decision” in terms of where it goes, and what functions it uses. The sensor tech created have lead to a bunch of significant increases in a number of tracking technologies, everything from optically informed triggers and movement, improvements in camera, and display tech, and a large array of sensors using a lot of other means of sensing things, such as EM fields/projection. The air frame has informed the development of more efficient commercial aircraft. Developments in HUD/AR displays have a lot to thank from the tech developed for the F-22’s pilot information systems. All sorts of different user interface tech was influenced by things developed for it.

            A whole lot of what many industries have been doing draws from stuff developed for the system. So-much-so that congress made an amendment that specifically blocked the sale of the F-22 and its associated sub-systems.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Prioritize reading of fiction. We put too much emphasis on reading for education, but reading can be a great escape too.

      People need escape mechanisms. Reading fiction is an escape and it makes people more literate and more articulate.

      Educating the low level stuff is just as important as the high level stuff. And by low level stuff, I mean the ability to form coherent sentences, and arrange those into paragraphs.

      Just running tons and tons of text through the brain helps with this. My Spanish verb conjugation, for example, got much better when I started reading Spanish literature. Because a good story eventually covers all the bases of all the tenses for conjugation, many many times. It’s so much more effective than a textbook on conjugation.

      We learn by examples. Especially language. The best way to learn language is unconsciously, as a side effect of trying to communicate. A good story grips the reader’s conscious mind on the plot, allowing the absorption of the linguistic rules to be absorbed unconsciously.

      We don’t have enough respect for fiction. We think people need to read about physics or history to get smarter. No. They can read about an adventure, and get smarter. Just like a person can play soccer and get more skilled. Drills are fine, but just playing the game makes you better too, and it’s so much more engaging than doing drills.