• JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I mean Hilary definitely fucked those kids, but she isn’t running for office afaik

        Edit: Sarcasm is a little beyond y’all then lol.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If you can’t spell Hillary or understand the concept of evidence, maybe keep quiet a bit more? The other option would be pick up a book.

          • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Epstein, kid fucking, Clinton, assumption switch, joke.

            I didn’t think it was a banger but I also assumed it was a little more obvious. My mistake

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There is so much wealth backing up the incentive to never disclose the contents of the known files that someone like Trump can literally just babble about being uncomfortable disclosing the contents in the most guilt-steeped, incriminating way imaginable (as he did) and even face backlash for it by millions, and STILL the news cycle will bury it, nobody will be allowed to question him on it, it will disappear like everything else that could potentially harm the wealthy.

      It’s wild how many people on the right are still locked into a fantasy world belief about rings of powerful cultists kidnapping children to perform rituals and drain their essences like some kind of Indiana Jones movie… meanwhile they are sending money to the very people who sponsor the world’s most elite and expensive child-sex-trafficking operations.

      They rather the darkness of the world be packaged into some kind of fantasy-scape Hollywood narrative so that it’s easier to dismiss and not actually worry about, something that can be set down and walked away from the way you would a bad movie. This preserves the emotions and assuages the fears and guilt.

      • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yes. As far as I have read. Also that goes double now that SCOTUS has made almost anything the president does legal.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 months ago

          Technically I don’t think they declassify it, but they can release the contents if they so desire.

          Back in the 50’s my dad had a security clearance, and at one point worked on a highly classified project that he said about 10 people, including the President, knew the full details of. A few months after my dad’s involvement with the project ended he heard the President talk about it during a state of the union address.

          The next day when he got to work there was a memo waiting for him saying that under no circumstances was he to confirm, deny, or even talk about anything he may have heard the President talk about.

          The project remained classified for years after that day because it involved national defense. The President spoke about it to let the USSR know what our capabilities were, but not the specifics of how we did it.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        apparently, just by thinking about it. yes.

        the president can literally do whatever he wants with the only recourse being if congress decides to punish him. he could kill trump tomorrow and as long as the congress leaves him be, its legal as an ‘official act’.

        • StructuredPair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          5 months ago

          The conservative court would just rule it wasn’t an official act and say he could be prosecuted for it. They have no qualms with contradicting themselves for whatever political goal they are seeking to achieve.

          • takeda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well, that’s why he would need to “reform” the court first.

            It’s such fucking ridiculous ruling showing how they destroyed their legitimacy by simply being partisan hacks.

          • Icalasari@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Hence why the first official act abused in this way would need to get rid of the conservatives on the court. Sure, the remainder will still likely punish, but they also aren’t self contradicting jackasses so it works out for the best

      • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Assuming this is in reference to Epstein’s testimony to the Grand Jury, that was never classified. Those records were sealed under State (Florida) Law. And were also unsealed in July by a special (also State) law. But, to answer the question you are asking “could the President unseal such documents?” No, the President could not. Especially considering that the documents were sealed by State Law, over which the President has zero say. The President could apply political pressure and ask the State nicely to do it. But, the President cannot unilaterally override State Law.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          A State can’t deny the federal government access to documents. Once the federal government has the documents, they can do whatever they want with them. They can be sealed to Florida residents and unsealed to DC residents.

          But more simply, a Federal Judge can over rule a State Judge.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yes. A President can declassify documents, but there’s a process to it.

        It’s part of the whole debate about the Trump classified docs case. He essentially claimed he secretly declassified them, which is of course stupid and not a thing.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        President can declassify most state secrets. For example, when Trump decided to display a satellite photo to the media, that counted as an on the spot declassification.

        The big exception is restricted data, which is technical know how to produce nuclear weapons.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is like an awful boomer meme I’d expect on Twitter or Facebook. This is giving me cringe by association and is just humor for dumb people.