Weekly servings of boiled, baked or mashed potatoes weren’t associated with an elevated risk of Type 2 diabetes — but french fries were.

Craving french fries? Dunking your spuds in a deep fryer might be a recipe for elevating your risk of Type 2 diabetes.

According to a study published Wednesday in the journal BMJ, swapping out your weekly dose of frites for boiled, baked or mashed potatoes could lower your risk of this chronic condition.

The authors examined the diets of more than 205,000 adults in the U.S. who responded to questionnaires about what they ate over nearly four decades. Among those who consumed potatoes, the authors looked at which people developed Type 2 diabetes, a disease that leads to persistently high blood sugar levels.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, Jesus Christ… Okay, I’m pretty sure this a correlation/causation thing.

    Let me ask you, where do you usually eat french fries in the United States? Think about it for a minute.

    Did you answer at a fast food place? Because while I don’t have any data on hand I’m pretty sure that’s the correct answer. At least I know that’s where I eat most of my fries. So assuming that’s correct the headline transforms to “People who regularly eat fast food are at higher risk for diabetes”.

    No fucking duh.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      These types of studies can literally only detect correlation. They look at massive data sets and yank out patterns. It’s closer to reading tea leaves than hard science.

    • xep@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but since Diabetes Type 2 is chronically elevated blood sugar, cutting out carbs does seem highly logical.

      • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The chronically elevated blood sugar is mainly caused by insulin resistance. Insuline resistance isn’t necessarily caused by eating too many carbs. One of the known risk factors is obesity, and seems to stem from the fat tissue itself and not from the food that has caused the obesity. I’m not saying that eating too many carbs is harmless, but I’m just pointing that it’s more complicated than that.

      • sexy_peach@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        highly logical

        Sure, but it’s not the whole story, since people can eat massive amounts of carbs and sugar. Entire populations have lived very healthy lives on 90%+ starchy foods. It’s other factors as well. Fats for example can inhibit the muscles from taking in sugars, changing the resulting insulin response.

        • xep@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are absolutely right, and your grasp of the nuance is well appreciated. Our bodies seem to function best on either, in no particular order

          1. carbs and protein
          2. fats and protein

          Mixing all three seems to cause problems.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Let’s be real, mixing all three in excess is causing problems. But of course it’s not necessary easy to limit intake on modern society.

            • xep@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s also entirely possible that mixing all three results in excess. Our bodies have satiety signals that can be dysregulated.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t read the study and obviously neither have you

      One wants to think that in a study like this, researchers kept that in mind and ensures that those variables were accounted for.

      I can’t vouch for any of that, but that is such a “step one” that it’d be really stupid if they hadn’t

  • danzania@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought this was funny.

    His study found that whole grains, when compared to all types of potatoes, were less likely to elevate one’s diabetes risk. White rice, on the other hand, had a stronger association with Type 2 diabetes than either of these foods