Although the canal saves the 700-kilometre (430 mi) journey around the Peloponnese, it is too narrow for modern ocean freighters, as it can accommodate ships only of a width up to 17.6 metres (58 ft) and draft up to 7.3 metres (24 ft). In October 2019, with over 900 passengers on board, a 22.5 metres (74 ft) wide and 195 metres (640 ft) long Fred. Olsen Cruise Lines cruise ship successfully traversed the canal to set a new record for longest ship to pass through the canal. Ships can pass through the canal only one convoy at a time on a one-way system. Larger ships have to be towed by tugs.[37] The canal is currently used mainly by tourist ships; around 11,000 ships per year travel through the waterway.[38]
You missed the craziest part, it started being dug in the time of ancient Greece and in fact there’s a commemoration carving of Hercules on one of the entrances.
Safety issue/margin, I would presume, whereas the cruise ship was trying to set a record and thus probably got whoever was in charge to waive the normal standards.
17.6m was probably the maximum allowed width, but it was possible to pass through with bigger ships, but my guess is that insurance companies would not like it very much
Bruh i actually did skim over it a second time because i expected it to be there, but i still missed it somehow. Thanks for the correction :) But yeah point being the big ass ships cant maneuver precisely enough to be allowed to steer themselves in a canal this narrow.
Sorry yeah, that was definitely rude, having a bad morning, figured like you replied to a response to them and just didn’t read the comment… so common these days unfortunately.
I think it’s real - Corinth Canal.
You missed the craziest part, it started being dug in the time of ancient Greece and in fact there’s a commemoration carving of Hercules on one of the entrances.
https://corinthianmatters.org/2016/04/11/on-the-remains-of-neros-corinth-canal-project/
-To be that guy, probably more accurate to call him Heracles when talking about Greek things
True enough.
Great read, thank you!
It can only accommodate 58ft wide ships but it can accomodate a 74 ft wide ship?
Safety issue/margin, I would presume, whereas the cruise ship was trying to set a record and thus probably got whoever was in charge to waive the normal standards.
17.6m was probably the maximum allowed width, but it was possible to pass through with bigger ships, but my guess is that insurance companies would not like it very much
I assume it didnt go through there by itself as you can guess by the ropes tied to the tow ship that is probably pulling it.
Yes that was addressed in the comment.
Bruh i actually did skim over it a second time because i expected it to be there, but i still missed it somehow. Thanks for the correction :) But yeah point being the big ass ships cant maneuver precisely enough to be allowed to steer themselves in a canal this narrow.
Sorry yeah, that was definitely rude, having a bad morning, figured like you replied to a response to them and just didn’t read the comment… so common these days unfortunately.
All good, enjoy your day ^^
Just gotta push it, push it real good
I wonder if this is width at waterline vs. overall width confusion?