• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well that’s reassuring, it’s only her external genitalia you’re advocating tooth and nail for showing to her future partner.

    Glad we cleared that up.

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Reading through this entire comment chain was interesting, because it seems everyone has missed each others points

        FlyingSquid I believe means like, parents having a photo album (ie, a literal traditional physical one my mum had of me) which contains like “photo of first bath” or “photo of new t shirt but no bottoms cause running around as toddlers do”, completely innocent shit mixed in with general baby photos. And pulling that album out is used to embarrass the adult son/daughter with funny baby pictures and “haha look at baby you naked”, completely innocent humour. It might be less common these days, generationally people don’t do it as much.

        nomus(?), killingtime(?) etc etc the others replying seem to be taking the comic literally as if the photos are solely of genitalia and thats the frame/centre point of the image instead of it just a kid doing something normal and happens to be nude.

        I am sure flyingsquid isn’t going around with photos of their kids privates to show to people / send it to people etc with the specific intention of showing private areas but instead like my previous example, the kid is in the bath. Or running around without bottoms or a nappy cause it was changing time. Who knows. But its a far cry from the extreme end which everyone else seems to be assuming

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thank you, you’re right. But I’m still interested to see if the person I am offering to take my information to the police will do it.